「audit」の検索結果

Configure and manage Field Service Lightning inventory: ProductItem (stock at locations), ProductTransfer (stock movement), ProductConsumed (parts used on work orders), ProductRequest/ProductRequestLineItem (replenishment ordering), ProductItemTransaction (audit trail). NOT for work orders, work types, or service appointments — use admin/fsl-work-order-management. NOT for ERP parts and inventory sync — use architect/fsl-integration-patterns. NOT for Omnichannel Inventory (OCI) — use architect/order-management-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Troubleshooting Connected App OAuth flows — IP relaxation vs IP restriction, refresh token policy traps (default kills the connection on first refresh), session-revocation semantics, the OAuth error-code catalog (`invalid_grant`, `invalid_client_id`, `unsupported_grant_type`), per-user vs admin-pre-approved flows, and the user-policy check (Connected App must be assigned to the user via profile / permset). Covers the Login History debug trail. NOT for designing the OAuth flow itself — use integration/oauth-flows-and-connected-apps. NOT for a SAML / SSO login failure — use security/sso-saml-troubleshooting. Trigger keywords: 'invalid_grant', 'OAUTH_APP_BLOCKED', 'redirect_uri_mismatch', 'LoginHistory Status', 'LoginSubType', 'OauthRefreshToken', 'ForwardedForIp', 'SetupAuditTrail connected app', 'refreshTokenPolicy zero', 'isSecretRequiredForRefreshToken', 'works once then fails', 'diagnosis record'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router for the 49 SfSkills `security` skill packages. Platform security and compliance: org hardening, encryption, session policy, MFA, monitoring, incident response, and TROUBLESHOOTING a specific record-access denial. Designing the sharing model itself (OWD, role hierarchy, sharing rules) is salesforce-admin. Use when the request mentions security, org hardening, Shield, platform encryption, field audit trail, MFA, SSO, SAML, session policy, guest user, event monitoring, GDPR, XSS, injection, why can this one user see this record, Apex managed sharing, sharing recalculation. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or auditing the conversational copy layer of a Salesforce bot or Agentforce agent: utterance authoring strategy, fallback message copy, escalation-criteria phrasing, and persona-consistent dialog scripting across channels. NOT for designing the bot dialog structure, intent model, or handoff architecture — use architect/einstein-bot-architecture. NOT for encoding agent tone in Agentforce system instructions — use agentforce/agentforce-persona-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, or audit a Change Advisory Board (CAB) process for Salesforce deployments: change classification (standard, normal, emergency), required approvals, deployment gate sequencing, and integration with external ITSM tooling. NOT for scoring how risky one release is - use admin/deployment-risk-assessment. NOT for executing or troubleshooting the deployment itself - use admin/change-management-and-deployment. Also covers: the CAB charter (membership, quorum, decision rights), the CAB decision record artefact and its linter, the change classification matrix, the deployOptions a CAB decision pins (checkOnly, testLevel, rollbackOnError, ignoreWarnings, runTests), the 10-day quick-deploy validity window, the deploy-window vs freeze-register check, and the emergency (ECAB) path with its mandatory retrospective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects usage of private Apple APIs, undocumented frameworks, and runtime introspection patterns that bypass the public SDK, enforcing Guideline 2.5.1. Private API usage causes automated binary rejection at upload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects missing or insufficiently descriptive NS*UsageDescription keys in Info.plist that cause guaranteed App Store rejection under Guideline 5.1.1(ii).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects improper use of SKStoreReviewController.requestReview() that violates Guideline 5.6.1 — including prompts triggered by button taps, excessive frequency, or satisfaction gating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects over-broad permission requests where a narrower permission or privacy-preserving alternative API is sufficient, violating Guideline 5.1.1(iii) data minimization requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects apps that abuse iOS background execution modes — particularly silent audio used to keep the app alive, location background mode used for non-navigation purposes, and background task implementations that do excessive work — enforcing Guideline 2.5.4.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects force unwraps, force casts, force try, and other crash-prone Swift patterns that can cause unrecoverable crashes during App Store review, violating Guideline 2.1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects analytics or tracking SDKs present without the required App Tracking Transparency prompt, enforcing Guideline 5.1.2(i) which requires user consent before any cross-app or cross-site tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects data collection patterns that exceed what is necessary for the app's stated functionality, enforcing Guideline 5.1.1(iii) data minimization requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects hardcoded iPhone-sized widths, missing iPad orientation keys, and absent size-class adaptation that cause layout failures on iPad reviewers' devices under guidelines 2.1 and 2.4.1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects push notification implementations that violate Guideline 4.5.4 — including requesting push permission at launch, using push for unsolicited marketing, and broken notification handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects permission requests triggered at app launch or before meaningful user interaction, which violates Guideline 5.1.1(ii) requiring permissions to be requested only at the moment of need with contextual explanation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform thorough code reviews with actionable, prioritized feedback. Use when a user asks to review code, check code quality, find bugs, review a pull request, audit code for issues, or get feedback on implementation. Covers correctness, security, performance, readability, and best practices across languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map a codebase into feature-grouped flowcharts, identify duplicated concerns across features, and propose a unified architecture. Use when asked to "find the ideal path," unify duplicated systems, or audit architecture before a refactor. Emits a proposed unified flowchart plus per-system /make-plan prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI CRO Expert — landing page audit, A/B test plan, funnel analysis, heatmap interpretation, form optimization สำหรับเว็บไซต์และ e-commerce ไทย

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SEO specialist AI — keyword research, content outline, on-page audit, meta tags สำหรับเว็บไทย

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Blockchain/Web3 Developer — smart contract (Solidity/Rust), ERC-20/721/1155, DeFi protocol, security audit เบื้องต้น, deploy testnet/mainnet

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fully autonomous bug hunting pipeline — discover bugs in a scoped area using parallel subagents, independently triage each finding, fix confirmed issues with subagents, then audit all fixes against repo constraints and target platforms. Runs end-to-end without user interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run work as an explicit event-driven state machine executed by subagents. The orchestrator is the runtime from the canonical loop — `state, effects = init(machine); execute(effects); while state is active: event = nextEvent(); state, effects = transition(machine, state, event); execute(effects); return state.output`. All routing judgment is authored ONCE, at plan time, into a machine file (states, event alphabet, transition table, budgets, final states); at runtime the orchestrator does pure table lookups and dispatches effects — it never decides, never authors, never ingests artifacts. Subagent/sync protocol is the timeboxed-iterating one: role prompts scaffolded once to disk and dispatched BY PATH, an initialiser preamble every subagent reads first, a self-populating cheatsheet, per-unit files, tiny structured returns, independent measurement gate. Use when the user says "workmachine", "run this as a state machine", "state-machine this", or when a goal has a small number of clearly named phases with explicit outcomes (built / passed / failed / blocked) and you want the routing to be auditable rather than judged on the fly. For clock-driven loops use timeboxed-iterating; for wide graphs with judged edge criteria use workgraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。