5,518 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audits and realigns UI to match design system standards, spacing, tokens, and patterns. Use when the user mentions consistency, design drift, mismatched styles, tokens, or wants to bring a feature back in line with the system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate a PRD against standards. Use when the user says "validate this PRD" or "run PRD validation"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill is for interface design — dashboards, admin panels, apps, tools, and interactive products. NOT for marketing design (landing pages, marketing sites, campaigns).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test, fold or refute hypotheses beside the knowledge record, and reconcile records across branches. Use when open or check say hypotheses wait or an id is CONTESTED, when a write was refused into a hypothesis, before merging a branch whose record changed, and when a pull request's dry run or remeasure is red. Covers consolidate --dry-run, the fold, --refute, --from, same and distinct at the fold, and remeasure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map existing materials into a first knowledge record, or investigate a subject's history in depth. Use whenever the user asks to map, survey, go through, reconstruct or investigate what already exists - folders of documents, decision records, meeting notes, emails, exports, code - or wants a starting record built from existing materials, even when the word 'record' is never said: consult this before listing or reading the files yourself, because a map has an agreed scope, a protocol and a report. Also, once, at a suitable moment, to offer the starting choices where a workspace has no record and the work is clearly ongoing - never on a greeting. Learning while working needs no map. Requests come in any language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Opinionated constraints for building better web interfaces with coding agents. Use this skill whenever the user asks you to build, review, or fix a UI — landing pages, dashboards, components, or any frontend code — and whenever you write Tailwind CSS, motion/react animations, accessible component primitives (Base UI, React Aria, Radix), or review agent-generated interface code for quality, accessibility, and performance. Also trigger for "make the UI better", "review my interface", "clean up this component", or any frontend work in React, Next.js, or plain HTML/CSS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and improves task-specific decision artifacts from application requirements and labeled records. Use for data assembly, primitive and base-model selection, fitting, export/reload, inference policy, or bounded data/model/program improvement. Includes rules and no-training outcomes; does not require a rung ladder or training a general Jev.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates stakeholder communications including investor updates, board reports, annual impact reports, and partner communications aligned with B Corp PSG standards. Use when user asks about investor relations, board communications, stakeholder reporting, impact reports, annual reports, or partner/supplier communications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages government affairs, public policy communications, and collective action aligned with B Corp GACA standards. Creates policy position papers, advocacy communications, regulatory response documents, and transparent lobbying reports. Use when user asks about government relations, public policy, advocacy, lobbying, regulatory affairs, collective action, or political engagement transparency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages brand identity, visual design system, and creative quality for MMIND.ai. Generates complete image prompts for Nano Banana Pro (Gemini), enforces the strict 5-color palette, flat-vector SaaS style, and typography standards. Use when user needs graphic prompts, brand consistency checks, visual style guidance, design briefs, or creative QA for any marketing asset.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates complete newsletter editions for the Flow Factor Newsletter on Beehiiv. Generates full newsletter text (1,200-1,500 words), SEO metadata, subject lines, header illustration prompts, and NotebookLM audio briefing prompts. Use when user asks to write a newsletter, create email content, plan newsletter editions, or produce Beehiiv-ready content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publishes HTML or Markdown as display.dev URLs with public, company, or private access. Supports signup, claiming, sharing, browsing, bounded reads, exact edits, and comment iteration. Use when the user asks to "publish this", "share this", "share with the org", "post this online", "make a private link", "share with [email]", "publish a report", "list my artifacts", "find an artifact", "publish a large file", "publish this generated HTML file", "read this artifact", "search inside this artifact", "change this passage", "make a copy of this artifact", "duplicate version", "create a display.dev account", "claim this publish", "add a company email domain", "transfer an email domain", "change the email domains add-on", "show my referral link", "show referral rewards", "watch comments on this artifact", "respond to comments", or "resolve this comment thread". Use whenever a request contains a display.dev artifact URL (`*.dsp.so/*`). Anonymous publishing returns a 30-day preview and browser claim URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need CRAP score and coverage risk analysis to find high-risk code before refactoring or release. Keywords: CRAP score, risk hotspots, cyclomatic complexity, test coverage gaps, coverage threshold.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to verify a story or ticket implementation against its spec - per-AC verdicts, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, then adversarial maintainer verification. Requires the qa/review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, QA this branch, verify story.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to inspect NuGet package APIs, list public types, or decompile method/property signatures. Keywords: inspect package API, list types, decompile type, method signatures, NuGet interface.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when selecting serialisation formats and contracts for APIs, messaging, caching, or persistence. Keywords: serialisation, System.Text.Json, source generator, protobuf, messagepack, wire compatibility, AOT.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing types and collections for hot paths and low-allocation .NET code. Keywords: readonly struct, sealed class, ValueTask, Span, FrozenDictionary, FrozenSet, allocation optimisation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or changing public C#/.NET APIs with compatibility and versioning constraints. Keywords: breaking change, API design, backward compatibility, binary compatibility, deprecation strategy, versioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when verifying a story or ticket implementation against its spec and acceptance criteria - per-AC verdicts with file:line evidence and proving tests, code reuse and design conformance, dead code, stale docs, comment discipline. Finds the spec from an explicit path, the ticket key in the branch name, or plan files - and asks rather than guessing. For defect-hunting code review use dotnet-techne-code-review instead. Keywords: story QA, acceptance criteria, spec conformance, AC coverage, definition of done, dead code check, reuse check, comment check, verify story, QA this branch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a multi-agent .NET code review - five parallel reviewers (correctness, performance, security/observability, data/messaging/integration, generalist) plus an adversarial maintainer that refutes weak findings. Requires the review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: dotnet review pipeline, multi-agent review, parallel reviewers, maintainer pushback, review this branch, cynical review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing a .NET pull request for breaking changes that may affect other microservice repositories. Detects cross-repo API, DTO, endpoint, EF entity, and NuGet-package breaks, and checks whether a compatible downstream PR already exists. Keywords: cross-repo impact, breaking change, microservice compatibility, downstream break, compatible PR, blast radius review, api compatibility, contract break, dto shape change, endpoint break.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need blast-radius analysis, dependency graphs, cross-repo impact, breaking-change diff, or architectural overview of .NET workspaces. Keywords: blast radius, dependency graph, impact analysis, cross-repo, call graph, endpoint map, EF Core lineage, breaking change, daemon, reindex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing .NET concurrency patterns for async I/O, queues, pipelines, or thread safety. Keywords: async/await, channels, dataflow, Rx, lock contention, producer consumer, parallel processing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。