「advisory」の検索結果

End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

投行并购 (投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship banking、长期 coverage、reputational capital)」, 「叙事/包装 (the story, equity story, positioning) ⇄ 数字/尽调 (the numbers, diligence, quality of earnings)」, 「估值的科学外衣 (DCF/comps 的伪精确) ⇄ 谈判的真实定价 (价格由 leverage、竞争、时机决定)」; (b) 估值与分析正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — DCF (折现现金流: FCF 预测/WACC 折现率/terminal value 终值/Gordon growth vs exit multiple), Comparable Companies (可比公司/trading comps: EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/E), Precedent Transactions (先例交易/deal comps: control premium 控制权溢价), LBO (杠杆收购模型: IRR/MOIC/debt schedule/sources & uses), Accretion/Dilution (增厚/摊薄分析: EPS 影响、pro forma), Sum-of-the-Parts (分部估值/SOTP), Football Field (估值区间图), Merger Model (合并模型: synergies 协同/purchase accounting/goodwill), Sensitivity/scenario; (c) 交易流程与产出物 — 卖方流程 (sell-side: teaser 简介 → NDA → CIM/IM 信息备忘录 → management presentation → IOI 意向函 → data room 数据室 → LOI/term sheet → confirmatory diligence → SPA 买卖协议 → signing → closing), 买方流程 (buy-side: thesis/sourcing → outreach → valuation → bid → exclusivity → diligence → financing → close), auction 类型 (broad/targeted/negotiated/preemptive bid); 产出物: pitchbook 推介材料、CIM、fairness opinion 公平意见、board presentation、fee letter、engagement letter; (d) 交易结构与条款 — consideration (cash/stock/mix/earnout 对赌)、deal protections (breakup fee 分手费/go-shop/no-shop/MAC 重大不利变化条款)、representations & warranties 陈述与保证、escrow 托管、working capital adjustment 营运资金调整、reverse termination fee、collar 价格区间、tender offer vs merger、hostile vs friendly、defensive tactics (poison pill 毒丸/white knight 白衣骑士/staggered board); (e) 行业结构与角色 — bulge bracket (高盛/摩根士丹利/JPM/BofA/花旗) vs elite boutique (Centerview/Evercore/Moelis/Lazard/PJT/Perella) vs middle market (Houlihan Lokey/William Blair/Harris Williams) vs regional/independent; analyst→associate→VP→director→MD 晋升金字塔; coverage (行业组) vs product (M&A/ECM/DCM/leveraged finance/restructuring); sponsors group (服务 PE); 买方包括 PE/strategic acquirer/corp dev; (f) 量化指标与节奏 — deal fee (success fee 业内通常约 1-2% 视规模递减/retainer/Lehman formula)、league table 排行榜、pitch→mandate 转化、deal velocity、hours culture (analyst 80-100h/week 文化批判)、bonus/comp 结构、deal sheet (简历上的成交清单); (g) 争议/批判 — fairness opinion 是否橡皮图章 (利益冲突: 出意见的 banker 也收成交费)、estimate 的伪精确 (DCF garbage in garbage out、假设驱动结论)、banker 永远建议成交 (deal 偏见、empire building 助推 CEO 自利并购)、协同效应系统性高估 (大量并购毁灭价值、winner's curse 赢家诅咒)、analyst 血汗工厂文化 (2021 高盛 13 人 deck 事件、过劳死争议)、advisory 价值 vs 中介寻租之争、bulge vs boutique 的利益独立性叙事 (boutique 标榜「无承销利益冲突」)、SPAC 泡沫与 de-SPAC 教训; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 估值学派 (Aswath Damodaran 估值教父/纽大、Tim Koller McKinsey《Valuation》、McKinsey valuation 体系) vs 公司金融教科书派 (Rosenbaum & Pearl《Investment Banking》行业圣经、Brealey Myers Allen、CFI/WSP/BIWS 培训体系) vs 交易实战派 (Bruce Wasserstein《Big Deal》、Joseph Perella/Felix Rohatyn 老派 dealmaker、现代 boutique 创始人) vs 行为/批判派 (并购毁灭价值的学术证据、Damodaran 对协同/控制权溢价的批判、Matt Levine《Money Stuff》解构华尔街逻辑) vs PE/buy-side 视角 (LBO 数学、value creation 杠杆/运营/multiple expansion)。不含: 二级市场股票交易/卖方研究 (equity research)、零售财富管理/private banking、纯 ECM/IPO 承销执行 (虽相关但聚焦 M&A advisory)、纯 PE 投后运营、量化交易/对冲基金策略、纯公司财务报表会计。) Master OS — automated mastery of 投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (rela

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose a product's growth model, stage, and current constraint, then route the request to the narrowest Gingiris specialist and execute it when installed. Use for broad or uncertain growth questions involving go-to-market, Product Hunt, GitHub stars, open-source marketing, B2B SaaS, PLG, ASO, SEO/GEO, AI citations, KOL outreach, UGC, international expansion, user interviews, competitor research, or community programs. Trigger when users ask “how do I grow or launch this,” “which growth skill should I use,” 怎么增长、怎么发布、出海、冷启动、增长策略、不知道用哪个 skill、開発者マーケティング, or 성장 전략. Includes B2B pipeline and B2C activation-retention model selection, specialist handoff rules, relevant gingiris.tools recommendations, and advisory-services guidance.

Structures IAC/LPAC design with composition, authority scope, conflict review protocols, and valuation oversight. Use when designing advisory committees, defining LPAC authority, or structuring conflict resolution processes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and maintain a library collection through acquisitions, weeding (deaccessioning), collection assessment, reader advisory, and interlibrary loan coordination. Covers selection criteria, collection development policies, the CREW/MUSTIE method for weeding, usage analysis, and responsive collection management. Use when building a new collection with a defined scope and budget, assessing an existing collection for gaps or outdated materials, when shelves are overcrowded and systematic weeding is needed, or when establishing a formal collection development policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run bounded, read-only semantic advisory sidecar passes for candidate mapping, issue triage, upstream diffs, evidence verification triage, and meta audit hints. Enforces monthly spend limits with explicit fallback to worker-luna.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Advisory Council — a multi-perspective market analysis that spawns 5 AI advisors (The Skeptic, The Macro Bull, The Risk Manager, The Technical Analyst, The Contrarian) powered by MiniMax M2...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cycle-end retrospective converting recurring judgment failures into durable enforcement. Reviews the cycle's friction — repeated user corrections, guard trips, RCA themes, integrate failures — and turns each recurring one into a landmines.md entry, then proposes graduation candidates up the enforcement funnel (landmine → advisory hook → hard gate). Pairs with standup: standup says what shipped and what's next; retrospective says what kept going wrong and how to stop it structurally. Writes only memory entries and a report — graduation proposals are advisory and require the normal seed.md amendment path to become enforcement. Invoke at the end of a release cycle, an epic, or any stretch of work with repeated friction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer whether a specific advisory reaches anything in THIS repository — which manifest declares the package, at what version, whether the version is in range, and whether the vulnerable code is reachable. Use when someone asks "does CVE-… affect us", when triaging an advisory against a real codebase, or before spending effort on a fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kelly Insurance Intel: App-in-Skill daily industry intelligence cockpit for insurance and wealth advisory (Busabase App-in-Skill). Use when the user asks about insurance, wealth advisory, client risk reminders, market news, policyholder follow-up,保险, or financial-advisor sales scenes. Prepares news/source signals, buyer-intent interpretation, approved sales actions, and channel drafts for review before any external handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kelly Financial Services Intel: App-in-Skill daily industry intelligence cockpit for financial services, investment advisory, and family offices (Busabase App-in-Skill). Use when the user asks about financial services, investment advisory, market explainers, client memos, family office,投顾,金融服务, or family-office scenes. Prepares news/source signals, buyer-intent interpretation, approved sales actions, and channel drafts for review before any external handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Client advisory communication with fiduciary tone, compliance-friendly language, and plain-language financial education

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide advisory guidance for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration in AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with public-doc citations and cloud-specific MCP verification plans. Use for conceptual questions such as `statfileslevel`, filter rules, URL decomposition, cache invalidation behavior, rewrite behavior, and security headers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide advisory guidance for the Adobe Dispatcher Apache HTTP Server module and related HTTPD configuration in AEMaaCS cloud workflows only, with public-doc citations and cloud-specific MCP verification plans. Use for conceptual questions such as `statfileslevel`, filter rules, URL decomposition, cache invalidation behavior, rewrite behavior, and security headers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AIへの依頼文から目的や不足情報を整理し、作業範囲に合うECCのコマンドやスキルを提案します。診断と改善理由を添え、そのまま貼り付けて使える依頼文に書き直します。

• 曖昧な開発依頼を具体化したいとき
• 依頼文に完了条件と検証を加えたいとき
• 作業に合うECCの構成を選びたいとき

正解が一つに定まらない判断を、長期的な影響、前提への疑問、実行の現実性、失敗リスクの四つの視点で検討し、反対意見も見える形で推奨案をまとめるスキル。

• 今すぐ公開するか改善を待つか決めたいとき
• 段階的展開と一斉展開を比較したいとき
• 範囲の縮小と長期的な狙いを検討したいとき

開発の目的に合うECCのコマンド群を選び、実行順序と停止条件を案内します。現在のファイルを基に一覧も整理し、複数コマンドの使い分けを助けます。

• バグ修正のコマンド順序を知りたいとき
• MVP開発のコマンドを選びたいとき
• ECCの作業手順を一覧で見たいとき

Retrieve composite country risk intelligence — Country Instability Index (CII), travel advisory level, and active sanctions exposure — for one country by ISO code. Use when the user asks how risky or unstable a country is right now.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run or inspect the local Release-Green observer for an exact base or combined PR candidate, separating hard failures, advisory drift and incomplete evidence. Use for maintainer preflight; full CI acceptance remains a separate requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infuse social-emotional learning (SEL) into a concept-centered OpenMAIC classroom as a parallel learning goal. Use when the user asks to add emotional awareness, self-management, empathy, collaboration, relationship skills, resilience, or responsible decision-making to a subject lesson. Do not use when SEL itself should be the standalone content of a counseling, advisory, psychology, or homeroom lesson.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect UEFI Secure Boot bypasses and bootkits such as BlackLotus and Bootkitty by verifying Secure Boot state, checking dbx revocation currency, and hashing EFI boot binaries against known-bad sets using mokutil, efi-readvar/dbxtool, CHIPSEC, sbverify/pesign, and Windows Confirm-SecureBootUEFI. Use when auditing fleet dbx rollout after a bootkit advisory or hunting for pre-OS persistence on a suspected-compromised endpoint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage npm packages and lockfiles for install-script malware, credential exfiltration, and worming behavior using GuardDog, manual tarball inspection, and dynamic detonation with network/filesystem monitoring. Use when vetting a new dependency, reviewing a package.json/package-lock.json during code review, checking lockfiles against a supply-chain advisory's known-bad versions, or investigating a host suspected of installing a trojanized package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish a repeatable operational process for triaging, testing, and deploying Microsoft Patch Tuesday security updates (Windows, Office, Exchange, SQL Server, Azure) via WSUS/SCCM within risk-based remediation SLAs, from advisory review through validation. Use when building or improving a monthly patch management workflow or prioritizing which CVEs to remediate first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。