4,638 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Wrap getTokenOptimizer().getCompactContext() to retrieve compacted ReasoningBank context for cost-analysis queries; report bridge-reported tokensSaved
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a cost report showing token usage and USD costs by agent and model
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only GitHub triage for issues AND PRs. 1 item = 1 background task (category: quick). Analyzes all open items and writes evidence-backed reports to /tmp/{datetime}/. Every claim requires a GitHub permalink as proof. NEVER takes any action on GitHub - no comments, no merges, no closes, no labels. Reports only. Triggers: 'triage', 'triage issues', 'triage PRs', 'github triage'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a high-signal bug issue or PR in the repo that owns the defect. Use this whenever the user asks to report, file, open, or triage a LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, Codex plugin, or upstream Codex CLI bug, especially when they need source-backed root cause, reproduction steps, fix guidance, and GitHub routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix security vulnerabilities found by a Strix pentest (open-source CLI or app.strix.ai cloud) — triage by severity, patch the root cause rather than the symptom, and re-run Strix to prove each fix actually closes the exploit. Handles injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control, IDOR, and other validated findings. Use after a Strix scan reports findings, or when the user asks to remediate, patch, or fix security issues from a strix_runs report, vulnerabilities.json, findings.sarif, or a cloud scan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a report about a video
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to figure out which marketing actually drives conversions and revenue, choose or interpret an attribution model, or reconcile conflicting numbers across tools. Also use when the user mentions "attribution," "attribution model," "first-touch vs last-touch," "multi-touch," "which channel drives revenue," "what's my real CAC," "my dashboards disagree," "Google/Meta says X but GA says Y," "media mix model," "MMM," "incrementality," "geo lift," "holdout test," "how did you hear about us," "self-reported attribution," "dark social," or wants to instrument attribution themselves — "stitch my bookings to their source," "SavvyCal/Calendly attribution," "close the identify gap," "track conversions on a third-party domain," "first-party / self-hosted attribution." For event tracking setup and UTMs, see analytics. For ad-platform pixels/CAPI, see ads. For pipeline and CRM revenue reporting, see revops. For the AI-search attribution blind spot, see ai-seo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a topic to support a decision, three ways: draft a research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), turn a finished research report into a short summary with cited sources that other skills can use directly, or run the research here with parallel web searches. Built-in research types: market, domain, technical, competitive, user-voice, academic-lit; also supports choosing between candidates, and custom types via overrides. Use when the user says "deep recon", "research this", "draft a research prompt", "process this research report", "market research", "domain research", "technical research", "competitor research", "literature review", or "help me choose between"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
只在用户明确要求提交 GitHub Issue、GitHub Bug Report 或 GitHub Feature Request 时使用。用户只说“提交问题”“提交反馈”“上报 bug”“这是个 bug”或描述功能建议但未点名 GitHub 时不得触发，必须改用 cherry-studio-feedback 并默认提交飞书。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Protocol-driven study screening for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews. Turns a proposal or PROSPERO protocol into confirmed eligibility rules, then screens titles/abstracts and full texts with two blinded AI reviewers and a third-reviewer adjudicator: ordered exclusion codes, no silent defaults, resumable batch runs, QC (seed studies, near-miss rechecks, kappa and PABAK), PRISMA 2020 counts, EndNote/Zotero RIS groups, an Excel log, a methods draft and a literature_corpus handoff to academic-paper. Reads RIS, PubMed .nbib, Web of Science and CSV exports; removes duplicates. 8 modes: protocol, quick, pilot, ta-screen, ft-screen, adjudicate, audit, report. Use it to screen records against eligibility criteria, pilot screening, resolve screening conflicts, audit exclusions or report the selection process. Triggers on: screen these papers, title/abstract screening, full-text screening, screening conflicts, inclusion criteria, PRISMA flow, غربالگری مقالات, اسکرینینگ عنوان و چکیده, معیارهای ورود و خروج.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts, revises, and audits scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates safety-bounded draft structures and runs local deterministic checks for clinical case, diagnostic, trial, safety, and aggregate research reports. Use only with synthetic, de-identified, or aggregate inputs and verified source-fact manifests; every output requires qualified review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers direct-CDP live-DOM auditing; falls back to a browser-MCP composition or HTML-string audits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when summarizing agent evaluations where autonomous, assisted, failed, timed-out, or invalid outcomes must remain distinct and comparable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conventions and review steps for writing analytics SQL against the warehouse. Use whenever the task involves querying tables, building a report, or aggregating metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates task-oriented technical documentation with progressive disclosure. Use when writing READMEs, API docs, architecture docs, or markdown documentation. Also use this skill at the END of any completed reverse engineering, penetration testing, CTF, or security analysis task to generate a formal report in the user's project directory. Trigger keywords: 写报告, 写文档, 出报告, writeup, 技术文档, report, documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create comprehensive industry and sector landscape reports covering market dynamics, competitive positioning, key players, and thematic trends. Use for client requests, sector initiations, thematic research pieces, or internal knowledge building. Triggers on "sector overview", "industry report", "market landscape", "sector analysis", "industry deep dive", or "thematic research".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create professional equity research earnings update reports (8-12 pages, 3,000-5,000 words) analyzing quarterly results for companies already under coverage. Fast-turnaround format focusing on beat/miss analysis, key metrics, updated estimates, and revised thesis. Includes 1-3 summary tables and 8-12 charts. Use when user requests "earnings update", "quarterly update", "earnings analysis", "Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 results", or post-earnings report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate an explorable HTML report of Claude Code session usage (tokens, cache, subagents, skills, expensive prompts) from ~/.claude/projects transcripts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional financial research report generation — standard structure (summary / views / main body / risks / recommendation), Markdown formatting standards, rating system, and terminology guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before opening a PR, or whenever asked to self-review a diffusers contribution. Applies the same rubric as the `@claude` CI (checks the diff against references/review-rules.md, traces call paths for dead code). Reports findings grouped by severity, flagging what to fix before submitting (blocking issues + dead code) vs what to leave for the actual review. Report-only — does not edit files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Respond to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, sandboxing URLs/attachments, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages organization-wide, and remediating affected accounts. Use when investigating a reported phishing or credential-phishing email, a suspected spearphishing incident, or when a mailbox-wide purge and account remediation is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。