「flags」の検索結果

Adopt Prisma Next into a new project, onto an existing database, or as the first move after a bootstrap tool dropped you into a scaffold. Use for "what can I do with Prisma Next", "what can I do next with Prisma", "where do I start", "what should I do first", "just ran createprisma", "createprisma", "npx createprisma", "npx create-prisma", "first steps", "first query", "I have a scaffolded Prisma Next project what now"; for `pnpm dlx prisma-next init` greenfield setup; and for `prisma-next contract infer` + `db sign` against an existing database. Also covers the connect-write-read first-arc orientation, the day-to-day commands (`contract emit`, `db init`, `db update`, `migration plan`, `migrate`, `db schema`, `db verify`), and routing to `prisma-next-contract` / `prisma-next-queries` / `prisma-next-runtime` for the next move. Flags: --target, --authoring, --schema-path, --probe-db, --output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 2 of the evidence verification pipeline. Validates GitHub star counts in registry skill files against live GitHub API data and flags stale or inflated metrics without repartitioning evidence by rank. Use this after /ev-collection has compiled the unified data lake and before /ev-adversarial-audit begins. Trigger phrases: "verify stars", "check star counts", "refresh stargazer metrics", "run star verification", "ev-star-verification", "Phase 2", "live star check".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a prompt the user is about to send to Claude (or another coding AI) for completeness and effectiveness. Use this skill whenever the user shares a prompt and asks for feedback — phrases like "is this prompt good", "audit my prompt", "review this prompt", "will Claude understand this", "improve this prompt", "is this enough context". Also trigger proactively when you notice the user is about to dispatch a vague, under-specified, or over-constrained prompt for non-trivial work. Checks the 6 essential elements (goal, scope, existing patterns, constraints, verification, done definition), flags what's missing, explains why each gap matters, and produces an improved rewrite. Treat this skill as the litmus test for "Be Claude's PM" — if the prompt fails the audit, the work that follows will probably fail too.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies and bypasses anti-debugging and anti-analysis checks in malware: PEB flags, debugger-detection APIs, timing checks, and exception tricks, then neutralizes them to continue analysis. Activates for requests to identify anti-debugging, bypass anti-debug checks, or analyze evasion that blocks a debugger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a feature or sprint for scope creep by comparing current scope against the original plan. Flags additions, quantifies bloat, and recommends cuts. Use when user says 'any scope creep', 'scope review', 'are we staying in scope'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided, section-by-section authoring of the master architecture document for the game. Reads all GDDs, the systems index, existing ADRs, and the engine reference library to produce a complete architecture blueprint before any code is written. Engine-version-aware: flags knowledge gaps and validates decisions against the pinned engine version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function API shape, flags, dependencies, mutability, construction, or command/function trade-offs, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a chiropractor — screening a spinal or musculoskeletal complaint for red flags before manipulation, choosing a manipulation technique given a patient's risk profile, designing a care plan with a defined reassessment checkpoint, or deciding whether to continue, modify, or discharge a course of care.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an astronomer — calculating exposure time or signal-to-noise for a target, writing the feasibility math for a telescope-time proposal, reducing photometric or spectroscopic data, distinguishing a systematic error floor from statistical noise, or reviewing an observational result for calibration or upper-limit red flags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate ENCODE experiment quality using standard metrics and audit flags. Use when the user asks about data quality, wants to filter for high-quality experiments, needs to interpret quality metrics (FRiP, NSC, RSC, NRF, IDR, TSS enrichment, fragment size), wants to understand ENCODE audit warnings, needs to compare quality across experiments, or is deciding whether data is usable for their analysis. Also use when the user mentions QC, quality control, or data filtering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deletes merged git branches (local and remote) and flags stale unmerged branches for manual review. Use when user mentions "cleanup branches", "delete merged branches", "prune old branches", "remove stale branches", "branch cleanup", or runs /cleanup-branches command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flagship comprehensive SEO audit combining Ahrefs and GSC data in sequential waves with checkpoint saves. Use when user says "site audit pro", "full audit", "comprehensive audit", "audit with live data", "deep audit", "pro audit", "complete SEO audit", "run a full site audit", or "audit everything for this domain". Requires domain param. Optional: site param for GSC overlay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-publish (or retroactive) content-quality gate implementing Google's official self-assessment questions from the creating-helpful-content doc, plus 2024 spam-policy red flags. Verdict: PUBLISH / REVISE / RETHINK. Use when user says "helpful content", "people-first", "content self-assessment", "is my content helpful", or "content quality gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares Go applications to work effectively with AI coding agents. Use when setting up a new Go project or retrofitting an existing one to ensure: structured JSON logging (slog/Zap/ZeroLog/Logrus), machine-readable command output, thorough golangci-lint configuration, non-interactive CLI design with --yes flags, structured error handling with meaningful exit codes, proper context.Context propagation, graceful shutdown, health check endpoints, and a standardized Makefile. Triggers when a user asks to make their Go app "agent-ready," "AI-friendly," wants to improve agent tooling/observability in a Go project, or needs to audit an existing Go project against agent-readiness best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building CLI tools, implementing argument parsing, or adding interactive prompts. Invoke for parsing flags and subcommands, displaying progress bars and spinners, generating bash/zsh/fish completion scripts, CLI design, shell completions, and cross-platform terminal applications using commander, click, typer, or cobra.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare for fundraising due diligence — runs CTO, CFO, CPO, sales, and codebase health reviews to produce a consolidated investor brief with scorecard, red flags, and strengths. Use before Series A, seed round, acqui-hire evaluation, or board presentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and interpret financial statements to surface performance signals, quality concerns, and red flags. Use when an accountant says "review these financials", "analyze the income statement", "look at the balance sheet", "what does the cash flow statement tell us", "check the financial health", "ratio analysis", "are the earnings real", "working capital review", "does this company have liquidity issues", or needs to interpret any of the three core financial statements - even if they don't explicitly say "financial statement review". Also trigger when someone shares P&L, balance sheet, or cash flow data and asks what it means.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze customer health signals, identify churn risk flags, and generate an intervention playbook. Use when user says "churn risk", "customer at risk", "red account", "at-risk customer", "health score dropped", "renewal at risk", "customer going dark", "cancel risk", or "what's wrong with this account" - even if they don't say "churn" explicitly. Applies to CSMs triaging accounts or building proactive retention workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate existing blog posts into one or more target languages with SEO-optimized localization. Produces native-quality translations that preserve markdown structure, frontmatter, schema JSON-LD, image and chart embeds, and evidence-backed explanations. Localizes keywords, meta tags, numbers, dates, currencies, and quote styles per locale. Flags machine-translation artifacts for review. Run BEFORE blog-localize: this handles language conversion; localize handles cultural adaptation after translation completes. Use when user says "translate blog", "blog translate", "uebersetzen", "traduire", "traducir", "translate post", "blog auf Deutsch", "blog en espanol".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a directory of multilingual blog content for completeness, consistency, hreflang correctness, meta-tag parity, and freshness. Builds a translation coverage matrix, flags stale translations, validates hreflang and schema, and emits a prioritized report with runnable fix commands. Use when user says "locale audit", "blog locale-audit", "check translations", "multilingual audit", "translation check", "hreflang check", "Uebersetzungen pruefen".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mounts Cloud Storage buckets as a POSIX file system with Cloud Storage FUSE (gcsfuse). Use when interacting with gcsfuse: decide whether FUSE, native gs:// reads, or Filestore/Managed Lustre fits a workload, deploy tuned mounts on GKE, Compute Engine, or Cloud Run, enable and size file, stat, and list caches, tune mount flags or config-file settings, apply workload profiles, keep ML checkpointing safe (rename atomicity, hierarchical namespace/HNS, close-time finalization, concurrent writers), or diagnose slow training, low throughput, or bill spikes with gcsfuse metrics. Covers mount semantics, gcsfuse CLI and config files, GKE gcsfuse CSI driver (Workload Identity principal:// bindings, profile StorageClasses, sidecar sizing), and Cloud Run volume mounts. Don't use for bucket administration or data management without a mount (google-cloud-storage-basics) or fully POSIX-compliant shared file systems (Filestore, Managed Lustre).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides safety-critical validation, guardrails, and data reduction for gcloud CLI operations across Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services and infrastructure. Use when planning, generating, constructing, proposing, describing, or executing any gcloud CLI commands - including when answering questions about gcloud syntax, or formatting flags. Don't use when writing Google Cloud client library code or raw REST/gRPC API requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。