「security」の検索結果

Detect and block spearphishing emails that use personalized, researched content to evade generic spam filters, by configuring email security gateway (SEG) impersonation protection, URL rewriting, attachment sandboxing, and custom detection rules in Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda. Use when hardening a mail gateway against targeted phishing or investigating a suspected spearphishing campaign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect Layer 2 ARP poisoning/spoofing by deploying ARPWatch, Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI), Wireshark packet analysis, and custom Python monitoring scripts that flag gratuitous ARP floods, IP-to-MAC mapping changes, and duplicate IP addresses. Use when investigating suspected man-in-the-middle interception or session hijacking on a local network segment, or when building layer-2 anomaly detection for a SOC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and prevent dependency confusion (public-over-private package name resolution) in npm, PyPI, and Maven by enumerating claimable internal package names with tools like `confused` and OWASP `dep-scan`, then enforcing source restrictions via `.npmrc`, `pip.conf`/`pyproject.toml`, and Maven `settings.xml`. Use when onboarding a repo to a supply-chain security program, auditing lockfiles/manifests for confusable dependencies, or after an incident that may have leaked internal package names.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill covers detecting cyber attacks targeting Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems including man-in-the-middle attacks on industrial protocols, unauthorized command injection into PLCs, HMI compromise, historian data manipulation, and denial-of-service against control system communications. It leverages OT-specific intrusion detection systems, industrial protocol anomaly detection, and process data analytics to identify attacks that traditional IT security tools miss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys and operates Falco with the modern eBPF driver in Kubernetes and Docker, covering driver selection, Helm installation, output channels, and the built-in ruleset that detects container escape, namespace abuse, privileged mounts, and anomalous syscalls. Use when standing Falco up on a cluster, choosing between the eBPF and kernel-module drivers, routing Falco alerts into a SIEM or Falcosidekick, or upgrading an existing deployment. Keywords: Falco, modern_ebpf, kernel module, Helm, Falcosidekick, runtime security, syscall. Do not use for authoring individual escape rules - use detecting-container-escape-with-falco-rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and defend against indirect prompt injection hidden in web pages, documents, and images consumed by an agent, via content extraction (HTML/PDF/OCR), normalization, and scanning with LLM Guard's PromptInjection scanner or Hugging Face Prompt Guard 2. Use when an agent ingests untrusted external content and you need to screen it for injected instructions before the LLM processes it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect LSASS credential dumping, SAM database extraction, and NTDS.dit theft (e.g. via Mimikatz) using Sysmon Event ID 10 process-access logging, Windows Security logs, and SIEM correlation rules. Use when hunting for credential-theft activity on Windows/Active Directory hosts or triaging EDR alerts on LSASS access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects unauthorized runtime drift in containers by monitoring binary execution, filesystem changes, and configuration deviation from the original immutable image, using Falco and Microsoft Defender for Containers. Use when validating immutable-infrastructure controls, hunting for unexpected package installs or binaries written inside a running container, or determining whether a container diverged from the image it was built from. Keywords: drift, immutable infrastructure, new binary executed, package install, image mismatch, Falco. Do not use for detecting breakout from the container to the host - use detecting-container-escape-attempts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects container escape at runtime across tooling - namespace manipulation, capability abuse, kernel exploits, sensitive host mounts, and anomalous syscalls - and explains which signals matter regardless of whether Falco, Sysdig, auditd, or an EDR is doing the collection. Use when deciding what breakout behaviour to monitor, investigating a suspected Docker or Kubernetes breakout, or comparing escape coverage across runtime sensors. Keywords: container escape, breakout, namespaces, CAP_SYS_ADMIN, privileged, hostPath, kernel exploit, syscall. Do not use for Falco rule syntax itself - use detecting-container-escape-with-falco-rules; for a static configuration sweep use performing-container-escape-detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute authorized vishing (voice phishing) pretext calls to assess employee susceptibility to social engineering and evaluate security awareness controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures TLS 1.3 (RFC 8446) on servers, covering cipher suite and key-exchange group selection, and validates the resulting configuration with openssl s_client and testssl.sh. Use when deploying or hardening TLS 1.3 for secure communications, or when testing a server for common TLS misconfigurations and vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) advanced protection settings including attack surface reduction rules, controlled folder access, network protection, and exploit protection. Use when hardening Windows endpoints beyond default Defender settings, deploying enterprise-grade endpoint protection, or meeting compliance requirements for advanced malware defense. Activates for requests involving Windows Defender configuration, ASR rules, MDE tuning, or Microsoft endpoint security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wires Promptfoo and DeepTeam into CI/CD for automated, repeatable red-teaming of LLM apps against OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic, and MITRE ATLAS presets, failing the build when jailbreak or injection vulnerabilities regress. Use for continuous adversarial testing in CI/CD, a merge-blocking security gate, or comparing model/prompt versions for compliance reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures Hardware Security Modules for cryptographic key storage using the PKCS#11 standard interface, covering key generation, signing, encryption, and key management on physical HSMs and SoftHSM2 for development. Use when protecting cryptographic keys so they never leave a hardened device boundary, or when building and testing PKCS#11-based key management workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access for SASE-based zero trust network access, configuring GlobalProtect agents, ZTNA Connectors, security policy enforcement, and Strata Cloud Manager integration for unified management. Use when implementing enterprise-grade SASE with integrated ZTNA/SWG/CASB/FWaaS, replacing both VPN and branch firewalls with cloud-delivered security, or integrating ZTNA with an existing Palo Alto NGFW estate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Correlates security events in IBM QRadar SIEM using AQL (Ariel Query Language), custom rules, building blocks, and offense management to detect multi-stage attacks across network, endpoint, and application log sources. Use when SOC analysts need to investigate QRadar offenses, build correlation rules, or tune detection logic for reducing false positives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure a GitLab CI/CD pipeline that embeds SAST (Semgrep, SpotBugs, Gosec, Bandit, NodeJsScan), DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection via GitLab's managed security templates. Use when building a shift-left DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab, adding automated vulnerability scanning stages to .gitlab-ci.yml, or triaging scanner findings with GitLab Duo AI before deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build effective detection rules using Splunk Search Processing Language (SPL) correlation searches to identify security threats in SOC environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a phishing report button (Microsoft 365 built-in Report button or third-party like KnowBe4/Cofense) in email clients with a SOAR-driven automated triage workflow that classifies reported emails, extracts IOCs, takes remediation actions, and gives feedback to reporters. Use when deploying user-reported phishing intake or automating triage of the resulting reporting mailbox.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Respond to security incidents in AWS, Azure, and GCP via identity-based containment, cloud-native log analysis (CloudTrail, Azure Activity Logs, GCP Audit Logs), resource isolation, and forensic evidence acquisition adapted for ephemeral cloud infrastructure. Use when CSPM alerts or audit logs show compromised cloud credentials, unauthorized IAM changes, or a breach spanning cloud services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit AWS, Azure, and GCP environments against the CIS Foundations Benchmarks by running automated scans with tools like Prowler and ScoutSuite, interpreting failed controls, and tracking remediation for continuous compliance. Use when conducting a cloud security audit, validating CIS benchmark compliance (CIS v5 AWS, v4 Azure, v4 GCP), or setting up continuous cloud compliance monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit MCP servers for tool poisoning, tool shadowing, rug pulls, SSRF, and unauthenticated exposure using Invariant Labs' mcp-scan for static/runtime scanning plus manual SSRF/auth checks and description pinning. Use before adding a new MCP server to an agent stack, when reviewing an internal MCP server, detecting rug pulls, or investigating an agent's unexpected tool-driven behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Intel CHIPSEC to assess platform firmware configuration, SPI flash write protection, BIOS lock, SMM/SMRR, and Secure Boot variable state, dump SPI flash, and triage UEFI variables for firmware-level threats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-deployment security audit of Solidity smart contracts in a Foundry project. Combines static analysis (Slither, Aderyn), symbolic execution (Mythril), and property-based testing (forge fuzz + invariant tests with handlers) to catch reentrancy, access-control, oracle/price manipulation, and arithmetic bugs BEFORE deploying to an EVM chain. Also enforces key hygiene (no plaintext private keys, encrypted cast keystore) and a secure deploy workflow. Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or deploying Solidity/Foundry contracts, building a dApp, or working with forge/cast/anvil, MetaMask, or Web3/DeFi code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。