「cis」の検索結果

>

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

>

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a Beads-first refactor plan through detailed interview, repo verification, alternatives, scope boundaries, testing decisions, and tiny working increments. Use when the user wants to plan a refactor, write a refactoring RFC, or turn a risky change into safe incremental work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test a plan against existing domain language, code behavior, and durable decisions. Use when the user wants DDD/domain-model grilling, glossary refinement, terminology challenges, context documentation, ADR candidates, or plan validation against a repo's language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Relentlessly stress-test a plan or design through a one-question-at-a-time interview that researches available context first and includes a recommended answer with every question. Use when the user asks to "grill me", wants a plan/design challenged, or needs decisions resolved before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert .NET backend architect specializing in C#, ASP.NET Core, Entity Framework, Dapper, and enterprise application patterns. Masters async/await, dependency injection, caching strategies, and performance optimization. Use PROACTIVELY for .NET API development, code review, or architecture decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert database architect specializing in data layer design from scratch, technology selection, schema modeling, and scalable database architectures. Masters SQL/NoSQL/TimeSeries database selection, normalization strategies, migration planning, and performance-first design. Handles both greenfield architectures and re-architecture of existing systems. Use PROACTIVELY for database architecture, technology selection, or data modeling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for Private and Internal member testing strategies. Use when you need to test private or internal members, configure InternalsVisibleTo, or evaluate testability design. Covers design-first thinking, reflection testing, strategy pattern refactoring, AbstractLogger pattern, and decision frameworks. Keywords: private method testing, internal testing, InternalsVisibleTo, reflection testing, GetMethod BindingFlags, Meziantou.MSBuild.InternalsVisibleTo, testability design, strategy pattern refactoring, testability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill provides symbol-level code understanding and navigation using Language Server Protocol (LSP). Enables IDE-like capabilities for finding symbols, tracking references, and making precise code edits at the symbol level.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects a .NET UI framework. Decision tree across Blazor, MAUI, Uno, WinUI, WPF, WinForms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decides how to test .NET code. Unit vs integration vs E2E decision tree, test doubles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses inter-service protocols. REST vs gRPC vs SignalR vs SSE decision matrix, tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses documentation tooling. Starlight, Docusaurus, DocFX decision tree, migration paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chooses a data access approach. EF Core vs Dapper vs ADO.NET decision matrix, tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start or resume a MYOT task by reading AGENTS.md, project_map.md, and history.md, archiving history.md when switching tasks, and preparing a concise current task snapshot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use FIRST when someone asks for a new feature or a change to an existing one — before any schema, code or test. Works out what is actually being asked for, whether to build it or integrate a third party (Trustpilot, Stripe, Calendly and the like), where the data lives, who may do what, and what happens when the vendor is down. Produces a decision, then hands to feature-schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises from completed phase artifacts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest external plans with conflict detection against project decisions before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and selects Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) products based on organizational requirements including feed integration capability, STIX/TAXII support, workflow automation, analyst interface, and total cost of ownership. Use when conducting a TIP procurement, migrating between TIP solutions, or assessing whether the current TIP meets program maturity requirements. Activates for requests involving ThreatConnect, MISP, OpenCTI, Anomali, EclecticIQ, or TIP procurement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy Cisco Duo multi-factor authentication across enterprise applications, VPN, RDP, and SSH access points. This skill covers Duo integration methods, adaptive authentication policies, device trust

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks that define step-by-step procedures for specific incident types aligned with NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks. Covers playbook structure, decision trees, escalation criteria, RACI matrices, and integration with SOAR platforms. Activates for requests involving IR playbook creation, incident response procedure documentation, response runbook development, or SOAR playbook design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes indicators of compromise (IOCs) including IP addresses, domains, file hashes, URLs, and email artifacts to determine maliciousness confidence, campaign attribution, and blocking priority. Use when triaging IOCs from phishing emails, security alerts, or external threat feeds; enriching raw IOCs with multi-source intelligence; or making block/monitor/whitelist decisions. Activates for requests involving VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, MalwareBazaar, MISP, or IOC enrichment pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。