本文へ移動
cccskills

「before」の検索結果

6,239 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Validates custom dotnet new templates for correctness before publishing. Catches missing fields, parameter bugs, shortName conflicts, constraint issues, and common authoring mistakes that cause templates to fail silently. USE FOR: checking template.json files for errors before publishing or testing, diagnosing why a template doesn't appear after installation, reviewing template parameter definitions for type mismatches and missing defaults, finding shortName conflicts with dotnet CLI commands, validating post-action and constraint configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery), creating projects from templates (use template-instantiation), creating templates from existing projects (use template-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4862026年10月14日 更新

Use when a framed and root-caused problem needs its assumptions made explicit before design or planning begins — explicit Assumptions, Unknowns, and a Validation plan. This should trigger when an issue's Assumption Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to surface hidden assumptions and unknowns before committing to an approach. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jabrena/plinth4502026年10月13日 更新

Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jabrena/plinth4502026年10月13日 更新

Use when a problem under exploration needs its quality attributes (non-functional requirements) identified and prioritized before architecture and design begin. This should trigger when an issue's Quality Attribute Discovery point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to discover and prioritize candidate quality attributes for a problem, before any ADR or design work starts. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jabrena/plinth4502026年10月13日 更新

Enhancement-overlay skill — the DECISION + WIRING layer for LM observability that the single-backend skills [[langsmith]], [[phoenix]], [[mlflow]] do NOT cover. Each of those installs one backend; none of them help you DECIDE which backend fits your stack/scale/budget, nor give you a one-line autolog that turns it on fast. Use when starting any LM project, before the first deploy, or the moment someone asks "why did it do that?" and there are no traces to answer with. The skill picks a backend by stack (LangSmith for LangChain/LangGraph; Phoenix for OSS/local OpenTelemetry; MLflow for ML-shops already on MLflow; Langfuse for self-host), wires one-line autolog, verifies traces land, and adds eval hooks — instrumenting BEFORE you need it. Cross-links the first-debug-move skill [[agentsop-prompt-history-inspect]]. Do NOT activate to re-teach a backend you already chose (defer to its own skill), or for non-LM ML experiment tracking with no LLM calls (that is plain MLflow).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentsope/SkillAlchemy4262026年10月9日 更新

Tool skill — the *first move* in any LM-debugging session: dump the actual rendered prompt the framework sent to the model, before changing anything else. Activate when an LM call produced an unexpected output (wrong answer, schema violation, refusal, truncation, cost spike, latency spike, infinite loop, "model got dumber after upgrade"). The skill enforces a 30-second inspect step BEFORE any prompt edit, model swap, retry, or temperature tweak. Cross-framework cheat sheet: DSPy `inspect_history`, LangGraph `get_state_history`, CrewAI `step_callback`, LangChain `set_debug`/`set_verbose`, Aider `/diff`+`--verbose`, raw OpenAI/Anthropic via `OPENAI_LOG=debug`/`ANTHROPIC_LOG=debug` or HTTPX event hooks. Do NOT activate for first-time prompt authoring, exploratory prompt design, or non-LM bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentsope/SkillAlchemy4262026年10月9日 更新

Explores intent and design before implementation. MUST use before creating or modifying any feature, component, or behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jamditis/claude-skills-journalism4212026年10月5日 更新

Align on the shape of a change through an interview, then implement it. Escalates open product decisions and settles the implementation shape in conversation. Use when the user asks to "discuss this change", "align on this change first", "ask me questions first", "interview me then implement", "agree on the approach before coding", or wants the shape of a single change settled before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tobihagemann/turbo4112026年10月14日 更新

Stops an agent from destroying uncommitted work with git. Requires git status and git diff before any command that discards changes, treats "revert" and "undo" as manual edits, and never runs reset, checkout, clean, stash drop, or force push without explicit approval. Use when a task involves reverting, undoing, resetting, cleaning, rebasing, or force pushing, or before any git command in a repo with uncommitted changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

waynesutton/builder-skills4072026年9月28日 更新

Activates automatically before chapter writing to enforce the 9-item mandatory file reading checklist - prevents AI focus degradation in long-form fiction by ensuring all context is loaded before each writing session

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microck/ordinary-claude-skills4062026年9月7日 更新

Adversarially review something just built — presume it is broken and find where. Use after implementing a feature, finishing a build, or before shipping, or whenever ATLAS or Boss wants a hostile second opinion on a diff, a running app, or a whole codebase. Spawns clean-context reviewers with opposing lenses (correctness, security, empty-world) and reproduces every finding by running the target before believing it. Distinct from /code-review, which statically reads a diff and never runs the app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

syahiidkamil/Software-Engineer-AI-Agent-Atlas4012026年6月25日 更新

Use when starting an engagement, before exploitation, or whenever the attack surface changes — build/validate the threat model and detect drift (new unreviewed surface) before advancing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude3912026年9月28日 更新

Guide to quality filtering raw VCF files before computing summary stats (Ts/Tv ratio, variant counts, AF distributions). Covers detecting raw VCFs via FILTER column and QUAL inspection, QUAL-based filtering with bcftools, Ts/Tv interpretation, and when NOT to filter. Read before any variant-level QC task. See bcftools-variant-manipulation for advanced filters, gatk-variant-calling for caller config, samtools-bam-processing for upstream alignment QC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills3792026年9月29日 更新

Shrink a Robonix change before review without changing behaviour. Use when a feature works and tests pass, before opening or updating a PR, and when a review asks for a smaller change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

syswonder/robonix3782026年10月14日 更新

When the user wants to deeply understand their ideal customer before writing copy — pains, desires, inner monologue, and language. Also use when the user mentions "empathy engine", "know your target", "customer pain points", or asks to research their audience before writing Blitz Copy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Illyism/seo-skills3672026年10月7日 更新

submit

無料日本語概要

This skill should be used when the user is ready to submit their tax return, needs a final review checklist, wants to know how to submit (e-Tax, mail, or in-person), or asks about common mistakes before submission. Trigger phrases include: "提出準備", "提出方法", "e-Taxで提出", "チェックリスト", "申告書の確認", "提出前の確認", "郵送で提出", "税務署に持っていく", "提出期限".

kazukinagata/shinkoku3652026年9月9日 更新

Use before running any confirmatory analysis or looking at outcome data, when testing a hypothesis, computing a p-value, or about to claim an effect - locks predictions and decision rules before results are seen

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

K-Dense-AI/science-superpowers3552026年9月13日 更新

Use after completing an analysis or before reporting a finding, to have a skeptical reviewer attack the conclusion before you believe it

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

K-Dense-AI/science-superpowers3552026年9月13日 更新

After a working session, produce a report on what changed plus a quiz the user must pass before merging. Use when the user asks "what did we actually do," wants to review a large change, or invokes a quiz before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Neeeophytee/finding-unknowns-skills3512026年9月28日 更新

Build apps on Databricks Apps platform. Use when asked to create data apps, analytics tools, or custom interactive visualizations. A plain "create a dashboard" request means a managed AI/BI (Lakeview) dashboard → use databricks-aibi-dashboards, not this skill. Evaluates data access patterns (analytics vs Lakebase synced tables) before scaffolding. Invoke BEFORE starting implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

databricks/databricks-agent-skills3482026年10月14日 更新

Run a month-end (or period) close checklist against a Well workspace — verify everything is reconciled and posted before the books are closed. Use when the user asks to close the month/period, run a close checklist, check if the books are ready to close, or what's left before closing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WellApp-ai/Well3452026年10月8日 更新

Use to run real static analysis over a diff or repo before shipping — Semgrep, CodeQL, secret scanning, dependency CVEs — and triage the findings into what must be fixed now versus noise. Trigger before a release or PR merge, during a security review, or when the user asks to scan the code for vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3432026年10月2日 更新

Use before building anything from a vague request — a feature, an app, an agent, an automation, a page. Trigger when the user says "build me X" without specifics, when a brief could be read two ways, or when the user asks to be challenged, interrogated, or pushed on requirements before code gets written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OneWave-AI/claude-skills3432026年10月2日 更新

Enforces validation and evidence before claiming work complete. Use before declaring implementation done, creating a PR, or submitting deliverables for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

athola/claude-night-market3412026年10月14日 更新