1,178 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Traffic analysis and PCAP forensics playbook. Use when analyzing network captures including Wireshark filters, protocol analysis (HTTP/DNS/FTP/SMTP/USB/WiFi), data extraction, covert channel detection, PCAP repair, TLS decryption, and tshark command-line analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
WAF bypass methodology and generic evasion techniques. Use when a web application firewall blocks injection payloads (SQLi, XSS, RCE) and you need to craft bypasses using encoding, protocol-level tricks, or WAF-specific weaknesses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HTTP/2 protocol-specific attack playbook. Use when the target supports HTTP/2 and you need to exploit binary framing, HPACK compression, h2c upgrade smuggling, pseudo-header injection, stream multiplexing abuse, or H2→H1 downgrade translation flaws.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
401/403 bypass playbook. Use when encountering access-denied responses on admin panels, API endpoints, or restricted paths. Covers path manipulation, HTTP method tampering, header injection, protocol downgrade, and automated bypass tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DeFi attack pattern playbook. Use when analyzing flash loan attacks, price oracle manipulation, MEV sandwich attacks, governance exploits, bridge vulnerabilities, and token standard edge cases in decentralized finance protocols.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Use when the user mentions "Steve Jobs review", "design review", "product review", "what would Steve do", "insanely great", "this feels too complicated", "too many features", "product taste", "saying no", or "is this good enough to ship". Also trigger when critiquing a UI, feature, or roadmap for focus and simplicity, cutting scope to the essential, or pressure-testing the whole experience from first run to daily use. Covers the simplicity audit, the no list, design-is-how-it-works, end-to-end ownership, demo culture, and a Jobs-style review protocol with binary verdicts. For visual design fundamentals, see refactoring-ui. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics. For detail polish, see microinteractions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize web performance through network protocols, resource loading, and browser rendering internals. Use when the user mentions "my site is slow", "Core Web Vitals", "HTTP/2 or HTTP/3", "resource hints", "network latency", "render blocking", "TCP/TLS optimization", "service worker", "Cache-Control or caching strategy", or "critical rendering path". Also trigger when diagnosing slow page loads, optimizing time to first byte, choosing between WebSocket and SSE, or reducing bundle sizes. For UI visual performance, see refactoring-ui. For font loading, see web-typography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers - discover, analyze, and execute tools/prompts/resources from configured MCP servers. Use when working with MCP integrations, need to discover available MCP capabilities, filter MCP tools for specific tasks, execute MCP tools programmatically, access MCP prompts/resources, or implement MCP client functionality. Supports intelligent tool selection, multi-server management, and context-efficient capability discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic debugging frameworks for finding and fixing bugs - includes root cause analysis, defense-in-depth validation, and verification protocols
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This workflow, known as RIPER-5, is designed exclusively for handling complex software engineering tasks such as system design, architectural refactoring, bug diagnosis, performance optimization, and multi-component integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OMC agent catalog, available tools, team pipeline routing, commit protocol, and skills registry. Auto-loads when delegating to agents, using OMC tools, orchestrating teams, making commits, or invoking skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run inference on Fireworks AI — direct, through the Leanmcp AI Gateway proxy (aigateway.leanmcp.com) for observability, or via LiteLLM / the OpenAI SDK / raw HTTP. Covers the endpoint-and-key matrix for each route, serverless vs dedicated deployments and their cold starts, browsing and filtering the model catalogue, reasoning models that return content:null with the answer in reasoning_content, function calling, concurrency and load testing, and runner scripts where many models share one protocol with a --use-proxy toggle. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Fireworks, FIREWORKS_API_KEY, api.fireworks.ai, fireworks_ai/ model ids, accounts/fireworks/models/..., a Fireworks deployment id, the Leanmcp gateway or LEANMCP_API_KEY, app.leanmcp.com observability, or gpt-oss / kimi / glm / qwen / deepseek served on Fireworks; wants to route LLM calls through a proxy for logging or cost tracking; is debugging empty responses, 404s, scope errors, cold starts, or "the gateway isn't working"; wants to pick a Fireworks model with tool calling; or wants to sweep several models over one benchmark. Reach for it even on vague asks like "why is this model returning nothing" or "set up inference for these models" when Fireworks is in play.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add file-based observability, tracing, and run analysis to LLM/agent experiments — per-turn transcripts, tool calls and results, reasoning traces, token/cost accounting, per-episode artifacts, plus terminal viewers and a run-comparison report. Platform-agnostic: one small adapter covers OpenAI, Gemini/Vertex, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Tinker, vLLM, or any custom inference stack, and the same tooling then works unchanged. Use this skill whenever the user wants observability, tracing, logging, or run tracking for model experiments; asks why an agent failed a task or wants to replay/debug/diff an episode; wants to compare models, arms, or ablations; wants to instrument a new folder, repo, or platform ("add observability here", "do the same for Tinker/Gemini/OpenAI"); wants to import or tie in existing experiment results so old runs show up alongside new ones; or wants eval runner scripts where many models share one protocol. Reach for this even when they only say "log what the model is doing", "I can't tell what happened in this run", or "set up traces for this experiment".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply when refactoring, evaluating diff size, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Xiaodu smart device control skill via MCP protocol. Control Xiaodu devices and ecosystem hardware for smart home IoT tasks, scene automation, and physical interaction. Use when user wants to control smart home devices or IoT equipment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
基于协议的依赖注入，用于可测试的Swift代码——使用聚焦协议和Swift Testing模拟文件系统、网络和外部API。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates a systematic review and meta-analysis workflow following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, from protocol development through multi-database search, screening, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Use when conducting evidence-based reviews, meta-analyses, or scoping revi...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assists researchers with Institutional Review Board (IRB) application tasks, including drafting informed consent documents, reviewing research protocols for compliance, generating application forms, and preparing submission checklists. Use when the user mentions IRB, Instituti...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans sample size estimation logic, power assumptions, feasibility checks, and fallback enrollment strategies for clinical and translational study protocols.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs internal, external, temporal, and functional validation strategies at the protocol stage for medical research studies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。