「contract」の検索結果

Analyzes contracts and agreements for risks, unusual terms, and missing clauses

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end MegaETH development playbook (Feb 2026). Covers wallet operations, token swaps (Kyber Network), eth_sendRawTransactionSync (EIP-7966) for instant receipts, JSON-RPC batching, real-time mini-block subscriptions, storage-aware contract patterns (Solady RedBlackTreeLib), MegaEVM gas model, WebSocket keepalive, bridging from Ethereum, and debugging with mega-evme. Use when building on MegaETH, managing wallets, sending transactions, or deploying contracts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform evidence-backed impact analysis before changing code, data, interfaces, or governance documents, then compare the planned impact with the actual diff after implementation. Covers call paths, data and schema, API contracts, tests, documentation, ADRs, deployment, migration, and rollback. Use for cross-module or high-risk changes, database migrations, authentication, public interfaces, blast-radius questions, pre-change checks, and post-implementation alignment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

REST APIのURL、応答形式、エラー処理を一貫したルールで設計・見直しします。ページ分割や認証、利用回数の制限、バージョン管理まで整理するスキルです。

• 新しいAPIの窓口を設計したいとき
• 既存APIの仕様を見直したいとき
• ページ分割や絞り込みを追加したいとき

Ruby on Railsアプリの実装・レビューで、業務処理や検索、フォームの責務を整理するスキル。データ取得の無駄を防ぎ、バックグラウンド処理や画面部品の設計も支援します。

• 大きなcontrollerの業務処理の分離
• 複数モデルを更新するフォームの設計
• 重複する検索やデータ取得の見直し

機械学習モデルを本番で使うために、データの仕様、再現可能な学習、品質評価、配備、監視、切り戻しを整理し、実装計画やレビュー項目にまとめるスキル。

• 実験コードを学習パイプラインにしたいとき
• モデル公開前の品質基準づくり
• データ漏洩や前処理の不一致の調査

本番データベースの列・索引・データを変更する手順を整理します。大きなテーブルの分割更新や段階的な切り替え、復旧計画を含めて移行を設計するスキル。

• 大きなテーブルに列や索引を追加したいとき
• 停止を避ける段階的な列名変更
• 既存データを分割更新したいとき

運送会社の選定、運賃交渉、入札、実績評価、貨物の割り当てを支援します。米国の輸送実務を基に、費用・配送品質・輸送力を踏まえた契約や更新の判断を整理します。

• 新しい運送会社の審査
• 輸送業務の入札準備
• 運賃や燃料割増を交渉したいとき

AIが修正したコードで同じ不具合が再発しないよう、APIの必須項目や処理分岐を自動テストで確認し、テストとビルドを先に行うレビュー手順を整えるスキル。

• バグ修正後に再発防止テストを足したいとき
• API応答の必須項目を確認したいとき
• テスト用と本番用の応答を見直したいとき

Design or change REA investigation tools, CLI/MCP contracts, provider capabilities, and Evidence semantics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A contract for what the agent does when a long, messy, stream-of-consciousness ramble arrives (usually voice dictation): act on nothing until the echo brief is approved. The echo audits the entire transfer, mission, locked decisions and constraints, open questions, flips and parked tangents, with the model's inferences and guesses quarantined away from the user's own phrasing, so the user verifies what the model believes, not just what it doubts. Use when the user says "let me think out loud" or wants to ramble a bit before building anything, when a message opens with a speech-to-text preamble like "switching to voice, sorry for typos", when input is a long weakly punctuated stream with restarts and mid-message reversals ("actually no, wait, scrap that idea entirely"), or when the user asks to be interviewed about a fuzzy half-formed idea. Includes an optional capture mode for rambles spread across several messages and an optional targeted interview.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or eslint-disable suppressions, skipped or deleted tests, assertions stripped out, unimplemented stubs, thresholds edited down. Use when no quality bar is written down, when the user says "set up constraints" or "define our standards", when the user wants dimensions they care about — accessibility, web performance, coverage — set up as enforced constraints, when an agent keeps silencing checks or skipping tests to get to green, when you need a coverage or performance threshold and don't know what number to pick, or when an agent writes more code than anyone will read.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints, defining type contracts between modules, or establishing boundaries between frontend and backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages deprecation and migration. Use when removing old systems, APIs, or features. Use when migrating users from one implementation to another. Use when migrating a database schema in production, such as renaming or dropping a column without downtime (expand/contract). Use when deciding whether to maintain or sunset existing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn vague taste, screenshots, URLs, product notes, or "make it feel like this" references into a grounded DESIGN.md plus an implementation handoff. Use it before prototypes, decks, redesigns, or image remix work when the user needs a reusable visual direction rather than a one-off prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve active prediction-market contracts (Polymarket) with live yes-price probabilities, volume, and close dates, filterable by category or keyword. Use when the user asks what the market odds are on a geopolitical, economic, or election outcome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, lifecycle/state, entity-relationship, class/interface, tree, timeline, and execution waterfall diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional motion, and image/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or Mermaid; inspect repository evidence for code-backed diagrams. Use when visualizing infrastructure, cloud/security networks, API calls, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, state machines, database schemas, class contracts, module hierarchies, incident/release histories, or request and agent-run timings. Also use for everyday subjects with steps, parts, relationships, or states: leave and travel plans, applications and approvals, renting conversations, money or document flows, and order progress. Not for numeric charts or dashboards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review invoices and contracts against accounts-payable policy before human approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the SPARC Pseudocode and Architecture phases (2 and 3) — write algorithm pseudocode, design module boundaries and API contracts, then implement

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Snapshot delta between two cost-summary JSON outputs. PR-level cost regression detection — answers "what changed between these two specific snapshots?". Pairs with cost-summary's stable JSON contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify a material user-owned product decision before substantive implementation commitments. Use only when request and named/governing evidence still leave a choice that would materially change scope, platform support, user-facing surface, data/API contract, domain values, project placement, or cross-system architecture; also use when a truncated request omits such a choice. On the initial turn, inspect only named or governing requirements evidence, then ask directly without loading: prefer structured input; ask one blocking outcome question or at most three coupled questions; wait. After the answer, load the body before write or delegation. Do not use for implement/build/fix/debug/refactor work when expected behavior is settled, plan/design deliverables owned by Plan, complexity/greenfield/integration alone, agent-owned technical choices, locally discoverable facts, reversible defaults, permission to begin, or stop/no-tool turns. Never re-ask supplied facts or turn clarification into refusal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

docs (editable docs people share and comment on; the default for any document, named as a doc or not: a document, report, proposal, resume, cover letter, letter, contract, policy, form, template, worksheet, essay, handbook, guide, how-to, cheat sheet, SOP or other writing to keep, share, collaborate on, send, submit, print or sign; a doc exports to Word, PDF, Markdown or Google Docs, so needing a file to send, attach, upload, submit or print is no reason to pick Word, and a file nobody asked for is a doc, not Word; a plan, comparison, summary or notes asked in chat stays in chat; a pasted claude.ai artifact link may be a doc: check with docs tools first; Word or another file format named, tracked changes wanted, or a .docx to change or use as a template → that format's skill): making one → if no docs-connector instructions are in context, call its `guide` (topic.instructions) first; then create the doc (headings only, no body) before any search, file read or plan, even with files attached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate an Agent Skill package and choose the right instruction, capability, or lifecycle primitive before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。