4,915 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Verify code-review or security-review findings for false positives using deep codebase tracing, framework-aware analysis, and web research. Produces a .verified.md report alongside the original. Use when a review report has been generated and needs independent verification, or when user runs /verify-findings, mentions "verify review", "check false positives", or "validate findings".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan a project to detect configured quality and testing tools across JVM (Gradle/Maven), Android (AGP/Compose/KMP), Node.js/TypeScript, and Python ecosystems. Cross-reference against research-backed recommendations and assist with setup. Auto-detects project type(s) including monorepos with mixed ecosystems. Use when user asks to "audit tooling", "recommend tools", "quality stack", "what tools am I missing", "setup eslint", "setup detekt", "add coverage", "add ruff", "configure CI quality pipeline", "scan project tools", "tooling audit", "android tooling", "android quality", "compose testing", "kmp testing", or "screenshot testing".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this when the user wants to generate, normalize, verify, deduplicate, or export training datasets for Codex, Antigravity, or Claude Code from topics, URLs, reference material, web research, or existing JSONL/CSV files. Supports SFT and DPO workflows, custom export schemas, and deterministic local pipeline scripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
对任何主题进行系统调研，自动产出图文并茂的 Markdown 文档（含 Mermaid 结构图 + qwen-image 可视化），保存到认知结构对应维度的知识库，并自动注册到文档分类清单和知识图谱。当用户说「帮我调研/调研一下/系统调研/研究一下/帮我系统了解/深度研究 [主题]」时触发。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-grounded workflow for designing, reviewing, and improving video game user interfaces, including HUDs, menus, navigation, focus states, onboarding/tutorials, objective tracking, input prompts, readability, accessibility, and destructive-action flows. Use when asked how to make good game UI, critique a game UI or HUD, propose UI/UX guidelines, design menu or gameplay interfaces, compare HUD vs diegetic/spatial presentation, create a UI design brief, or run a usability/accessibility review for PC, console, mobile, or VR games.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively study and apply elegant coding patterns. Each iteration - understand the code, research what simple and elegant code looks like, apply learnings, verify with CI. Use as a standalone refactoring pass or when the user asks to make code more elegant, simple, or idiomatic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enter talk mode — conversation and research, no repo changes. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/talk` or `$talk`; never auto-select from a natural-language question or design discussion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes ELF binaries, executables, and firmware images to understand behavior without source code; coordinates sub-skills binary-re:triage, binary-re:static-analysis, binary-re:dynamic-analysis, binary-re:synthesis, and binary-re:tool-setup. Use when working with a binary, executable, or ELF file; asked to reverse engineer, disassemble, decompile, or figure out what something does; targeting ARM64, ARMv7, x86_64, or MIPS; or analyzing Python bytecode (.pyc, marshal). For Python bytecode analysis, see docs/python-bytecode-re.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs static analysis of binary code using radare2 and Ghidra — function enumeration, cross-reference tracing, decompilation, and control flow graphs without executing the binary. Use when disassembling or decompiling code, mapping functions, tracing data flow, or building hypotheses before dynamic verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Observes runtime behavior of binaries via QEMU emulation, GDB debugging, and Frida hooking — syscall tracing, breakpoints, memory inspection, and function interception. Use when running, tracing, or debugging a binary, verifying hypotheses from static analysis, or watching actual syscalls, network calls, or file access; requires human approval before any execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Installs and configures reverse engineering tools including radare2, Ghidra, GDB, QEMU, Frida, and cross-compilation toolchains for ARM64, ARMv7, x86_64, and MIPS. Use when a tool command fails, a required tool is missing, or you need to set up a fresh analysis environment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fingerprints unknown binaries using rabin2 — detects architecture (ARM, x86, MIPS), ABI, libc, dependencies, and strings of interest. Use when first encountering an unknown binary, ELF file, or firmware blob, or when you need architecture or ABI information before committing to deeper analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compiles binary analysis findings into structured reports — correlates facts from triage, static, and dynamic phases, validates hypotheses against evidence, and produces traceable documentation. Use when ready to summarize findings, generate a report, document what a binary does, or prepare results for handoff or archival.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate survey data pipelines and research methodology. Analyzes response bias detection (speeders, straight-liners, bots), statistical significance testing (t-test, chi-square, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction), sentiment and theme extraction from open-ended responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit pricing research and sensitivity analysis systems for Van Westendorp price sensitivity meter (OPP/IDP/PMC/PME intersections), Gabor-Granger demand curves, Newton-Miller-Smith revenue extension, price elasticity econometric modeling, willingness-to-pay estimation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze grant management and sponsored research operations including proposal lifecycle tracking, pre-award routing and budget development, post-award expenditure monitoring and burn rate analysis, 2 CFR 200 Uniform Guidance cost allowability enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze university and research institution funding allocation systems including RCM revenue attribution, performance-based budgeting, faculty startup package management, F&A indirect cost recovery distribution, equipment sharing and core facility recharge rates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Competitive intelligence and market positioning analysis. Researches competitors, compares features, pricing, and tech stacks, then produces a prioritized gap analysis with actionable roadmap..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes App Store and Play Store listing optimization -- keyword research, title optimization, screenshot conversion analysis, A/B testing setup, review sentiment analysis, competitor gaps, and localization coverage..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate user research interview scripts using Mom Test principles. Use this skill when: - You are preparing for user interviews or pilot observation sessions - You need a question bank organized by behavior, context, pain points, and workflow - You want interview guides that avoid leading questions and hypotheticals - You need per-persona interview guides - You are preparing for field visits or pilot debriefs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write SEO-optimized long-form articles targeting specific keywords using the They Ask You Answer Big 5 framework (Marcus Sheridan). Articles are categorized by Big 5 type (Cost, Problems, Versus, Best/Reviews, How-To) and structured accordingly. The "answer first" rule applies to every article. Use when the user asks for an SEO article, blog post for ranking, "rank for keyword X", organic content, search-optimized post, pillar page, or content for organic traffic. Includes keyword targeting, search intent matching, internal linking suggestions, and meta tags. For improving an existing article, see copy-review. For deciding what to write about, see social-calendar pillars and icp-research. For repurposing it, see content-repurposer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update user personas from new feedback, pilot data, or research. Use this skill when: - New pilot data or feedback reveals changed user behaviors or pain points - Annual persona review is due (1-2x per year) - New user segments are discovered that need persona documentation - Existing personas need validation against recent data
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says "run customer discovery", "help me interview customers", "write customer interview questions", "validate my assumption", "talk to users", "synthesize customer interviews", "what are my customers saying", "user research for my startup", "mom test interview", "are we solving a real problem", or wants to extract real insight from conversations with potential or existing customers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build psychological safety in your team using Simon Sinek's Leaders Eat Last Circle of Safety model and Amy Edmondson's research. Use when a leader says "my team doesn't speak up", "people are afraid to fail", "nobody challenges bad ideas", "people only tell me what I want to hear", "I want my team to take more risks", "there's a blame culture", "people hide mistakes", or "I want to create a safe environment". Also trigger when someone describes a team where postmortems turn into blame sessions, where people stay quiet in meetings and then vent privately, where mistakes are hidden until they become crises, or where the same person speaks 80% of the time in every meeting. Psychological safety is not about comfort - it is the condition that makes high performance possible.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。