「verified」の検索結果

Use when replacing a greenfield attempt with a clean pad of verified requirements. Not for rebuilding from primitives: use from-first-principle. Requires a committed, VCS-recoverable attempt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply one exact-target reversible Proto UI Issue, pull-request, review-thread, or Actions collaboration update and return a verified receipt. Use for governed title/body or label repair, update-branch, ready-for-review, review requests, fixed-thread resolution, bounded status comments, and exact-run CI recheck. Do not submit a review disposition, merge, close, publish, release, or change privileged repository settings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repair one independently verified Proto UI maintenance finding when governing authority or an explicit product decision fixes the expected result. Use for the bounded remediation and its evidence packet before independent review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reliability gate for answers. Forces evidence-based reasoning, explicit uncertainty, and “insufficient information” instead of guesses. Use when user says “be 100% sure”, “no hallucinations”, “only if verified”, “grounded answer”, or when stakes are high.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fires after fixing any non-trivial bug or regression. Asks: could the graph have caught this as a guarantee? Pairs with reflection-in-and-on-action — picks up after "earliest catchable signal" and asks the next question: was that signal expressible in graph? Triggers: (1) after any non-trivial bug fix is verified working, (2) after a regression report (something used to work, broke), (3) during step 6 (knowledge extraction) of the workflow, (4) when reflection-on-action surfaces a "would have been catchable" signal. Outcome is a triage decision (graph-reachable? rule expressible? rule sound?) and either a draft Linear issue + guarantee proposal, or a recorded "graph capability gap" note. Never auto-creates guarantees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "minimize the repro path", "/minimize", "shrink the crash steps", "精简复现路径", "找最小复现", "把 12 步压成 3 步", or wants to compress a recorded crash repro_path into the shortest sequence that still reproduces the same crash signature. Drives live Android replay via mobile-mcp + ui-mcp + log-mcp, validates each candidate subset with analyzer-mcp's signature, and updates the session's crash record with the verified minimal path; iOS sessions use the static fallback because ui-mcp replay is Android-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The phone is your last API. Give your agent a voice to call any US business and take action in the real world. PlaceCall handles reservations, inquiries, and quotes - navigating IVRs, holds, and transfers. You get a verified outcome + full transcript. First 250 calls free. Pay only for outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reliability gate for answers. Forces evidence-based reasoning, explicit uncertainty, and “insufficient information” instead of guesses. Use when user says “be 100% sure”, “no hallucinations”, “only if verified”, “grounded answer”, or when stakes are high.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only for user-provided academic text, explicit scholarly claims, existing citations, or known bibliographies needing citations added, verified, replaced, extracted, or formatted. Supports claim-to-source matching, citation-support checks, replacements, and common academic citation formats. Do not use for general fact-checking, legal/journalistic citation work, open-ended 'find literature about X', topic-level exhaustive discovery, systematic-review corpus construction, PRISMA searches, or creating new research claims. Chinese: 为已有段落补参考文献、核验已有引用、替换错误引用、提取需引文论断、GB/T 7714 格式化.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or evolve an implementation-agnostic website design system from existing-site evidence, verified brand inputs, and an optional Visual Reference Brief. Use to establish visual and restrained-motion baselines, extract an existing site's rendered system for style-preserving extensions, validate one selected baseline with a compact Design Board, or update shared rules before page/module design. Do not conduct cross-industry reference research, map Elementor settings, create page layouts, design modules, or implement production code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or audit a complete, concise, UI-ready website page content framework from verified business facts before visual design. Use to define page goals, customer decision flow, section order, realistic draft copy, content and evidence needs, CTAs, or page-family rules; do not use for visual design, HTML, SEO implementation, or platform code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for every coding task. Enforce strict TDD workflow: activate Serena, investigate first, clarify+confirm requirements, write per-task REQUIREMENTS.md in .requirements/<datetime>_<feature_name>/, verify APIs via web search, then implement in tiny test-verified steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide Maestro's Jira issue/task journeys with exact site/project/issue identity, source-state mapping, supported task controls, and verified repository PR links.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes structured recovery from a ransomware incident following NIST and CISA frameworks, including environment isolation, forensic evidence preservation, clean infrastructure rebuild, prioritized system restoration from verified backups, credential reset, and validation against re-infection. Covers Active Directory recovery, database restoration, and application stack rebuild in dependency order. Activates for requests involving ransomware recovery, post-encryption restoration, or disaster recovery from ransomware.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GPU-optimized OCR using Surya. Use when extracting text from images/screenshots, recovering image-only content in PDFs or slides, or inspecting multilingual document layouts. Preserve source locations and report recognition gaps separately from verified text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or revise audience-ready HTML paper presentations for lab meetings and journal clubs. Use when Codex needs source-grounded figures and tables, a fluent live-talk narrative, verified quotations, varied explanatory diagrams, presenter-paced reveals, or browser QA for evidence fidelity, interaction, responsive layout, and print.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect security assessment. Covers the full attack surface: redirect_uri validation bypass (path traversal, open redirect chains, subdomain confusion, URL parsing tricks, parameter pollution, response mode switching), missing/broken state parameter CSRF, PKCE downgrade and absent-challenge attacks, implicit grant token leakage (Referer, browser history, XSS fragment theft), authorization code injection, scope escalation, client confusion attacks, mutable-claims account takeover (iss+sub confusion, email-keyed identity merging), pre-account takeover via unverified registration, OpenID Connect dynamic client registration SSRF (logo_uri, jwks_uri, sector_identifier_uri, request_uri), nonce replay, ID token validation failures, Device Code phishing flow, mobile custom URI scheme hijacking, refresh token persistence, token introspection enumeration, consent screen clickjacking, host header injection, and cross-IdP mix-up attacks. Uses KOAuth, jwt_tool, nuclei oauth templates, and manual http(action="request", ...) payloads. Every technique includes actual request payloads and verification logic. Chains from /pentester or /api-security when OAuth endpoints are discovered. Chains into /web-exploit for open redirect, XSS, and SSRF chaining. Chains into /post-exploit when full account takeover is achieved. Chains into /credential-audit when access tokens or refresh tokens are recovered.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when testing JWT-based authentication for algorithm confusion, alg:none bypass, weak HMAC secrets, missing expiration, kid parameter injection, and token storage in localStorage. Trigger on: Authorization: Bearer tokens, JWTs in cookies, any base64url encoded header.payload.signature pattern, OAuth2 access tokens, API authentication tokens, SSO tokens, JWKS endpoints. Detects RS256→HS256 confusion, public key as HMAC secret, unverified kid values used in file reads or SQL queries, and JWT cracking with short secrets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Mass Assignment vulnerabilities in APIs. Use this skill when testing REST APIs or application forms that directly map user-supplied JSON or POST input to internal database objects. An attacker can inject undocumented variables (e.g., `is_admin`, `verified`) to illegally modify restricted properties.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and repair Pharos documentation against the codebase. Use for documentation update passes, verified-doc drift, source-path/doc-sync failures, methodology/doc routing updates, or requests to verify docs without trusting existing prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify CoinGecko identity, discover missing stablecoin chain coverage, or populate independently verified deployments only when requested. Use for `geckoId` audits and `contracts[]` work in the Pharos stablecoin registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close out a completed EPIC / sprint end-to-end: author a fact-verified meta-post announcing what shipped, archive the EPIC's handovers, snapshot orchestrator memory, gate the integration→main merge on CI-green + explicit human go, drive the version bump (merge-commit conventions that auto-sync classifies), and verify the release reached the registry/PyPI. Use when the user says "close out EPIC <n>", "wrap up the sprint", "ship the meta shift", "/epic-close", or asks to finalize an integration branch that is ready to merge to main. Generalizes the EPIC 1002 (Yggdrasil II) close-out. This skill orchestrates — it authors founder docs directly (superadmin) and delegates code/regen to workers; it NEVER merges to main without the human gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Batch wrapper for /gaia-ingest. Ingests a bounded set of already-verified evidence rows through CLI-only writes, uses --no-build on every row, appraises Trust Magnitude for every affected named skill, then runs exactly one build and validation pass. Use for an L4-approved intake after /ev-pipeline; benchmark-result rows also require a Phase 2B report and explicit human gate approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate resumption of any multi-day LLM batch-scoring campaign that calls an unpinned model alias (deepseek-chat, gpt-*-latest, gemini-*-preview, any provider alias without a pinned version). Use when: (1) resuming a paused or credit-exhausted scoring run days after its last chunk, (2) topping up credits to finish a campaign, (3) extending a cached scoring pipeline with new items. Prevents silently splicing two model versions or serving revisions into one measure. Verified 2026-07-16: for $0.30 caught a serving-revision drift WITHIN DeepSeek v4-flash (same alias, same family, litigation scores systematically shifted across a 2-day gap) before an $83 resume spend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。