4,705 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run a bounded red-green-refactor feedback loop only when the user explicitly requests TDD, accepts reproduction-first proof for a bug, or an accepted high-risk behavior specifically requires red/green evidence; do not trigger for every logic, bug, behavior, or implementation change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and synthesize a source-grounded multi-paper literature review. Use for systematic literature reviews, survey matrices, inclusion/exclusion criteria, research gaps, or "review the literature on X" requests; do not use for reviewing one paper, ordinary web summaries, citation formatting only, or medical/legal conclusions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze source data, tables, CSV/XLSX extracts, metrics, or experiment results with explicit data-authenticity checks. Use for profiling, cleaning assumptions, statistical summaries, segmentation, trend analysis, or "analyze this data"; do not use for spreadsheet file surgery, chart design only, database migrations, or claims without data provenance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optional focused post-implementation review routing. Use only when the user requests review or the changed surface has a clear specialist evidence need that direct diff inspection and the smallest relevant check cannot cover. Never creates an automatic review swarm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route an explicitly requested independent/delegated browser QA assignment or durable E2E evidence need; do not trigger for direct Playwright/DOM/console/network inspection, ordinary UI implementation, backend-only work, or production-mutating flows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coverage review and verification sufficiency routing. Use when test coverage, uncovered paths, coverage reports, or verification adequacy need a read-only QA review; do not use for writing tests or running browser/E2E artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain a complex concept through a short allegory, story, analogy, metaphor, or intuitive teaching example, then map it back to formal concepts and limits; do not use as the primary skill for implementation, specs, source-cited API guidance, or fiction-only writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a backend service or an end-to-end frontend/backend integration when service/API/data boundaries are the primary deliverable; do not trigger for pure UI, contract design only, security review, test workflow, or every feature touching both folders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs read-only GitHub issue or PR triage with evidence links. Use when analyzing public or repository GitHub issues/PRs without mutating labels, comments, branches, reviews, merges, or issue state.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prefer a fresh matching specialist for a clear bounded non-trivial package when current capabilities and permissions permit it; use direct ROSE work only for accepted direct-work exceptions or a concrete block.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate, edit, inspect, or verify editable PowerPoint/PPTX decks when a .pptx file is the deliverable; use for template-preserving edits and from-scratch slide production, but not for HTML/SVG mockups, PDF-only reports, or presentation advice that needs no PPTX artifact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements security headers and Content Security Policy with safe rollout strategy (report-only → enforce), testing, and compatibility checks. Use for "security headers", "CSP", "HTTP headers", or "XSS protection".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right library for a given frontend task from a curated, opinionated list — numbers, OTP inputs, charts, command menus, virtualization, drag and drop, toasts, state, styling, and more. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes CI pipelines for monorepos by detecting affected packages/apps and running only necessary builds and tests. Includes Turborepo/Nx strategies, caching, and parallel execution. Use for "monorepo CI", "affected detection", "incremental builds", or "workspace optimization".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build multiple genuinely different versions of a UI piece you describe, rendered behind a visual picker so you can flip through them live and promote the one that feels right. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animations, use improve-animations or review-animations instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the animations", "audit the motion", "make this app feel better", or wants a roadmap of animation fixes rather than a review of a single diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elite mobile app image-generation skill for creating premium, app-native screen concepts and flows. Designed for iOS, Android, and cross-platform mobile products. Prioritizes clean hierarchy, comfortably readable text, strong multi-screen consistency, controlled color palettes, non-generic creative direction, textured surfaces, image-led composition, tasteful custom iconography, and clean phone mockup framing. By default, screens should be shown inside a subtle premium iPhone or similar phone mockup with a visible frame, while the main focus stays on the app content itself. This skill generates images only. It does not write code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The original v1 taste-skill, preserved for projects depending on its exact behavior. The current default is `design-taste-frontend` (v2 experimental), which is a substantial rewrite. Use this v1 install name only if you need exact backward compatibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunt shadow / zombie / undocumented API surface (OWASP API9 Improper Inventory Management) — enumerate the full API version history (v1/v2/beta/legacy paths, header- and subdomain-based versioning), pull and diff every reachable OpenAPI/Swagger spec (including ones only findable via the Wayback Machine), and behaviorally diff old vs. current versions for auth/rate-limit/validation regressions rather than just response-shape differences. Distinct from hunt-api-misconfig, which owns exploitation once you have a spec or endpoint (mass assignment, JWT, OData, Swagger-chain attacks); distinct from hunt-subdomain, which owns host-level discovery. This skill owns the version-inventory and behavioral-diff workflow itself. Use when the target has versioned API paths, multiple specs, a changelog referencing deprecated endpoints, or a mobile app whose hardcoded backend calls look older than the current web app's.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunt Session Management vulnerabilities — session fixation (no regeneration on login), insufficient invalidation on logout / password-change / email-change, predictable or low-entropy session IDs, JWT-as-session with no exp/revocation, refresh-token rotation/reuse-detection gaps, OAuth/SSO session linkage, device-bound-session (DBSC) downgrade, and cookie attribute issues (Secure/HttpOnly/SameSite/__Host-). Validate with TWO real sessions (attacker A + victim B), body-diff every 200, and OOB confirmation for theft chains. Medium to Critical (fixation→admin hijack, no-invalidation→persistent ATO).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunting skill for sqli vulnerabilities. Built from 12 public bug bounty reports including modern NoSQL injection (Rocket.Chat CVE-2021-22911 MongoDB $regex, Mongoose ORM CVE-2024-53900 $where bypass), modern ORM raw-fragment SQLi (Django CVE-2024-42005, Sequelize GHSA-wrh9-cjv3-2hpw), second-order SOQL injection (HackerOne Salesforce), time-based blind SQLi in GraphQL resolvers, and SQLi on OIDC-proxy backends. Use when hunting SQLi on any target. Dedicated NoSQL operator injection (MongoDB/CouchDB $where/$regex/$ne) is owned by hunt-nosqli — NoSQL appears here only as adjacent ORM/WAF context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunt JWT cryptographic failures — alg:none signature-stripping and RS256→HS256 key-confusion that let an attacker forge a token for any identity (e.g. an admin) without knowing a secret. Use when the app authenticates with a JSON Web Token (an `eyJ...` Bearer token in the Authorization header, a cookie, or a login response). This skill OWNS JWT signature/crypto forgery (alg:none, key confusion, kid/jku header injection); hunt-ato covers JWT as one ATO path, hunt-auth-bypass covers SSO/SAML token trust, hunt-api-misconfig covers non-crypto JWT handling. Critical when a forged token grants access to another user's data or an admin-only endpoint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。