717 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Post-registry-merge steps for a new warp route deployment. Adds the warp route ID to warpIds.ts, updates .registryrc to latest registry commit, runs update-agent-config, then guides the user through warp monitor deployment and PR creation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quantify cyber risk using FAIR methodology with Monte Carlo simulation, assess control effectiveness against NIST CSF/CIS/ISO 27001 frameworks, evaluate risk appetite alignment, and analyze cyber insurance coverage adequacy. Covers threat landscape mapping, asset valuation, loss event frequency and magnitude estimation, annualized loss expectancy calculation, control gap analysis with ROI ranking, residual risk assessment, and insurance policy gap modeling at 90th/95th/99th percentile loss scenarios. Use when building risk registers, preparing board-level risk dashboards, evaluating security investment priorities, assessing cyber insurance coverage, or auditing any organization's risk quantification maturity per NIST RMF, ISO 27005, or FAIR standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add a viewer, configure a viewer, change viewer options, find viewer, close viewer, view a scatter plot, bar chart, histogram, line chart, box plot, pie chart, heat map, correlation plot, 3D scatter, trellis, density plot, statistics, on a Datagrok TableView via the datagrok_exec tool. Use whenever the user asks to plot, chart, visualize, show a graph, draw a distribution, color by a column, swap a viewer's axis, toggle a legend / regression line / log scale, replace one viewer with another, close every chart, reset the view to just the grid, or find an existing viewer by type. Plugin viewers like "Chem space", "sequence space", "activity cliffs" are NOT viewer types — they're registered functions — route those to `grok.functions.call`. Does NOT cover filtering (separate skill `datagrok-filtering`), selection (`datagrok-selection`), grid cell rendering (`datagrok-grid-customization`), layout save/restore, or custom-viewer authoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bioactivity and small-molecule data-side catalog. Covers ChEMBL search/lookup, MolTrack compound and batch registration, HitTriage / HitDesign / PeptiHit workflows, and Curves dose-response analysis (IC50/EC50 fitting). Open this skill when the user asks about querying ChEMBL, registering or looking up compounds in MolTrack, running a hit-triage campaign, or fitting/inspecting dose-response curves.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a Diff Studio demo model TS file and register it in the package, using equations from an IVP file
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a Diff Studio demo model TS file and register it in the package, using equations from an IVP file. Use this skill when the user wants to create a demo model from an IVP file, mentions "demo model", "IVP file", "Diff Studio demo", or asks to convert an .ivp file into a demo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translation and interpretation as language meta-skills -- equivalence theory (Nida's formal vs. dynamic equivalence), translation strategies (borrowing, calque, transposition, modulation, adaptation), interpretation modes (simultaneous, consecutive, sight), source text analysis, register preservation, cultural adaptation, untranslatability and compensatory strategies, machine translation literacy, and back-translation for verification. Covers literary, technical, legal, and community interpreting contexts. Use when translating between languages, evaluating translation quality, teaching translation skills, or understanding the limits of cross-linguistic transfer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pragmatics and communicative competence across languages -- speech acts (Austin/Searle), Grice's conversational maxims and implicature, politeness theory (Brown & Levinson), face-threatening acts, discourse structure, turn-taking, repair strategies, register and formality, cross-cultural communication, communicative strategies (circumlocution, approximation, appeal for assistance), and the gap between grammatical competence and communicative performance. Use when teaching communication skills, analyzing cross-cultural misunderstandings, building conversational fluency, or understanding why grammatically correct sentences can be pragmatically inappropriate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and analysis of combinational and sequential digital circuits using Boolean algebra, truth tables, K-maps, CMOS gate implementation, flip-flops, registers, counters, and finite state machines. Covers De Morgan's theorems, canonical sum-of-products and product-of-sums forms, minimization techniques, propagation delay, setup and hold times, metastability, synchronous design discipline, and FSM encoding. Use when designing, minimizing, verifying, or debugging any circuit whose signals take only discrete logic values.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform STRIDE threat modeling for each component and trust boundary and produce a threat register. Use when reviewing a feature for security.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Integrate MDMA into an application and build features with it — wire up parsing, the runtime store, React rendering, LLM streaming, custom components, prompts, and CI validation. Use this skill when the user asks to add MDMA to an app, build a chat that streams MDMA, author or maintain a custom prompt, validate MDMA documents, register a custom component, or expose MDMA to an agent via MCP. Generates focused, correct wiring that uses the right packages for the job instead of reinventing them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Attiya-Bar-Noy-Dolev atomic register emulation over message-passing. Load when designing quorum-based distributed storage, proving linearizability, or reasoning about fault-tolerant shared memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decomposes a contextualized plan into atomic, independently executable tasks with complete embedded context, registered through the plan API. Use after SAM Stage 3 Context Integration produces the contextualized plan artifact — when the plan is ready for task generation with CLEAR ordering, CoVe checks, and dependency graphs for parallel execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grooms a GitHub milestone for parallel execution — batch-grooms ungroomed items, assesses scope gaps, analyzes cross-item dependencies via Impact Radius overlap, builds conflict groups, assigns items to execution waves, and persists the dispatch plan via dispatch_create_plan MCP tool. Calls dispatch_wave_start per wave to register state. Use when preparing a milestone for /work-milestone execution. Pass the milestone number as the first argument. Requires milestone items assigned via /group-items-to-milestone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the PLAN artifact from SAM Stage 2 needs contextualization against actual codebase state — grounds the design plan in reality by performing scope analysis (NEW/MODIFY/COMPLETE classification), conflict detection between plan assumptions and codebase patterns, and resource mapping to concrete file paths and integration points. Produces an updated ARTIFACT:PLAN registered via MCP with a Contextualization section appended.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for architecture review, dependency graphs, coupling analysis, or circular dependency detection. Establishes project module namespaces and traces imports plus Claude plugin hook, skill, script, PEP 723, and MCP boundaries. Emits partitioned Mermaid graphs with cycle, coupling, and ownership signals; verifies contract and consequence before assigning severity. Registers diagrams as codebase-analysis artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a concise Product Development Requirement and one or more implementation-sized YYLO Ledger tasks when the user explicitly asks to plan or register work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits fielded survey-response data for registered elements, data quality, bot and AI-automation screening, and sample integrity, and produces an appendix-ready quality report. Use at soft launch before full field, after fielding before outcomes are analyzed, or when asked what a study did about bots and AI respondents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a theory into falsifiable, pre-registerable hypotheses, covering the DGP and DAG, identification, SATE versus PATE, counterfactual and directional framing, named estimands, justified SESOIs, the choice among NHST, equivalence, interval, and minimum-effect tests, scope conditions, and primary, secondary, and exploratory tiers. Use when the user asks to turn a research question or theory into hypotheses, whether a prediction is falsifiable, what the estimand is, or how to predict a null. Framing goes to narrative-building, the plan to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes or reviews a pre-analysis plan before data collection — registry choice (OSF, AEA RCT Registry, AsPredicted, registered reports), PAP structure, models and decision rules locked in advance, analysis code run on simulated data, contingencies for attrition, failed manipulations, and exclusions, deviation records, and timeline. Operationalizes the pre-data-collection side of DA-RT. Use when the user asks to draft or audit a pre-registration or PAP, choose a registry, decide what to lock versus leave exploratory, or handle a later deviation. Hypotheses and estimands come from hypothesis-building, post-hoc reporting from methods-reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans a research project as a durable decision map, resolving one design decision per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation holds, or when planning keeps restarting. Not for running analyses or writing the paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes or reviews a pre-analysis plan before data collection: registry choice (OSF, AEA, AsPredicted, registered reports), locked models and decision rules, code run on simulated data, contingencies, and deviation records. Use when drafting or auditing a pre-registration or PAP, choosing a registry, or handling a deviation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit fielded survey response data for registered elements, data quality, bot and AI-automation screening, and sample integrity, and emit an appendix-ready quality report. Use at soft launch or after fielding, before outcomes are analyzed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。