Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project design standards. Run this before handing a design document to programmers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
49 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project design standards. Run this before handing a design document to programmers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill enables Claude to automatically check for HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) compliance issues in codebases, infrastructure configurations, and documentation. It leverages the hipaa-compliance-checker plugin to identify potential violations related to data privacy, security, and access controls. Use this skill when the user explicitly requests to "check HIPAA compliance", "scan for HIPAA violations", "assess HIPAA readiness", or similar phrases related to HIPAA audits and security best practices. It is useful for projects handling protected health information (PHI) and requiring adherence to HIPAA regulations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to review code. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses on correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Contribute to OpenClaw ecosystem projects (OpenClaw, NemoClaw, NanoClaw) through a structured 9-step workflow: target verification, codebase exploration, parallel audit, finding cross-reference, and pull request creation. Emphasizes false positive prevention and project convention adherence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-mortem analysis of a PhysicsIntern workspace run (Claude Code, Pi, Codex, or OpenCode host). Reconstructs the trajectory from the session record — JSONL file(s) for Claude/Pi/Codex, the SQLite store for OpenCode — audits methodology adherence against the workspace's own CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md and skill/agent prompts, checks commit discipline and flag dispositions, and assesses substantive quality. Produces a thorough evidence-anchored markdown report. Use after a workspace has been worked on to identify what went well, where the methodology slipped, and what prompts to improve.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a game design document for completeness, internal consistency, implementability, and adherence to project design standards. Run this before handing a design document to programmers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
**MEASUREMENT SKILL** — Benchmark framework for measuring skill effectiveness. A/B tests agent outputs with and without a target skill, scoring correctness, completeness, and pattern adherence. USE FOR: validating skill quality, comparing before/after skill changes, proving skill ROI with data. DO NOT USE FOR: general testing, unit tests, CI pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive healthcare system compliance and security audit: review HIPAA Privacy and Security Rule adherence, check HITECH and 21st Century Cures Act obligations, validate clinical data integrity for HL7 FHIR and patient safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reassesses annually the patient’s use of self-monitoring blood glucose to calibrate the CGM system. Triggered by ‘Yearly calibration practice review’ or ‘Annual check of SMBG calibration adherence’.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suggests CSII with good adherence to monitoring and dosing for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have poor glycemic control despite intensive insulin therapy, oral agents, other injectable therapy, and lifestyle modifications. Trigger phrases include 'T2DM on multiple injectables still uncontrolled' and 'Consider pump for insulin-requiring T2DM failing other therapies'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suggests using longer-acting glucocorticoids when standard hydrocortisone regimens are impractical due to nonavailability, poor adherence, or need for once-daily dosing. Triggers include glucocorticoid replacement therapy decisions where patients report difficulty with multiple daily doses, lack of access to hydrocortisone, or preference for simplified regimens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform a post-implementation retrospective analysis measuring spec adherence, implementation deviations, and lessons learned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforces project coding standards during code review: naming conventions (PascalCase for classes, camelCase for methods/variables, UPPER_SNAKE_CASE for constants, kebab-case for files), standard file structure, anti-magic-number policy, file size limits (500/800 lines), security patterns, and design patterns. Use when reviewing code, writing new code, or checking adherence to project conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert security auditor specializing in comprehensive security assessments, compliance validation, and risk management. Masters security frameworks, audit methodologies, and compliance standards with focus on identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring regulatory adherence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor Spring Boot and Java code to improve maintainability, readability, and adherence to enterprise best practices. This skill transforms messy Spring Boot applications into clean, well-structured solutions following SOLID principles and Spring Boot 3.x conventions. It addresses fat controllers, improper transaction boundaries, field injection anti-patterns, and scattered configuration. Leverages Java 21+ features including record patterns, pattern matching for switch, virtual threads, and sequenced collections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically review pull requests, feature implementations, and code changes to ensure quality, maintainability, security, and adherence to best practices. Use when reviewing code before merging, conducting peer reviews, performing self-reviews, auditing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, ensuring consistent coding standards, verifying test coverage, assessing performance implications, evaluating architectural decisions, or providing constructive feedback to improve team code quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects. Use at the end of development (before PR) for self-review, or to review pull requests. Validates code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous rule adherence checker. Scans the codebase for rule violations, fixes the highest-impact ones in an isolated worktree, runs full validation, creates a PR. Uses memory to track progress across runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translates Chinese resumes and business texts into professional English, and adapts personal experiences into compelling MBA application essays with strict adherence to prompts and word counts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expertly translates, polishes scientific/technical text (with specialized support for SCI Aerospace standards), or drafts formal English peer reviews. Ensures accuracy, clarity, and adherence to high academic standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects. Use at the end of development (before PR) for self-review, or to review pull requests. Validates code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes for correctness, consistency, performance, accessibility, and adherence to repo conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。