1,670 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Authoring playbook for building agents that triage and reply to customer messages — support tickets, email inquiries, chat questions, refund requests, or product issues. Use this when the user wants an agent that handles inbound customer questions, drafts replies, escalates hard cases, summarizes tickets, or follows a support playbook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns marketing prompts into tested, versioned production assets: A/B prompt evaluation against structured test cases, immutable prompt version history with diffs, ready-to-use marketing prompt templates (ad copy, email campaigns, social posts, landing pages, SEO meta), and an LLM-governance playbook for marketing teams (claim discipline, disclosure rules, human-review gates). Use when a marketing team relies on AI-generated content and needs prompt quality to be measurable and safe — or when the user mentions 'prompt engineering,' 'improve my prompts,' 'prompt templates,' 'prompt versioning,' 'AI content workflow,' or 'AI governance for marketing.'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
/cs:caio-review <plan> — Eval-demanding Chief AI Officer interrogation of any plan that involves AI: model selection, risk classification, cost economics, or AI hiring. Use when shipping an AI feature without an eval set, choosing between API, fine-tune, and self-hosted, or classifying a use case under the EU AI Act.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chief AI Officer advisory for startups: model build-vs-buy decisions (API vs fine-tune vs in-house), AI risk classification under EU AI Act + US state patchwork, AI cost economics (API-to-self-hosted breakeven), and AI team org evolution. Use when deciding whether to call an API or fine-tune, classifying AI use cases for regulatory risk, calculating when self-hosting pays off, sequencing AI hires, or when user mentions CAIO, AI strategy, model selection, foundation model, fine-tuning, EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, AI governance, model risk, or AI economics. Strategic only — does not duplicate engineering AI/ML skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs, asks about Codex itself or choosing Codex surfaces, needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, or model upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; use OpenAI docs MCP tools for non-Codex docs questions, use the Codex manual helper first for broad Codex self-knowledge, and restrict fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for actionable defects. Correctness is the core; performance and security are optional sub-cases of the same engine. Anchors on agreements between participants across a boundary, forces a violating execution, and refutes every candidate before reporting. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, audit a codebase, or check whether a fix is safe.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create comprehensive test scenarios from user stories with test objectives, starting conditions, user roles, step-by-step actions, and expected outcomes. Use when writing QA test cases, creating test plans, defining acceptance tests, or preparing for feature validation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle — qa-lead strategy and test plan, qa-tester case writing, execution, sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Soak test protocol for extended play — what to observe and log for slow leaks, fatigue, late-appearing edge cases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA test plan for a sprint — classifies stories by Logic/Integration/Visual/UI, covers automated tests, manual cases, smoke scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a PR for code that can be deleted or simplified. Use when asked to review for simplicity or unnecessary edge-case overengineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write Python code in n8n Code nodes. Use when writing Python in n8n, using _input/_json/_node syntax, working with standard library, or need to understand Python limitations in n8n Code nodes. Use this skill when the user specifically requests Python for an n8n Code node. Note — JavaScript is recommended for 95% of use cases — only use Python when the user explicitly prefers it or the task requires Python-specific standard library capabilities (regex, hashlib, statistics). EXCEPTION — for Python in the AI-agent-callable Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode), use the n8n-code-tool skill instead (input is _query, return must be a string).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when creating a demo or test page for manual testing of Handsontable. Trigger when the user asks to create a demo, test page, repro page, reproduction case, manual test, or wants to verify a bug fix or feature visually. Also trigger when the user mentions dev-generated.html, dev-pr.html, dev-latest.html, dev.html, or wants to compare behavior between a released version and a local build. Use this for any PR that needs a manual testing artifact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guidance for security alert triage in Google SecOps. Use when investigating and triaging security alerts, determining false positives vs. true positives, assessing entity risk, adjusting alert severity or priority, and closing or escalating alerts and cases. Don't use for deep multi-hop incident investigations across host timelines (use secops-investigate), proactive threat hunting or retroactive IoC sweeps (use secops-hunt), or authoring new detection rules (use secops-detection-engineering).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discovers requirements and generates architectural, design, and deployment guidance for dynamic hybrid search systems by combining semantic search and keyword search. Optimized for AlloyDB hybrid search use cases in Google Cloud. Use when users need vector search combined with structured SQL filtering, faceted attributes, semantic reranking, in-database AI validation, or serverless hosting across transactional relational databases, analytical data warehouses, or managed database engines. DON'T use this skill for simple keyword-only search, or when a standalone non-relational vector database is required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides developers through implementing event and conversion ingestion to Google products using the Data Manager API /v1/events/ingest endpoint and its associated client libraries. Use this skill when the user wants to upload offline conversions, enhanced conversions for leads, click conversions, Google Analytics web or app events, or any other event ingestion use case supported by the Data Manager API. Don't use for uploading audience members (use the data-manager-api-audience-ingestion skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides developers through managing (adding, removing, and clearing) audience members for Google products using the Data Manager API and its associated client libraries. Use this skill when the user wants to upload audience members, remove specific users, or clear/replace an entire audience for Customer Match, mobile device ID audiences, or any other audience use case supported by the Data Manager API. Don't use for uploading events or conversions (use the data-manager-api-event-ingestion skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Employee offboarding runbook for {{projectName}}. Detects newly marked departures via the {{hris_group}} group in Okta, then works one independent case per departure across Okta, Google Workspace, Google Drive, and GitHub — revoking access, transferring ownership, and reclaiming licenses — holding the ownership transfer for a human approval gate (never deleting an account) and posting the completed checklist to {{notify_channel}}.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
New-hire onboarding runbook for {{projectName}}. Detects new-hire records via the {{new_hire_group}} group in Google Workspace, then works one scoped case per hire — preparing the Workspace account and group memberships, adding them to the right Slack channels, and filing a first-week checklist in the {{onboarding_project}} Linear project — holding account creation and group membership for a human approval gate and posting the result to {{notify_channel}}.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Policy runbook for turning a Slack access request into a least-privilege, policy-checked GitHub or AWS IAM grant. Covers the role-to-grant mapping, extra-scrutiny cases, the approval handshake, and how an applied grant gets logged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Legal document drafting -- contracts, memos, briefs, complaints, demand letters, opinions, discovery, settlements, ToS, privacy policies. Full pipeline: document structure, per-section writing, Bluebook citation, case law lookup (CourtListener API), regulation lookup (eCFR API), DOCX output, and TDD-style verification (defined terms, cross-references, placeholders, boilerplate, citation format). Triggers on: 'draft a contract', 'write a legal memo', 'create an NDA', 'write a brief', 'legal document about', 'draft a complaint', 'terms of service', 'privacy policy', 'demand letter', 'settlement agreement', 'legal opinion', 'discovery requests', any request to produce a legal or law-related document.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assertion-first AI eval framework aligned to Anthropic's 'Demystifying evals for AI agents' — typed deterministic asserts + a forced-structured LLM judge over an input→assert case schema, pass^k/pass@k, capability vs regression suites, subscription-billed. USE WHEN eval, evaluate, benchmark, regression test, assertion, assert, llm-rubric, judge, pass@k, pass^k, grade output, compare prompts/models, test agent. NOT FOR scientific-method framing (use Science), property/mutation testing of code (use Hardening), or live UI verification (use Interceptor).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured multi-angle exploration running 2-8 sequential passes over the same problem, each through a different scientific lens, to surface hidden requirements and edge cases invisible from one angle; each pass yields new ISC criteria. USE WHEN iterative depth, explore deeper, multi-angle analysis, surface hidden requirements, blind spot check, what am I missing. NOT FOR scope/zoom analysis (use ApertureOscillation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。