本文へ移動
cccskills

「cause」の検索結果

961 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Implements and validates the fix for a bug once a failing reproduction test exists. TRIGGER when: a bug has a failing reproduction test and you are ready to make it pass, implementing the root-cause fix, the final step of the bug-fixing pipeline. DO NOT TRIGGER when: no reproduction test exists yet → opsmill-dev-test-driving-bugs; still diagnosing, or asked to fix a bug with no analysis or reproduction test yet → opsmill-dev-analyzing-bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

opsmill/infrahub5372026年10月14日 更新

Self-healing codebase system. Monitors runtime errors, test failures, and build breaks. Automatically diagnoses root cause, generates fix, validates fix, and applies if safe. Zero human intervention for routine failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5332026年8月9日 更新

Incident severity classification, runbook templates, root cause analysis, and post-incident review

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

vibeeval/vibecosystem5332026年8月9日 更新

Use this skill to get documentation for third-party APIs, SDKs or libraries before writing code that uses them to ensure you have the latest, most accurate documentation. This is a better way to find documentation than doing web search. This includes when a user asks for tasks like "use the OpenAI API", "call the Stripe API", "use the Anthropic SDK", "query Pinecone", or any other time the user asks you to write code against an external service and you need current API reference. Fetch the docs with chub before answering, rather than relying on your pre-trained knowledge, which may be outdated because of recent changes to these APIs. Be sure to use this skill when the user asks for the latest docs, latest API behavior, or explicitly mentions chub or Context Hub. Ensure `chub` is available, run `chub --help`, then follow the instructions there.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

mxyhi/ok-skills4962026年10月9日 更新

Validates custom dotnet new templates for correctness before publishing. Catches missing fields, parameter bugs, shortName conflicts, constraint issues, and common authoring mistakes that cause templates to fail silently. USE FOR: checking template.json files for errors before publishing or testing, diagnosing why a template doesn't appear after installation, reviewing template parameter definitions for type mismatches and missing defaults, finding shortName conflicts with dotnet CLI commands, validating post-action and constraint configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery), creating projects from templates (use template-instantiation), creating templates from existing projects (use template-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4862026年10月14日 更新

Guide for optimizing MSBuild incremental builds. USE FOR: builds slower than expected on subsequent runs, 'nothing changed but it rebuilds anyway', diagnosing why targets re-execute unnecessarily, fixing broken no-op builds. Covers 8 common causes: missing Inputs/Outputs on custom targets, volatile properties in output paths (timestamps/GUIDs), file writes outside tracked Outputs, missing FileWrites registration, glob changes, Visual Studio Fast Up-to-Date Check (FUTDC) issues. Key diagnostic: look for 'Building target completely' vs 'Skipping target' in binlog. DO NOT USE FOR: first-time build slowness (use build-perf-baseline), parallelism issues (use build-parallelism), evaluation-phase slowness (use eval-performance), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4862026年10月14日 更新

Author and review GitHub Actions workflow YAML safely so syntactically-valid YAML can't ship a workflow that GitHub Actions refuses to run. USE FOR: editing, adding, or reviewing any file under .github/workflows/, writing run-name/name/if/env/run values that contain ${{ }} expressions, diagnosing a run that fails with 'This run likely failed because of a workflow file issue' and no jobs starting, deciding when a workflow scalar must be quoted, validating workflows with actionlint. DO NOT USE FOR: authoring application YAML unrelated to GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines, GitLab CI, or non-workflow YAML. SCOPE: this skill covers *syntactic/structural* correctness of workflow YAML (quoting, parsing, actionlint); for *semantic and functional* workflow design (what a workflow should do, agentic-workflow behavior), see .github/agents/agentic-workflows.agent.md — the two are complementary. INVOKES: actionlint (downloaded pinned binary) plus git/grep for inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

managedcode/dotnet-skills4862026年10月14日 更新

Systematic investigation of metric changes and anomalies. Use when a metric unexpectedly changes, investigating business metric drops, explaining performance variations, or drilling into aggregated metric drivers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nimrodfisher/data-analytics-skills4752026年9月25日 更新

当监控平台、日志平台、值班对话或变更后异常暴露出某个资源、域名、IP 或业务现象时,围绕告警目标自动展开上下游拓扑,检查同一拓扑内的关联异常并归并根告警、派生告警和噪声告警,输出根因候选、影响范围和结构化诊断摘要。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bytedance/agentkit-samples4712026年10月12日 更新

Create and check long-running video material evaluation tasks. Use this skill when the user wants to submit videos for evaluation, check an existing video evaluation task list, or fetch the result of a previously created video evaluation task. This skill is not a general-purpose video upload skill because upload is allowed only as an internal step of task creation. Authentication uses an API key passed as an Authorization bearer token.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bytedance/agentkit-samples4712026年10月12日 更新

Use when a framed and root-caused problem needs its assumptions made explicit before design or planning begins — explicit Assumptions, Unknowns, and a Validation plan. This should trigger when an issue's Assumption Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to surface hidden assumptions and unknowns before committing to an approach. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jabrena/plinth4502026年10月13日 更新

Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jabrena/plinth4502026年10月13日 更新

Explain why a change, incident or session went as it did, separating proven causes from coincidence. Use when: a postmortem or retro is selected by name.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

boshu2/agentops4482026年10月14日 更新

debugging

無料

Comprehensive debugging specialist for errors, test failures, log analysis, and system problems. Use when encountering issues, analyzing error logs, investigating system anomalies, debugging production issues, analyzing stack traces, or identifying root causes. Combines general debugging workflows with error pattern detection and log analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aiskillstore/marketplace4332026年10月14日 更新

【Bug 诊断专用】当遇到程序错误、异常行为、性能问题、功能故障时必须使用本技能。触发关键词:报错、Bug、问题、异常、故障、不工作、诊断、排查、修复。本技能提供系统性根因分析,输出详细诊断报告和可执行修复方案,包含代码位置引用、步骤指导、注意事项。仅提供分析和方案,不直接修改代码。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aiskillstore/marketplace4332026年10月14日 更新

Coder-agent working-file budget discipline: keep the editable working set (files you /add into writable context) under ~25k tokens, separate "read" from "edit", delegate breadth to a read-only repo-map, and drop files once edited. Use when an LLM coder-agent edits multiple files, when the working set must stay focused, or when the model starts editing the wrong file / missing targets because too much context dilutes attention. Search keywords: context window full, agent edits wrong file, too much context, /add /drop files, working file budget, context dilution, lost in the middle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

agentsope/SkillAlchemy4262026年10月9日 更新

Read from a UModel object-graph semantic layer with the `umctl` CLI (MCP alternative noted). Three kinds of read: (1) entities & relationships / topology (`.entity`, `.topo`) and (2) the model itself (`.umodel`, and `.entity_set` methods, including entity-linked `list_skills`) return real rows; (3) metrics & logs (`get_metrics` / `get_logs`) return an executable *plan* — PromQL / Elasticsearch DSL with the entity id pre-substituted — that you run against the backend. Against a PaaS endpoint the same calls return data rows instead of a plan. Use to query or read UModel entities, relations, topology, or model metadata; to read a service's metrics or logs; to look up services and dependencies; or to discover what objects, datasets, and methods exist. For root-cause analysis on top of these reads, see the `umodel-rca` skill. Triggers: UModel, object graph, .entity / .topo / .umodel / .entity_set, query entities, read topology, read metrics / logs, get_metrics / get_logs, list services / dependencies / datasets / skills, 实体查询, 关系/拓扑查询, 读模型, 读指标, 读日志, 查指标, 查日志, 查服务依赖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

alibaba/UnifiedModel4192026年10月12日 更新

Systematically investigate bugs, test failures, build errors, performance issues, or unexpected behavior by cycling through characterize-isolate-hypothesize-test steps. Use when the user asks to "investigate this bug", "debug this", "figure out why this fails", "find the root cause", "why is this broken", "troubleshoot this", "diagnose the issue", "what's causing this error", "look into this failure", "why is this test failing", or "track down this bug".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tobihagemann/turbo4112026年10月14日 更新

help

無料

Think before typing. Root cause first, two candidate fixes, pick one, ask if still unclear, then change only the files the request needs. Edit the confidence bar and scope rules to fit the project. Use when a bug report comes in, when a previous fix did not work, or when the request is vague.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

waynesutton/builder-skills4072026年9月28日 更新

Master systematic debugging techniques, profiling tools, and root cause analysis to efficiently track down bugs across any codebase or technology stack. Use when investigating bugs, performance issues, or unexpected behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microck/ordinary-claude-skills4062026年9月7日 更新

Use when invalid data causes failures deep in execution, requiring validation at multiple system layers - validates at every layer data passes through to make bugs structurally impossible

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microck/ordinary-claude-skills4062026年9月7日 更新

Pre-implementation confidence assessment (≥90% required). Use before starting any implementation to verify readiness with duplicate check, architecture compliance, official docs verification, OSS references, and root cause identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Microck/ordinary-claude-skills4062026年9月7日 更新

Current Playwright (1.64) patterns for writing, debugging, and scaling reliable test suites. Use for any Playwright task, even ones you think you know, because the guides cover APIs and CLI flags newer than most training data. Covers writing or fixing tests, locators, a failing or flaky test, a trace.zip or error message, playwright.config and projects, network mocking, auth, visual and accessibility testing, Docker and CI sharding, playwright-cli browser automation, Playwright Test Agents, page objects, migrating from Cypress or Selenium, and QA work: test case design, bug reports from failures, automating manual test cases, and reviewing tests. TypeScript and JavaScript.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

testdino-hq/playwright-skill3932026年10月12日 更新

Generates a structured Bug Fix Brief (BFB) to document issue corrections. Includes root cause analysis, repro steps, fix options, and fix checklist. Use when user asks to create a BFB, document a bug fix, or generate a bug correction document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit3582026年9月10日 更新