「surface」の検索結果

Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE consolidated comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate when designing or modifying CLI command surfaces, command help text, install/init/run flows, error wording, or first-run experience in the APM CLI -- even when the user does not say "UX" explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research an explicitly requested Marin question or coordinate a multi-session experiment; find prior work, assess evidence, and record results in the task's existing durable surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design experiments and studies BEFORE data is collected — choosing a design, randomizing, blocking, and laying out treatment combinations so the results will actually be interpretable. Use whenever someone is planning a study, asks how to assign subjects/samples to groups, mentions randomization, blocking, stratification, controls, factorial or fractional-factorial designs, design of experiments (DOE), screening many factors, response-surface optimization, crossover or repeated-measures or split-plot designs, cluster/group randomization, Latin squares, plate layouts, batch/run-order effects, replication vs. pseudoreplication, or sequential/adaptive/group-sequential designs. Trigger this even for informal phrasings like "how should I set up this experiment", "how do I avoid confounding", "what's the best way to test these 6 factors", or "assign these mice to conditions". For computing the sample size or power once the design is chosen, use statistical-power; for analyzing data already collected, use statistical-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full SEO audit combining Google Search Console, URL Inspection API, PageSpeed Insights, a technical crawl, keyword research, and metadata, schema, search intent and Core Web Vitals checks. Surfaces quick wins, diagnoses traffic drops and content gaps, and produces an actionable 30-day plan. Use whenever the user asks about SEO, search rankings, organic traffic, Google Search Console, keyword performance, search visibility, technical SEO, URL indexing, or LCP, INP, CLS or Lighthouse scores. Also trigger on: "why is my traffic down", "what keywords am I ranking for", "improve my rankings", "check my search console", "SEO audit", "analyze my SEO", "technical SEO", "meta tags", "indexing issues", "crawl errors", "content strategy", "keyword cannibalization", "search intent", "schema markup", "structured data", "URL inspection", "page speed", "performance score", "core web vitals", "lighthouse", or any organic search question. If in doubt, trigger.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score and diagnose Google Ads landing pages. Use when asked to audit a landing page, check landing page quality, diagnose high-CTR but low-conversion-rate ad groups, improve Quality Score's Landing Page Experience component, or compare an ad group's messaging against its landing page. Trigger on "landing page audit", "landing page score", "landing page quality", "why is my conversion rate low", "LPX", "landing page experience", "ad to page match", or when `/google-ads-audit` surfaces a high-CTR / low-CVR ad group.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO drift monitoring — snapshot a site's SEO state and detect regressions over time. Captures a baseline (rankings/positions, indexed page count, titles & meta descriptions, canonical/robots directives, schema presence, key on-page elements) and on later runs diffs against it to surface what changed: ranking drops, pages that fell out of the index, titles/metas that were accidentally overwritten (a CMS/redeploy classic), canonicals or noindex flipped, schema that disappeared. Use this skill when the user wants to monitor SEO over time, catch regressions after a site change / migration / redeploy, set a baseline, diff against a previous state, or asks "what changed on my site's SEO" or "did my redesign break SEO". Trigger on: "SEO drift", "SEO monitoring", "track SEO over time", "did my site change break SEO", "after migration SEO", "SEO regression", "baseline my SEO", "compare SEO to last month", "my titles changed", "pages fell out of the index". For a one-time full audit use /seo-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex-only team orchestration: run a named team of cooperating Codex workers with durable, script-managed state. MUST USE when the user asks Codex to create, run, coordinate, inspect, archive, or delete a team of agents/threads/sessions, or to work on something as a team in parallel. FIRST inspects the active tool surface (checking tool_search for deferred tools) and tells the user the route: native MultiAgentV2 agents (flat spawn_agent with task_name) when available, Codex App threads as the fallback, or a plain-subagent split when neither set exists. The main session is always the leader; members are defined by a concrete part, ownership area, or perspective - never a vague job role; a bundled cross-platform script writes the .omo/teams state plus an auto-generated member field manual. Use a team when the work is not perfectly isolated but parallelizing helps; use plain subagents when scope is perfectly isolated or the goal is ambiguous. Triggers: team mode, teammode, make a team, run as a team, team of agents, coordinate threads, parallel Codex threads, archive the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs rigorous visual QA across web, terminal, and paginated surfaces: an Apple HIG-based checklist, paired light/dark captures at phone and desktop widths, screenshot evidence, and a per-item PASS/FAIL verdict. Use for any UI build or change, or when asked whether a page, component, or TUI looks right or follows the platform's design guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a website's observable HTTP traffic into a best-effort OpenAPI 3.1 spec by analyzing a `browser-trace` capture. Use when the user wants to discover/extract API endpoints from a browser session, build an OpenAPI doc from network traffic, or document a third-party site's XHR/fetch surface for client integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routing and boundary guidance for authorized general web application security testing. Use as a web testing router when the attack surface should be dispatched to more specific web vulnerability skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the agent creates, writes, moves, or renames a file in a team/delegate (shared) workspace, OR when the user asks to organize, clean up, restructure, audit, or find files in any workspace or the Vault, OR when starting a multi-file task or named project. Enforces a purpose-based folder convention (flat mode: notes/, data/, outputs/, scripts/, archive/; project mode: projects/<slug>/{docs,assets,source,reports,research}/), per-agent namespacing under shared/<agent_key>/, and pre-write discovery via memory_search, vault_search, knowledge_graph_search to surface related files and avoid duplicates. Trigger before any write_file or exec at workspace root, when starting a project, generating reports/assets/exports, delegating, or when the user says "messy", "where did I save", "tổ chức lại", "dọn workspace", "tạo report", "find related", "search vault". Do NOT trigger for read-only ops, edits inside an existing project tree (cloned repo), or short-lived files deleted in the same turn.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface Claude's assumptions about a phase approach before planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a forward-looking idea with trigger conditions — surfaces automatically at the right milestone

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified APM and monitoring surface. Polls Datadog, New Relic, and OpenTelemetry backends for active alerts, error traces, and entity health. Use --watch for live polling every 60 seconds. Use --setup to configure monitoring credentials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent guide for operating Sequenzy. Use when Codex needs to authenticate, inspect identity, manage subscribers, create or edit campaigns/sequences/templates, generate draft email content, send a transactional email, read delivery stats, or decide whether a requested Sequenzy workflow is currently supported. Prefer the CLI when it is implemented, and fall back to the dashboard or direct API use when the current CLI surface is only partial.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Boot the session, load context from the vault, and surface what matters

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when migrating applications, examples, integrations, documentation, manifests, or repository code from NeMo Flow to NeMo Relay across Python, Rust, Node.js, Go, C FFI, CLI, configuration, and observability surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when measuring Jetson Video Codec SDK or PyNvVideoCodec encode/decode throughput, comparing presets or surfaces, testing codec-worker capacity with authenticated samples and user media, or producing a clearly labeled documentation-derived planning estimate when representative media is absent. Also use for a video request limited to PSNR or SSIM, to apply the terminal scope response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when turning a Jetson encoder use case into one surface-neutral recipe with native Video Codec SDK and PyNvVideoCodec projections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on DOCA Telemetry Exporter programming on a host where DOCA is installed — defining a doca_telemetry_exporter_schema and event types, creating sources, picking a publish surface (typed events / opaque events / the metrics counter-gauge-histogram API / OTLP logs / NetFlow), walking the schema-then-source lifecycle, or debugging DOCA_ERROR_* failures from the exporter API. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "DOCA Telemetry Exporter" or "doca_telemetry_exporter_*" — typical implicit phrasings include "publishing counters from my DOCA app", "BAD_STATE when I report an event", "consumer/DTS sees nothing but my report succeeded", "how do I export NetFlow/IPFIX records", or "should I link the exporter or the telemetry service". Refuse and route elsewhere for the receiving DOCA Telemetry Service (DTS), plain stdout logging via doca_log, or real-time event subscription back into the app via doca-comch — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to read DOCA hardware-counter events from a `doca_dev` through the per-domain Telemetry reader libraries: `doca_telemetry_pcc`, `_dpa`, `_diag`, `_adp_retx`, `_phy`, and `_pci`. It covers capability checks, context creation, startup, and per-domain reads or samples. Trigger for implicit requests such as "read PCC counters from my BlueField app", "sample DPA counter exports", or "expose PHY, PCI, or DIAG counters from this doca_dev". This is the counter-reader surface, not a NetFlow, IPFIX, or local-socket collector. Route publishing and export to `doca-telemetry-exporter`; route deployed DOCA Telemetry Service (DTS), collectors, and plain stdout logging elsewhere.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PLAINTEXT-ONLY: the shipped `doca_flow_grpc` server uses `grpc::InsecureServerCredentials()` with NO TLS / mTLS / token-auth knob on the binary — transport security must come from external infrastructure (e.g. an mTLS proxy / sidecar) on a trusted segment. Use this skill when bringing up, configuring, hardening, or debugging `doca_flow_grpc` — the DOCA-shipped gRPC remote-control surface in front of `doca-flow` that lets non-C++ clients (Python, Go, Rust, Java) program Flow pipes and entries over RPC instead of linking `libdoca_flow.so` directly. Trigger even when the user doesn't say 'doca-flow-grpc-server' or 'gRPC' — e.g. 'program Flow rules from Python on another host', 'remotely configure pipes on the BlueField', 'client times out connecting to the Flow server', 'where is the .proto for Flow', 'UNAUTHENTICATED / FAILED_PRECONDITION on a Flow RPC'. Route elsewhere for the underlying doca-flow API, generic gRPC tooling (protoc, language bindings), or DOCA install / BFB bring-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。