「report」の検索結果

Organize, categorize, track, and manage invoices systematically with automated extraction of invoice data, payment tracking, and financial organization. Use when processing invoice uploads, extracting invoice details (date, amount, vendor), categorizing expenses, tracking payment status, organizing receipts, generating financial reports, or building accounting and bookkeeping systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process, parse, create, and manipulate Microsoft Word (.docx) documents programmatically using libraries like docx or mammoth.js for document generation and data extraction. Use when generating Word documents from templates, extracting text and formatting from .docx files, creating reports and invoices, parsing resumes and forms, converting Word to HTML, creating mail merge documents, or automating document workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh drift-prone documentation against current code. Reads docs/architecture/freshness-catalog.yml, diffs against the last sweep's upstream/main anchor, regenerates mechanical entries, processes editorial markers, and opens one PR per sweep with a report file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily per-section review cycle driving a section toward the smallest, clearest form that still does everything it does today. Selects its section live each run (scripted), inventories every file, derives the target shape before any scan, works parallel reading threads into one ranked list and strikes it on a 2-3h budget. One PR per run; each run's report and Needs-Peter queue live in its own docs/health/runs/ file; 'resume' applies Peter's answers later. Use for the morning section-improvement run, 'doctor <section>', or 'run section doctor'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to debug, fix a bug, investigate an error, or do root cause analysis, and when users report errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, or say something stopped working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this broken", "investigate this error", or "root cause analysis". Proactively invoke this skill (do NOT debug directly) when the user reports errors, 500 errors, stack traces, unexpected behavior, "it was working yesterday", or is troubleshooting why something stopped working. (gstack)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "quality check", "test the app", "run QA".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug AEM Workflow issues on AEM as a Cloud Service — stuck workflows, failed steps, missing Inbox tasks, launcher failures, stale instances, thread pool exhaustion, queue backlogs, purge failures, and permissions errors. Use when the user reports workflow problems on Cloud Service, asks why a workflow is stuck or failed, needs step-by-step troubleshooting, or provides thread dumps, configuration status output, or Sling Job console output for analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search for existing content pages containing a specific block in AEM Edge Delivery Services. Reports URLs with occurrences and variants to help identify test content during development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a compact KPI digest showing how key metrics changed over a period and what's driving the movement. Use this skill when someone asks for a performance summary, a weekly recap, a morning briefing, a KPI update, or any variation of "how did we do this week/month." Also trigger for "give me a performance overview," "what moved in the last 7 days," "pull our AA KPI report," or "summarize our metrics."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a compact KPI digest showing how key metrics changed over a period and what's driving the movement. Use this skill when someone asks for a performance summary, a weekly recap, a morning briefing, a KPI update, or any variation of "how did we do this week/month." Also trigger for requests like "give me a performance overview," "what moved in the last 7 days," "pull our KPI report," or "summarize our metrics."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Babysit a GitHub pull request during a user-approved monitoring window by polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and report fresh review feedback. Use when the user asks Codex to monitor a PR, watch CI, handle review comments, or keep an eye on failures and feedback on an open PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Harvest every `ponytail:` comment in the codebase into a debt ledger, so the deliberate shortcuts and deferrals ponytail leaves behind get tracked instead of rotting into "later means never". Use when the user says "ponytail debt", "/ponytail-debt", "what did ponytail defer", "list the shortcuts", "ponytail ledger", or "what did we mark to do later". One-shot report, changes nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect a repository and emit a guidance orientation report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

COMPLETE BUG INVESTIGATION WORKFLOW — Combines screenshot + log reading into a full triage pipeline. USE FOR: any bug report that has both visual symptoms AND runtime errors, especially CompositePanel / ChildPanel mount failures, screen spec wiring breaks, or battle scene UI crashes. This is the master debugging workflow that orchestrates cocos-screenshot and cocos-log-reader together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan evidence reports and draft governed upgrade proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DEBUGGING SKILL — Read and analyze Cocos Creator project.log for runtime errors, warnings, and stack traces. USE FOR: any bug report, crash, UI glitch, TypeError, null reference, missing asset, CompositePanel mount fail, ChildPanel route fail, or screen spec wiring error. Load this skill FIRST before any runtime debugging session. DO NOT USE FOR: compile errors (use get_errors tool instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure, profile, and fix performance bottlenecks — Core Web Vitals, backend latency, bundle size, and database queries. Load when performance requirements exist, users report slowness, profiling reveals bottlenecks, or the user asks to optimize load time, LCP, INP, CLS, or response time. Not for premature optimization without evidence. Pairs with browser-testing-with-devtools and ci-cd-and-automation for regression guards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tactical fast path: turn a small problem, bug report, edit request, or narrow refactor into three deliverables — a brief change-spec (docs/specs/), a detailed implementation-ready plan (docs/plans/), and a TODO.md with agent-pickable tasks and milestones. Load when the user describes a tactical problem and wants quick planning artifacts, says "plan this change", "create a TODO", "write a plan for this", "problem to plan", "break this into tasks for agents", "I want to change X — plan it", or when process-decomposer routes here after determining the user needs lightweight planning deliverables. Also triggers on "create tasks from this problem", "make this actionable", or "turn this into a plan agents can execute". For feature-sized work that needs an executable spec + constitution + cross-check gate, route to `spec-driven-development` (or `feature-spec`) instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a code change end-to-end in the current worktree: identify what changed, run the relevant tests, get the app running, drive a browser over the affected areas, and report a verdict with screenshots. Generic across project types (Laravel/Herd, Node/bun, frontend, CLI, library). Use when the user wants to verify/QA/smoke-test a change, check that a PR or branch works, validate uncommitted work, or says "/flow", "verify this change", "does this PR work", "test and click through this". Optional target: PR number/URL, branch/ref, or worktree path; default is the current working changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme. These artifacts can be slides, docs, reportings, HTML landing pages, etc. There are 10 pre-set themes with colors/fonts that you can apply to any artifact that has been creating, or can generate a new theme on-the-fly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate PPTX presentations, DOCX documents, XLSX spreadsheets, and PDF reports from structured JSON input using PaperJSX.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。