982 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Dynamic model selection based on task complexity scoring. Replaces static model mappings with a weighted signal system that picks Opus, Sonnet, or Haiku-class speed per task. Works with agent-assignment-matrix.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent reputation scoring, performance tier system, trust calibration, and task affinity matching
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mathematically rigorous Socratic interview system that drives ambiguity below 20% before any code is written. One question per message, weighted ambiguity scoring, brownfield-aware, outputs a complete PRD. Replaces discovery-interview with a stricter protocol.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instinct-based learning system that observes sessions via hooks, creates atomic instincts with confidence scoring, and evolves them into skills/commands/agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Final arbiter for Bug Hunter. Receives Hunter findings and Skeptic challenges, independently re-reads code, and delivers authoritative verdicts with CVSS scoring and proof-of-concept generation for security findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screen the direction pool with a discussion-first scoring pass, writing `output/trace/IDEA_SCREENING_TABLE.md`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dependency auditing, CVE detection, configuration security review, CVSS scoring, and prioritized vulnerability reporting
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cyber threat intelligence production — the intelligence cycle, IOC extraction/normalization/enrichment, STIX/TAXII and MISP, structured analytic models (Diamond, Kill Chain, ATT&CK), source scoring, actor/campaign tracking, and finished intelligence reporting
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to analyze Java profiling data collected during the detection phase — including interpreting flamegraphs, memory allocation patterns, CPU hotspots, threading issues, systematic problem categorization, evidence documentation with profiling-problem-analysis and profiling-solutions markdown files, or prioritizing fixes using Impact/Effort scoring. This should trigger for requests such as Analyze JFR profile; Analyze the profile; Analyze the performance; Analyze the memory; Analyze the threading; Analyze GC logs from profiling; Prioritize Java profiling bottlenecks by impact. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply structured thinking before coding. Use when: starting new features, making architectural decisions, refactoring large components, or evaluating implementation approaches. Includes Musk's 5-step algorithm and ICE scoring framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the BZD mathematical-modeling Skills across problem reading, idea generation, model selection, paper drafting, section checks, final format/AIGC audits and judge-style scoring. Use when a user wants one entry point, an end-to-end competition workflow, the next appropriate Skill, or coordinated processing of a problem and paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the model establishment, numerical solution, result analysis, model validation, and sensitivity or robustness sections of a mathematical-modeling paper against the complete problem. Use for core-model-section diagnosis, not automatic full-paper scoring or unsupported recomputation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review mathematical modeling competition papers from a complete problem and paper, with an optional strict bzd-paper-format-checker audit, itemized problem-specific scoring, a bottom-up low-score safeguard, and CUMCM award calibration by problem type, division, region, school and advisor. Generate a Chinese HTML judge report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decomposed, multi-criteria metric design for LLM pipelines. The metric IS the model — change the metric and the optimizer changes behavior. Decompose by default; bool during compile, float during eval; calibrate against human; mitigate judge bias. Search keywords: LLM-as-judge, llm as judge, eval metric, evaluation score, scoring function, rubric, RAGAS, G-Eval, judge bias, verbosity bias, how to evaluate LLM output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tax-loss harvesting opportunity identification, scoring, and planning with wash sale compliance and annual carryforward tracking
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building durable AI agents or agentic workflows with Inngest and AgentKit, including model calls, tool calls, multi-agent networks, human approval, realtime progress, provider rate limits, crash-safe execution, and Agent Evals handoff. Covers AgentKit, `step.ai`, `step.run`, `step.waitForEvent`, native realtime, and when to use lower-level Inngest primitives instead of an in-memory agent loop. Use `inngest-agent-evals` with this skill when the user wants scoring, sessions, experiments, deferred scorers, or outcome-based evaluation for the agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JASPAR 2024 TF binding profiles via REST API and pyJASPAR. Retrieve PFMs/PWMs by TF name, JASPAR ID, species, or structural class. Scan DNA for TFBS; browse by taxon (human, mouse) or TF family (bHLH, zinc finger). Use for motif enrichment input, TFBS scanning, and regulatory sequence analysis. For ChIP-seq peak motif discovery use homer-motif-analysis; for regulatory variant scoring use regulomedb-database.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ENCODE Portal REST API for regulatory genomics: TF ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq/DNase-seq peaks, histone marks, and RNA-seq across 1000+ cell types. Search experiments by assay/biosample/target; download BED/bigWig; retrieve SCREEN cCREs by region or gene. Use to annotate variants with regulatory tracks, find open chromatin in a cell type, or fetch peak files for ChIP/ATAC analysis. For regulatory variant scoring use regulomedb-database; for GWAS associations use gwas-database.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured peer review of manuscripts and grants. 7-stage evaluation: initial assessment, section review, statistical rigor, reproducibility, figure integrity, ethics, writing. Covers CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA and report structure. For evidence quality see scientific-critical-thinking; scoring see scholar-evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persistent compounding memory for AI agents. 5 default MCP tools: session_start, session_end, remember, recall, check. Full surface: 6 tools with --full (adds check_action); 13 tools with AR_EXTRAS=1 --full. Two-verb model: inhale (session_start) and exhale (session_end). Correction-first memory with decision trail tracking, watch_for warnings, palace rooms with salience scoring, cross-project insight matching, same-day journal merging, ambient recall hooks. Local markdown only. Zero cloud, zero telemetry, Obsidian-compatible. Optional Supabase backend: when configured via `ar setup supabase`, recall() uses pgvector cosine similarity on OpenAI/Voyage embeddings instead of keyword search — same API, semantic understanding. Gracefully degrades to local search if not configured.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate WooAIAssistant against a structured scenario suite with hard invariants + LLM-as-judge rubric scoring. Runs live against the demo store + gpt-5.1 via the woo-mobile-ai backend wrapper, writes a JSONL run record, compares against stored baselines, and surfaces regressions. Always delegated to a subagent so the main context only sees the markdown report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Train ML models on Databricks. Use for: classification/regression/deep-learning (XGBoost, scikit-learn, LightGBM, PyTorch) with Optuna, @prod/@challenger aliases, batch scoring (spark_udf for plain models, fe.score_batch for feature-store-backed), custom PyFunc, custom ResponsesAgent (LangGraph + UC Function/Vector Search); UC feature tables + FeatureLookup + point-in-time joins + Lakebase online store; declarative Feature Views (create_feature, DeltaTableSource, RollingWindow/SlidingWindow/TumblingWindow, materialize_features, streaming Kafka features). NOT for: endpoint ops (databricks-model-serving), MLflow evaluation (databricks-mlflow-evaluation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate technical options with scoring matrix, trigger Gate 4 for significant decisions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。