「dj」の検索結果

Forecast inventory needs using demand analysis, safety stock calculations, reorder point optimization, and seasonal adjustment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PEG valuation, Price Earnings to Growth ratio, Peter Lynch PEG methodology, growth-adjusted valuation, earnings growth rate, PE ratio valuation, PEG sector comparison, undervalued growth stocks, fair value PEG

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Medicines pipeline analysis over structured universes: Phase I-III assets with probability-of-success discipline (unadjusted peak x POS = modeled value; POS changes logged with reasons), trial status-diff tracking, and mechanism/competitor mapping via drug-knowledge lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Mathematical Physicist. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Physicist judgment. Reasons from Hilbert-space domains, Wightman/OS and Haag–Kastler axioms, constructive QFT, Gibbs measures, and spectral/scattering theory; uses Reed–Simon, Glimm–Jaffe, MathSciNet/math-ph, while treating wrong self-adjoint extensions, invalid Wick rotation, limit-order swaps, and lattice-as-continuum claims as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Immunogeneticist. Use when a task calls for Immunogeneticist judgment. Reasons from HLA/KIR/FcγR diversity, haplotype LD, and epitope immunogenicity; adjudicates NGS typing, imputation fine-mapping, eplet/TCE matching, and DSA/crossmatch artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Dairy Scientist. Use when a task calls for Dairy Scientist judgment. Reasons from the lactation curve, dry matter intake, and rumen health through NASEM Dairy 2021/CNCPS ration formulation, Penn State particle separation, DHIA records, and pen-level mixed models while treating subacute ruminal acidosis, milk fat depression, transition-cow hypocalcemia, and unadjusted DIM/parity confounding as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computer Vision Scientist. Use when a task calls for Computer Vision Scientist judgment. Reasons from image formation, projective geometry (pinhole intrinsics and extrinsics, epipolar/PnP/bundle adjustment, similarity-scale ambiguity), and COCO/LVIS AP mechanics through DINOv3/SigLIP 2 foundation baselines, RF-DETR/YOLO26/SAM 3 models, COLMAP 4/GLOMAP and VGGT geometry, pycocotools/TrackEval/BOP evaluation, and CVPR reporting and EU AI Act limits while treating train–test and pretraining leakage, AP evaluation-setting gaming, preprocessing mismatches (EXIF, BGR, aliased resizing), label noise, and camera-convention and scale errors as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Clinical Pharmacologist. Use when a task calls for Clinical Pharmacologist judgment. Reasons from exposure–response, popPK (NONMEM), DDI (ICH M12), TDM/NTI windows, and renal/hepatic/allometric adjustment; aligns dose finding with ICH E4 and FDA clinical pharmacology labeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select, integrate, and operate multi-model video-generation gateways — hosted inference aggregators such as fal.ai, Replicate, and WaveSpeed that expose many third-party video (and video-adjacent audio) models behind one account, one API surface, and one bill. Use when deciding whether to route video generation through a gateway versus a direct model-provider API; when comparing gateways on catalog, async/queue job design, webhooks, pricing, schema discovery, and version pinning; and when operating gateway workloads in production — spend controls, retries, cross-gateway failover, content- safety differences, data retention, and commercial-rights passthrough of the underlying model. Not for direct model-provider APIs, local/self-hosted inference, model training/fine-tuning, or image-only gateway use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes and interprets treatment effect measures (OR, RR, RD, HR, NNT) with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen, MOVER, profile likelihood, Bender NNT) and reports marginal vs conditional estimands per FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance. Use when reporting treatment effects in confirmatory trials, comparing effect sizes across studies, or constructing forest plots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An inspired interpretation of HP's design language — a white-paper enterprise-consumer system anchored by HP Electric Blue (`#024ad8`) as the lone signal CTA, near-black ink (`#1a1a1a`) for headlines, geometric Forma-DJR sans throughout, and angular blue-chevron decorations that nod to the HP wordmark's slashes. Cards round at 8–16px, photos sit in soft 16px frames, and dark navy slabs anchor the customer-story and "how can we help" closing bands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find academic papers across up to 8 sources (OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar / CrossRef / PubMed / arXiv for English, OpenReview for AI venues, plus native-Chinese retrieval via NSSD 国家哲社文献中心 + yiigle 中华医学期刊) with adjustable depth — Quick scan (5 min) to Audit prep (3 hr). Use when the user wants to find papers, run a literature search, gather references, scope a research topic, search Chinese-language / 中文原生 literature (中文文献/中文核心/CSSCI/C刊/国内研究/国内文献/中华××期刊/心理学报/经济研究), or filter results by journal tier (中科院分区/一区/几区, Q1, JCR/SJR quartile, 影响因子/impact factor, 期刊分区, 顶刊/top journal, '按分区筛'), or export paste-ready professional search strategies / 检索式 for external databases (PubMed / WOS / Scopus / Embase / 知网 CNKI / 万方 / SinoMed — '写检索式', '导出检索式', 'WOS 检索式', '知网专业检索', 'search strategy', 'boolean search strategy'). Triggers on search verbs ('find papers', 'literature search', 'papers about X'), review types ('scoping review', 'systematic review', 'SR prep', 'literature review', 'lit review', 'help me write a lit review'), Chinese ('找文献', '找论文', '论文搜索', '学术检索', '文献检索', '文献综述', '综述前期', '求文献', '中文文献', '中文核心', 'CSSCI', 'C刊', '国内研究', '找中文的'). Outputs Shadcn HTML report + BibTeX/RIS/CSV + PRISMA-S log. Do NOT use for: concept explanations ('what is X' / 'X 是什么', e.g. '影响因子怎么算'), writing ('帮我写' / 'help me write a paragraph'), single-paper interpretation or PDF download with metadata (use paper-downloader-portable), or when the user already has a literature set (use literature-set-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement or refactor Formax tool transcript UI using the Tool UI Blocks (C-lite) pattern (ToolUiBlocks renderer + blocks presenters) to avoid touching many tool presenter files; use when adjusting ⏺/⎿ spacing, indent rules, or migrating additional tools to blocks presenters with targeted Ink/Vitest tests and Codex review before commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage group rooms — create, list, members, add, remove, rename, leave, join, delete — so this session can message several peers at once. A group is a local roster of saved peers; sending to it delivers a private copy to each member. Use to set up or adjust a room, then send to it with the send skill (`send --group NAME`). `<user>` is this session's user directory (absolute path; from init).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

规划、编写、审阅和修复由真实授权素材与 AI 生成镜头混合制作的电影级文旅宣传片。用于文旅短片创意简报、场景图筛选、首帧空间分析、分镜脚本、画面内容提示词、人物动作、导演级运镜、自然动机布光、转场与尾帧衔接、Seedance 2.0/可灵/Midjourney 提示词、生成结果诊断、时间线与合规风险检查；尤其适用于需要写实、辽阔、自由感和角色剧情连续性的项目。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CesiumJS terrain, globe, and environment - TerrainProvider, Globe, sampleTerrain, atmosphere, sky, fog, lighting, shadows, panoramas. Use when configuring terrain providers, querying terrain heights, customizing atmosphere or sky rendering, adding panoramas, or adjusting scene lighting and shadows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds and analyzes 5-10 comparable recent sales to estimate fair market value, calculate price adjustments, and score the property's value proposition

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class character and art style consistency for AI-generated images and videos - ensures visual coherence across series, maintains character identity, and provides rigorous QA before deliveryUse when "character consistency, art style, same character, consistent character, visual continuity, series, turnaround sheet, character sheet, reference image, character bible, style guide, anime character, consistent look, face consistency, outfit consistency, lora training, ip-adapter, flux kontext, visual qa, art quality, generation review, style drift, character drift, character-consistency, art-style, visual-qa, ai-art, image-generation, video-generation, anime, illustration, lora, ip-adapter, flux, midjourney, stable-diffusion" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage Meetings/_inbox/ — move each file to the correct subfolder by finding adjacent/similar notes via qmd, applying learned routing conventions from memory, and confirming with the user.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MEMO-ONLY prior-work overlap advisory: surfaces the two ADVISORY taxonomy signals neither a tool nor a model can decide from the paper alone — ADV-TRIVIAL-COMBINATION (standard A+B+C / 缝合 stapling) and ADV-DUPLICATE-PUBLICATION (repackaged / duplicate submission). The executor RETRIEVES candidate prior work (DBLP fuzzy-title + boolean · WebSearch · WebFetch) from the paper's own title + contribution spans in the evidence ledger; TWO fresh cross-model codex reviewers (one per axis) LAY OUT the overlap side-by-side against each anchored contribution claim. It NEVER rules 'trivial' or 'duplicate' (that is a human judgment) and absence of a match is NOT evidence of originality. Emits novelty-duplication-advisory.memo.md + an info-only findings mirror; carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS novelty-check, reframed from 'is MY idea novel' to 'here is the overlap a reviewer should weigh'. Triggers: "novelty advisory", "duplication check", "prior-work overlap", "is this stapling", "缝合", "查重", "重复发表", "duplicate submission".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checkable-ish surface presentation signals a reviewer notices first — duplicate/near-identical tables, leftover pipeline/template strings, too-few or LLM-looking figures, and page-padding. AUXILIARY ONLY and weak by design: a deterministic pass (tools/check_presentation.py — dup-table + pipeline-artifact) plus a fresh cross-model GROSS-cases-only semantic pass (thin-float, LLM-figure, page-padding), every above-info finding span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json). The adjudicator CAPS everything at minor (SURFACE_ONLY_SKILLS + SURFACE_PATTERNS) — these contribute at most SOFT_FLAGS, never a HARD verdict — default false_positive_risk:high. NOTE: the pure AI writing-STYLE impressions (AI-flavor prose, defensive 'not-X-but-Y' hedging, narrative-arc, jargon-stuffing, invented codenames) MOVED to the zero-verdict-weight AIS track — for those use skills/ai-style-impressions, NOT this. Emits presentation-signals.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "presentation signals", "surface check", "duplicate tables", "排版信号".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Citation-integrity forensics: is every reference real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited work actually supports? Catches hallucinated references (no paper at the claimed arXiv id/DOI/venue, fabricated authors/year), metadata drift (wrong year/venue/version), and wrong-context citations (a real paper cited for a claim it never makes — or argues against). A hot zone for machine-generated papers. Decidable at L0 (text + canonical sources). Span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); the executor gathers canonical facts (DBLP / arXiv / DOI), then one FRESH cross-model thread per cited key proposes findings; reviewer != adjudicator. Emits citation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. Triggers: "citation forensics", "check the references", "hallucinated citations", "wrong-context citation", "verify references", "引用核对".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。