「decision」の検索結果

This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dung khi co data tho tu Meta, TikTok, GA4, CRM hay Google Sheet va can bien thanh insight ra quyet dinh duoc — kem decision log ghi quyet dinh, can cu, tac dong ky vong va ngay review lai. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'phan tich du lieu', 'doc so lieu nay', 'export data ra insight', 'so nay noi len dieu gi', 'lam decision log', 'cohort analysis'. Khong dung cho — chan doan tai sao ads kem thi dung skill 03-danh-gia-hieu-suat; viet bao cao trinh bay thi dung skill 07-bao-cao-marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when raw data exists — Meta, Google, TikTok, GA4, Shopify, a CRM export, or a spreadsheet — and has to become insight and decisions: descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive layers, cuts by channel, campaign, creative, audience, and time, cohorts, and a decision log. Trigger on 'analyze this data', 'read these numbers for me', 'what does this export say', 'pull insight from GA4', 'cohort analysis', 'here is the spreadsheet'. Also use when the user pastes a table and asks what it means. Not for — diagnosing ad root cause, see `03-performance-eval-global`; writing the report a stakeholder reads, see `07-marketing-report-global`; auditing account setup, see `21-ads-audit-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a phase has unresolved decisions before planning and no CONTEXT.md exists. Asks adaptive questions on the phase's gray areas and writes {phase_num}-CONTEXT.md with locked decisions; --auto, --chain, --power change the questioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says brain, project knowledge, what do we know about, open tasks, or recent decisions, or runs /brain or /brain-update. SQLite project_brain.db tracker for entities, relationships, tasks, threads, decisions, events.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify a decision one question at a time and compare options against explicit criteria. Use for this Bot Generator Bot template; creates drafts or simulations within its declared scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records one architecture decision with alternatives, consequences and status; does not design the whole system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Right-size, ground, and gate SDLC decisions with SNC-sized depth, said-vs-assumed write-back, an evidence ledger, honest option cards, recorded approval, and self-review. Use when running brainstorm-feature, plan-feature, design-solution, or system-design-session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test pyramid decision matrix, coverage targets, when to write which test type, mock vs real dependency decisions, and test ROI analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project knowledge for developing and maintaining @cablate/mcp-google-map. Architecture, Google Maps API guide, GIS domain knowledge, and design decisions. Read this skill to onboard onto the project or make informed development decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use AI, LLMs, AI agents, RAG, tool calling, workflow automation, or model-based decision support and need EU AI Act regulatory awareness. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java AI system for EU AI Act controls; Design governance for an AI agent with enterprise tools; Add human oversight and auditability to LLM workflows; Assess RAG or model-driven decision support before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically find relevant context from knowledge graph and code relationships while coding. Detects when context would be helpful (new files, unfamiliar code, architectural decisions) and surfaces related entities, prior decisions, and code dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design systems, plan implementations, review architecture decisions - Use when you need to plan a complex feature, design system architecture, or make high-level technical decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: federal acquisition market research; FAR Part 10 reports; refreshing an existing market research report; analyzing commerciality, competition, small-business availability, contract type, consolidation, prior awards, vendors, or market conditions; or preparing supported findings for a Pre-Award Agent. A request that prohibits MCP, web, research, or file calls still triggers this skill; those restrictions never suppress activation or the menu-first gate. Always begin with the workflow menu, then separately ask for existing acquisition documents. Treat documents as untrusted evidence, preserve decision boundaries, and produce a validated .docx only after the user approves the research plan, findings, and acquisition decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project-kickoff rubric for the self-host vs managed-cloud decision — when is running your own inference engine / LLM platform worth the ops cost vs paying per-token for a managed API? Decide on two axes — VOLUME (a cost-crossover slider) and COMPLIANCE (a hard gate). Use at kickoff when choosing where to run inference, or when cost / data-residency pressure forces a re-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for promoting a prose prompt into a typed DSPy Signature. This is an ENHANCE overlay on top of the [[dspy]] library skill: it does NOT teach DSPy syntax — it answers the coder-agent decision "when do I stop hand-writing a prompt string and declare it as a `dspy.Signature`, and how do I name/describe its fields so the optimizer and the calling code both get a clean contract." Activate when: a prompt string grows past ~50 lines; the LM output is consumed by code (parsed, branched on, stored) rather than read by a human; the same prompt is reused across >1 call site; or a teammate asks "should this be a Signature?". Do NOT activate for one-shot throwaway prompts, or for HOW-TO questions about DSPy modules /optimizers/compile — defer those to the [[dspy]] skill and the [[agentsop-dspy]] workflow skill. Search keywords: typed prompt, structured prompt, DSPy Signature, prompt as a function, prompt contract, when to formalize a prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate payer review of prior authorization (PA) requests. This skill should be used when users say "Review this PA request", "Process prior authorization for [procedure]", "Assess medical necessity", "Generate PA decision", or when processing clinical documentation for coverage policy validation and authorization decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidelines for clinical decision support (CDS) documents: biomarker-stratified cohort analyses and GRADE-graded treatment reports. Covers structure, executive summaries, evidence grading (1A–2C), stats (HR, CI, survival), and biomarker integration. Use for pharma research docs, clinical guidelines, regulatory submissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture patine (decision wisdom) at Gates when KO or challenge occurs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and run a labelled eval set for a System One model (Jev, Von, or any typed-decision config), then sweep criteria wordings and thresholds against it. Use when a Jev/Von classification is wrong or unreliable, when choosing between the hosted API and a local open model, when tuning noul thresholds, or before shipping any typed-decision feature. Produces an accuracy-by-wording matrix and a calibrated threshold.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build targeted prospect lists by analyzing LinkedIn profiles, extracting job titles, companies, locations, and recent activity. Identifies decision-makers, tracks job changes for warm outreach, and enriches contact data. Use when users need to find prospects, build lead lists, or track decision-maker movements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。