47 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Creates an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documenting a significant technical decision, its context, alternatives considered, and consequences. Every major technical choice should have an ADR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture architectural decisions made during Claude Code sessions as structured ADRs. Auto-detects decision moments, records context, alternatives considered, and rationale. Maintains an ADR log so future developers understand why the codebase is shaped the way it is.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent collaboration session. Brings 2-4 agent perspectives into one discussion for architecture decisions and trade-off analysis. Use when asked "should we X or Y?", "let's discuss", or "design review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JSON-canonical session memory. Use when capturing session learnings, extracting patterns, or tracking costs — persists to .meowkit/memory JSON stores; matching Markdown files are generated views. Activates during Phase 0 (Orient) to load context and Phase 6 (Reflect) to persist it. NOT for weekly-cadence engineering retrospectives (see mk:retro); NOT for arbitrary file storage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Padrões abrangentes para criar, manter e gerenciar Registros de Decisões de Arquitetura (ADRs) que capturam o contexto e a lógica por trás de decisões técnicas significativas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns one decision discussion (meeting transcript, chat thread, email chain or notes) into a DRAFT one-page decision memo: the decision as stated, status, options considered, evidence cited, dissent recorded verbatim, owner, effective date and review date, with UNKNOWN for anything the discussion did not settle. Use when the user asks to "write up the decision", "record what we decided", "capture the decision from this thread", "draft the decision memo" or "add this to the decision log". Do not use for full minutes or action items, use transcript-to-actions instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for a paper seeking a decision not yet taken, use board-paper-skeleton. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts an architecture or design decision record (ADR) from the discussion notes, design review minutes, chat threads and diagram descriptions the user provides: context, decision drivers, options considered with arguments as stated, the decision as the group worded it, consequences and a review date, with every factual claim tagged evidenced, asserted or UNKNOWN so unsupported claims are marked for the author to substantiate. Use when the user asks to "write an ADR", "document the architecture decision", "record why we chose this design", "turn these design review notes into a decision record" or "draft the design decision log entry". Do not use for a business or governance decision with no technical design, use decision-memo-builder instead; for the change ticket that implements the decision, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architect...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architectural choices, or establishing decision processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document technical decisions as Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) with context, options considered, and rationale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Codeセッション中に行われたアーキテクチャ上の意思決定を構造化されたADRとして記録する。意思決定の瞬間を自動検出し、コンテキスト、検討された代替案、根拠を記録する。将来の開発者がコードベースの形状の理由を理解できるようADRログを維持する。
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following best practices for technical decision documentation. Use when documenting significant technical decisions, reviewing past architect...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically evaluate architecture decisions, document trade-offs, and select appropriate patterns. This skill should be used when the user asks about 'architecture decision', 'ADR', 'design pattern selection', 'technology choice', or needs to evaluate architectural trade-offs. Keywords: architecture, ADR, patterns, trade-offs, technical debt, quality attributes, decision record.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture Decision Records (ADR) — a lightweight method for capturing important architectural decisions with context, trade-offs, and rationale. Based on Michael Nygard's ADR pattern and Google/Meta/ByteDance's design documentation culture. USE WHEN: deciding between technology choices, designing new architecture, changing existing architecture, documenting why a decision was made, onboarding new team members, or preserving design context for future maintainers. Triggered by terms like "tech choice", "architecture decision", "why did we choose", "design rationale", "ADR", or "architectural decision record".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。