126 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Master TDD orchestrator specializing in red-green-refactor discipline, multi-agent workflow coordination, and comprehensive test-driven development practices. Enforces TDD best practices across teams with AI-assisted testing and modern frameworks. Use PROACTIVELY for TDD implementation and governance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Extended thinking: This workflow implements a sophisticated debugging and resolution pipeline that leverages AI-assisted debugging tools and observability platforms to systematically diagnose and res
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-brief + claim-record discipline for delegated or AI-assisted research work. Use when starting any substantive research task or long autonomous run (write the brief first), and when reporting results that will support a claim in a paper or decision (produce the claim record). Keeps faster execution from being confused with credible evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a content library, docs site, or blog for AI-generated filler that's eroding trust and search performance — and triage what to fix, rewrite, or delete. Use when asked to find slop in a content library, audit AI-written content quality, explain why content engagement or rankings dropped after scaling with AI, or set a quality bar for AI-assisted publishing. Produces an audited inventory with per-piece verdicts, the detection signals used, a triage plan, and a publishing quality gate that prevents recurrence. For a single article's AI-citability use aeo-optimizer; for the strategy itself use content-calendar or seo-content-brief.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users build functional product prototypes from natural language or visual mocks using AI coding tools. This skill enables product leaders to bypass engineering bottlenecks and validate ideas through hands-on building.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression testing strategies for AI-assisted development. Sandbox-mode API testing without database dependencies, automated bug-check workflows, and patterns to catch AI blind spots where the same model writes and reviews code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for AI-assisted Unity work that needs live repo discovery, project-derived routing, runtime-owner proof, runtime-visible output hard stops, runtime numeric proof for repeated visible-output failures, state-step guards, multi-agent scope ownership, modular C#/asmdef safety, UI/scene/visual asset gates, data-first content changes, validation, cleanup proof, or durable workflow rules. Best when agents must prove the actual folder/module/scene/prefab/runtime owner before editing, especially runtime UI, generated assets, code graphs, tutorial/state flows, guided selection/action flows, overlay/dim source-bound mistakes, coordinate conversions, focus/highlight/marker/HUD alignment, predictive lead aiming, ballistic trajectories, spatial IoU verification, or repeated "fix still not visible" failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining or planning around AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review pilot, author feedback, SPC/AC discussion, and final decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create SEO pages at scale using templates and data—including AI-assisted, grounded copy for per-URL differentiation (vs rigid mail-merge templates). Also use when the user mentions "programmatic SEO," "programmatic SEO pages," "template pages," "scale content," "location pages," "city pages," "comparison pages at scale," "X vs Y pages," "integration pages," "pages from data," "automated landing pages," or "programmatic landing pages." Uses a playbook matrix aligned to skills under skills/pages. For user-facing template galleries or marketplaces (browse → use), use template-page-generator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrates a traditional Power Pages site from Bootstrap 3 to Bootstrap 5. Downloads the site, runs the pac pages bootstrap-migrate engine, reviews the change report, applies AI-assisted fixes for the residual hierarchy/CSS changes the engine only flags, uploads the migrated site (which auto-enables the Bootstrap 5 runtime flag), verifies the flag, and validates. Use when the user wants to upgrade an older Bootstrap-3 portal to Bootstrap 5. NOT for code sites (React/Vue/Angular/Astro) — those are never Bootstrap-3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-format content adaptation. Turning one substantial piece into many derivative formats (blog series, email sequences, social posts, webinars, podcasts, video shorts) without losing the original's value or producing AI-slop variants. The discipline of adaptation per medium rather than mass-blast distribution. Triggers on content repurposing, content adaptation, cross-format content, content atomization, content multiplication, content distribution across formats, source-piece-to-derivative, video shorts from blog, email from whitepaper, podcast from article, blog series from research. Also triggers when a flagship piece is shipping but the team has not planned how to extend it across formats, when repurposing is happening but the derivatives feel mass-produced, or when AI-assisted repurposing is producing slop variants of strong source pieces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes, generates, and enhances CLAUDE.md files for any project type using best practices, modular architecture support, and tech stack customization. Use when setting up new projects, improving existing CLAUDE.md files, or establishing AI-assisted development standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-assisted generation of MCQs (multiple-choice questionnaires) with export to Moodle (GIFT, XML), Wooclap (Excel), Kahoot!, and Word. Supports light MCQs (gamified) and in-depth MCQs (evaluative), with single-answer and multiple-answer formats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Framework for demonstrating AI capabilities in legal contexts. Provides detailed personas across tenant law, business contracts, startup disputes, employment claims, and consumer protection with progressive complexity scenarios. Use when: (1) Demonstrating AI-powered legal triage or intake systems, (2) Showcasing responsible AI-assisted client interactions, (3) Training staff on appropriate AI use in legal contexts, (4) Creating realistic scenarios for legal tech presentations, (5) Developing educational materials about AI in legal services, or (6) Testing AI-powered legal information systems in controlled environments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and review path to genuinely own the decision rather than merely approve, sign, or transmit it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design metacognitive checkpoints that prevent AI-assisted learning from bypassing genuine understanding. Use when students use AI tools and may overestimate their own comprehension.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-assisted pair programming with multiple modes (driver/navigator/switch), real-time verification, quality monitoring, and comprehensive testing. Supports TDD, debugging, refactoring, and learning sessions. Features automatic role switching, continuous code review, security scanning, and performance optimization with truth-score verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates tests that capture current behavior of existing code before refactoring. Use when you need a safety net before AI-assisted refactoring or modifying legacy code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Efficiently package context for AI-assisted analysis. Use when preparing to work with Claude on analysis, organizing context documents, or structuring prompts for complex analytical tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support EU Market Abuse Regulation concerns, market surveillance, suspicious order and transaction reports, insider dealing controls, unlawful disclosure controls, market manipulation detection, inside information disclosure workflows, insider-list evidence, PDMR transaction notifications, alert explainability, model or rule provenance, reviewer decisions, or compliance escalation. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java trading surveillance system for MAR controls; Design suspicious order and transaction monitoring evidence; Add alert explainability and reviewer-decision audit trails; Assess AI-assisted market-abuse detection before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that use GenAI, LLMs, AI-assisted coding, RAG, AI agents, generated code, generated dependencies, prompt workflows, external model providers, or AI-enabled business logic and need ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system-aware engineering guidance. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。