615 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, security, and performance with comprehensive feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dispatch reviews to external companion AIs (Codex, Gemini, Claude) for an independent second opinion on code changes, PR readiness, doc completeness, architecture, or implementation status. Use when you want a fresh-eyes review beyond Claude-native. Trigger on "get a second opinion", "companion review", "review my changes", "review the PR". For Claude-only quality checks use /code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude-native review of code for quality, structure, naming, and maintainability (no external AI). Use when reviewing a file or diff for code quality before committing. Trigger on "review this code", "code review", "is this well-written". For security, use /security-verify; for companion-AI review, use /review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs critical code reviews using REVIEW.md guidelines. Evaluates code quality, architecture, testing, and domain-specific concerns (legal faithfulness, cross-law references, engine safety). Use after completing significant code changes or before merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and act on code-review feedback with technical judgment. Use before applying external suggestions, especially when feedback is ambiguous, broad, or may conflict with repository constraints, and carry confirmed corrections to relevant consumers without widening scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write custom Semgrep rules to identify organization-specific logic flaws, improper cryptography usage, or missing authorization checks during source code review. This skill focuses on moving beyond default rulesets to locate complex vulnerabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decompile, analyze, and reverse engineer Android applications (APKs). Utilize tools like JADX, Apktool, and dex2jar to extract source code (Java/Kotlin), analyze manifest configurations (Intents, Activities), and identify hardcoded secrets or insecure API endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
收到代码审查反馈后、实施建议之前使用，尤其当反馈不明确或技术上有疑问时——需要技术严谨性和验证，而非敷衍附和或盲目执行
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
完成任务、实现重要功能或合并前使用，用于验证工作成果是否符合要求
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform structured code reviews focusing on correctness, readability, security, and maintainability. Use this skill when reviewing pull requests, evaluating code changes, or establishing review standards for a team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-commit code quality review for Unity C# code. Checks against Rules, CODING_STANDARDS.md, NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md, and GDD Gherkin test coverage. Use when code has been written and tests are passing but before committing. Runs automatically at Step 8.5 of /uw-cmd-implement-feature. Triggers on "review this code", "check my implementation", "pre-commit review", "code review", "check before commit", "is this ready to commit", "review my changes", or any request to validate code quality before committing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用于用户要求通用前端代码评审、PR 评审、合并就绪评估、架构可维护性、类型安全、渲染/状态风险、样式一致性、可测性缺口或横向评审总结时。深度安全、无障碍、E2E 或性能问题应委托对应专项 skill；中文触发词包括 代码审查、代码评审、review。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for general frontend code review, PR review, merge-readiness assessment, architecture maintainability, type-safety, rendering/state risks, style consistency, testability gaps, or a cross-cutting review summary. Delegate deep security, accessibility, E2E, or performance investigations to their specialized skills; Chinese triggers include code review, code review, review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify code-review or security-review findings for false positives using deep codebase tracing, framework-aware analysis, and web research. Produces a .verified.md report alongside the original. Use when a review report has been generated and needs independent verification, or when user runs /verify-findings, mentions "verify review", "check false positives", or "validate findings".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent review resolution with trust-but-verify methodology. Accepts a PR number/URL or a local code-review report file. Extracts review comments, verifies each with parallel agents using confidence scoring (0-100), filters false positives, presents a triage report for approval, then applies fixes and replies. Use when user runs /resolve-review, mentions "resolve PR comments", "address review feedback", "fix PR suggestions", "handle review comments", or "resolve review findings".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional code review craft: review strategy, feedback that lands, reviewer efficiency, and team review culture. Use when reviewing code or improving a team's review process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured code review discipline: correctness, design, readability, and security checks with actionable feedback. Use when reviewing diffs, PRs, or code snippets before merge or after writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for quality, bugs, and design issues. Use when the user says "review this code", "do a code review", "check this PR", "review this diff", "is this code good", "what's wrong with this code", "code quality check", or pastes code and wants feedback - even if they don't explicitly say "code review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert code reviewer focusing on quality, maintainability, performance, and best practices
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。