「architectural」の検索結果

Creates or updates project documentation for a feature, system, or component and publishes it to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants feature or system documentation written to Confluence, posted to a Confluence space or page, or synced to a Confluence location. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not document to local files only — use project-documentation for that. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence for that. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence for that. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record. Does not create coding standards — use coding-standard. Does not produce runbooks — use runbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and maintains project documentation for features, systems, and components. Use when documenting how a feature, system, or component works — including writing, updating, or organizing docs. Does not scan or detect the project's technology stack — use project-discovery for repository analysis and config detection. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not create or update coding standards — use coding-standard instead. Does not generate PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that. Does not rewrite existing prose for readability — use edit-for-readability for that. Does not produce an ephemeral, understand-now overview of code or a PR — use code-overview for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update a runbook for an operational scenario — an incident an alert fires for, a recurring scheduled task, or a known failure mode on a live service — using a consistent template. Use when writing, drafting, authoring, or updating a runbook for an alert, incident, on-call procedure, scheduled maintenance, or operational SOP. Applies a YAGNI preflight requiring the scenario to be real before producing the runbook. Does not produce feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not record architectural decisions — use architectural-decision-record. Does not create coding standards — use coding-standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure existing code without changing its behavior, through a test-gated refactoring loop: a named target, a green suite over that target before any edit, a planned sequence of small named refactorings, and the full suite re-run after every step. Use when the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, simplify, or improve the design of existing code, or to apply refactoring recommendations from a code-review or architectural-analysis report. This skill changes code; it does not review code (use code-review), assess architecture (use architectural-analysis), plan a multi-module restructure before executing it (use plan-a-change), map domain boundaries before restructuring along them (use ddd-analysis), or build new behavior test-first (use tdd). Do not use it on code inside an active tdd loop; the refactor step of tdd owns that cleanup. Runs its planned sequence to completion without pausing for review; to review each named refactoring as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates and updates coding standards, conventions, rules, and guidelines for the current project. Use when creating new standards from scratch, converting existing documents into coding standards, or updating existing standards. Does not create architectural decision records — use architectural-decision-record for ADRs. Does not write feature or system documentation — use project-documentation for that. Does not research open-ended options — use research. Does not produce runbooks for operational scenarios — use runbook for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture Decision Framework workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture Decision Framework workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep Context Builder Skill (Ultra-Granular Pure Context Mode) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Enables ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability or bug finding and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a system's current structural form, identify transformation pressure, and classify transformation readiness. Covers structural inventory, pressure mapping, rigidity assessment, change capacity estimation, and readiness classification for architectural metamorphosis. Use before any significant architectural change to understand the starting point, when a system feels stuck without clear reasons, when external pressure from growth or tech debt is mounting, or as periodic health checks for long-lived systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants to turn code graph analysis into tracked GitHub issues — "audit the architecture", "find god nodes", "triage architectural debt", "run graphify and log issues", "what's over-coupled in this codebase", "create issues from graphify findings", "check for structural problems", "scan for architectural smells", or any request that combines codebase topology analysis with issue tracking. This skill runs graphify to build a dependency graph, parses GRAPH_REPORT.md for god nodes and structural patterns, converts findings into GitHub issue payloads, and optionally pushes them to the repo. It bridges static analysis and project management in a single automated pass. Requires graphify and gh CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs an architectural and quality code review on a specified file or set of files. Checks for coding standard compliance, architectural pattern adherence, SOLID principles, testability, and performance concerns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Architectural and Civil Drafter — setting up a CAD sheet at the correct scale and viewport scale factor, applying NCS/AIA layer and sheet-numbering standards, dimensioning a wall assembly or site plan per governing convention, managing xrefs and revision clouds across a sheet set, or QC-checking a drawing set before issuance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous comprehensive refactoring. Three-phase pipeline — Phase 1 /refactor (tactical, loops internally to convergence) → Phase 2 loop of /review-arch + /implement-batch until architectural findings converge below a severity floor (default HIGH+) → Phase 3 /refactor (catches tactical issues introduced by restructuring). Auto-approves /review-arch ticket proposals; pulls the andon cord on contested findings, breaking-change proposals, repeated implementation failure, or Phase-2 hard-cap exhaustion (5 architectural iterations).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master software architect specializing in modern architecture patterns, clean architecture, microservices, event-driven systems, and DDD. Reviews system designs and code changes for architectural integrity, scalability, and maintainability. Use PROACTIVELY for architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

再発しやすい危険な実装パターンを、安全側に倒れる標準パターン・禁止事項・共通層・静的ルール候補へ 変換するスキル。ORM強制、deny-by-default認可、サービス経由I/O、永続化確認後の成功表示などを設計する。 レビューで危険コードを見つけるのではなく、危険コードを書きにくくする設計標準を作ることが目的。 Use when turning repeated defect patterns into safe architectural defaults, forbidden-to-safe mapping tables, common layer designs, and enforceable static analysis rules.

Reinterpret a supplied architecture or structural-detail photograph as a bold relief-print poster with carved marks, a restrained ink palette and a tall condensed title. Use for 建筑版画海报、屋檐木刻海报、architectural linocut posters; not for a generic halftone photo filter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs architectural code reviews focusing on design patterns, duplication, circular dependencies, and refactoring impact. Is the design consistent with the codebase? Use when reviewing code changes for architectural concerns, code smells, or structural issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MAGI System v2 — AoT 分解 + MELCHIOR/BALTHASAR/CASPAR 合議 + lam-harness:gabriel adversarial probe による 構造化意思決定フレームワーク。判断ポイント 2+ / 影響レイヤー 3+ / 選択肢 3+ で使用。 Use when facing complex decisions with multiple trade-offs or architectural choices.

MAGI System v2 — AoT 分解 + MELCHIOR/BALTHASAR/CASPAR 合議 + gabriel adversarial probe による 構造化意思決定フレームワーク。判断ポイント 2+ / 影響レイヤー 3+ / 選択肢 3+ で使用。 Use when facing complex decisions with multiple trade-offs or architectural choices.

Architecture Decision Records (ADR) — a lightweight method for capturing important architectural decisions with context, trade-offs, and rationale. Based on Michael Nygard's ADR pattern and Google/Meta/ByteDance's design documentation culture. USE WHEN: deciding between technology choices, designing new architecture, changing existing architecture, documenting why a decision was made, onboarding new team members, or preserving design context for future maintainers. Triggered by terms like "tech choice", "architecture decision", "why did we choose", "design rationale", "ADR", or "architectural decision record".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Architectural Decision Record (ADR) document for AI-optimized decision documentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。