663 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Display input/output args, return object and cost time of a Python method invocation in a live process. Use this to observe function behavior at runtime — see what arguments go in, what comes back, and how long it takes. This is the most frequently used diagnostic command.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Executes diagnostic investigation tasks to test debugging hypotheses. Runs tests, traces execution, checks git history, and reports evidence. (converted from agent)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes Claude Project context budget under the automatic-RAG-by-window model: knowledge files vs. threshold-exempt overhead (Skills, MCPs, CI, Memory). Two modes: Quick Diagnostic and Full Budget Audit. Use when user says "check my context budget," "how much context am I using," "is my project too big," "optimize my token usage," "tier my files," "optimize for RAG," "improve retrieval quality," "should I keep compressing," "am I over-compressing," "should I accept RAG mode." Also trigger on context pressure symptoms: "Claude forgets my instructions," "responses getting generic," "content not found in my knowledge files." Also use when a project audit scores Knowledge Architecture ≤ 3. Do NOT use for content placement decisions (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available), full project audits (use rootnode-project-audit if available), or behavioral tuning (use rootnode-behavioral-tuning if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically interpret infrared spectra to identify functional groups present in a sample. Covers diagnostic region analysis (4000-1500 cm-1), fingerprint region assessment (1500-400 cm-1), hydrogen bonding effects, and compilation of a functional group inventory with confidence levels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a C or C++ build uses GCC and needs build-mode flags, warning triage, debug info, LTO, PGO, or a compilation error explained. Not for Clang-only diagnostics: use clang.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a C or C++ build uses clang and needs diagnostics, optimization remarks, clang-tidy, ThinLTO with lld, LLVM PGO, or a GCC-to-Clang migration. Not for LLVM IR work: use llvm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an organic-traffic operating system for any site or app: a multi-phase, resumable engine that plans and ships a BATCH ROADMAP of landing pages (use-cases, playbooks, /for/ pages, roundups) on top of real keyword research, with a persistent phase tracker. Use when the user says 'SEO machine', 'build organic traffic', 'rank on Google', 'we need traffic', 'SEO roadmap', 'batch of pages', 'pages roadmap', or 'build an SEO engine'. Distinct from `seo-audit` (one-off diagnostic) and `seo-content` (single-article writer): this skill owns the multi-page roadmap, run sequencing, page generation, internal linking, and the persistent phase tracker across the whole run. For a single alternatives or vs/comparison page, see /competitor-alternatives; for programmatic SEO templates and content at scale, see /seo-content; for off-page link building, see /off-page-seo. Resumable — every invocation continues the last run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ongoing link-building campaigns that raise domain authority and expand a site's KD ceiling beyond what on-page work alone can earn. Use when the user mentions 'off-page SEO', 'link building', 'directory link building', 'backlink campaign', 'listicle placements', 'guest posts', 'outreach targets', 'get listed in listicles', or asks 'how do I get more domain authority'. Generates a prioritized, researched target list across directories, listicles, and guest-post candidates — does NOT submit anything on the user's behalf. Pairs with `mktg-backlink-prospector` agent for parallel research. For a launch-day push (submit to directories, Product Hunt, BetaList), see /startup-launcher. For measured backlink data — referring domains, backlink counts, rank tracking — see /openseo. Distinct from `seo-machine` (on-page programmatic) and `seo-audit` (technical diagnostic). The off-page half of the SEO operation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user needs official desktop Obsidian CLI Bases or Bookmarks workflows, including base discovery, view/query operations, base item creation, and bookmark management. Keep this skill separate from general note CRUD, runtime admin, Sync/Publish, and devtools diagnostics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user needs official desktop Obsidian CLI workspace, vault, tab, navigation, and utility operations, including workspace save/load/delete, tab and recent-file handling, vault info/listing, random/unique note navigation helpers, web viewer, and wordcount. Keep this skill separate from note CRUD/tasks/properties/history, runtime admin, devtools diagnostics, and Sync/Publish operations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user needs Obsidian runtime administration through official desktop CLI commands for plugins, restricted mode, themes, CSS snippets, command catalog/hotkeys, or targeted command execution. Keep this skill separate from note CRUD, Sync/Publish, and devtools diagnostics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants local Obsidian note or metadata work done primarily through documented official desktop `obsidian` CLI commands, with limited local vault filesystem support when needed for parent folders, path checks, ambiguity resolution, verification, or safe vault structure operations. Best for local vault search, note reads, exact-path note updates, backlinks, tasks, properties, templates, and local history. Do not use it for runtime admin, devtools diagnostics, workspace/navigation administration, community tools, `obsidian://` launcher tasks, Headless Sync or Publish workflows, or plugin-specific APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex needs language-server diagnostics, definitions, references, symbols, or rename safety checks in the current workspace.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks "which SAT should I use for X?", wants the index of Structured Analytic Techniques, or is choosing between quality-of-information-check, ACH, key-assumptions-check, devils-advocacy, indicators of change, etc. Quality of Information Check is the default first step of any diagnostic run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Redistricting analysis in R using the redistverse ecosystem. Use whenever the user is working with redist, redistmetrics, ggredist, geomander, adj, alarmdata, PL94171, censable, easycensus, tinytiger, baf, rict, or redistio. Covers the complete pipeline: Census and spatial data loading, adjacency graph construction, SMC/MCMC simulation, constraints (population balance, county splits, VRA compliance), convergence diagnostics, plan metrics (compactness, partisan fairness, splits), visualization, summary tables, and interactive plan drawing. Invoke whenever the user mentions redistricting, gerrymandering, district plans, simulation ensembles, or any redistverse package by name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Analyze inventory health using turnover ratios, ABC classification, safety stock calculations, and stockout vs overstock diagnostics. Use this skill when the user needs to optimize inventory levels, reduce carrying costs, prevent stockouts, or classify products by inventory priority — even if they say 'we have too much stock', 'we keep running out of bestsellers', 'how much safety stock do we need', or 'which products should we focus on'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when exploring, continuing, or accepting a deep-learning or computer-science research idea. Converts claims into pilot-first experiment matrices covering diagnostics, failure analysis, authorized execution, evaluation, and paper-story viability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and exploit OS Command Injection vulnerabilities where web applications insecurely pass user input into system shell commands. Use this skill when applications feature ping utilities, file conversions, network diagnostics, or PDF generators to execute arbitrary system commands and achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify a proposed code change as Leaf Node or Core Code to decide how much AI usage and review rigor is appropriate. Use this skill whenever the user asks "is this leaf or core", "what kind of change is this", "should I vibe code this", "can AI write this", "how rigorous should the review be", or before starting any non-trivial change. Also useful as a sub-step inside other workflows (planning, PR prep, code review) when classification matters. Asks 6 diagnostic questions about propagation range, change frequency, tech-debt tolerance, examples, failure cost, and review intensity, then outputs a clear classification with the recommended approach. Trigger even when the user describes a change without explicitly asking for classification — the answer changes how they should proceed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Serena code intelligence — LSP-powered symbol navigation, diagnostics, and targeted code surgery. Activate before complex refactors, cross-file analysis, or when graph tools need symbol-level depth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed General Dentist — assessing caries risk and deciding restore-vs-monitor, choosing a restorative material for a specific tooth, phasing a multi-procedure treatment plan by urgency and budget, reading a radiograph for diagnostic findings, or deciding when a case exceeds general-practice scope and needs a specialist referral.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Crushing/Grinding Machine Operator — recognizing that classifier cut point, not mill residence time alone, determines what reports to finished product in a closed-circuit grinding operation, monitoring circulating load as a distinct diagnostic variable, matching grinding media size to the target size reduction, or verifying product size via actual sieve/laser analysis rather than mill parameters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Commercial and Industrial Electronics Repairer — diagnosing a VFD fault trip on a production line, tracing a PLC I/O fault back to the sensor, the wiring, or the ladder logic, selecting arc-flash PPE for live-panel diagnostic work, triaging multiple simultaneous down-lines by downtime-cost-per-hour, or deciding drive/board swap versus component-level repair.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。