「bias」の検索結果

Use this skill when defining AI governance policies, designing human oversight workflows, documenting bias mitigation strategies, or meeting regulatory transparency requirements for Salesforce AI features. Trigger keywords: responsible AI, AI bias, AI audit trail, AI transparency, human-in-the-loop, AI risk inventory, AI disclosure. NOT for the MLOps pipeline or Policy-as-Code engine architecture — use architect/ai-governance-architecture. NOT for Trust Layer technical configuration — use agentforce/einstein-trust-layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit AI systems for bias and fairness. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-bias-audit related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit AI systems for bias with testing frameworks and mitigation strategies. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-bias-auditor related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build robust backtesting systems for trading strategies with proper handling of look-ahead bias, survivorship bias, and transaction costs. Use when developing trading algorithms, validating strategies, or building backtesting infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral finance applications: theories of overreaction and underreaction, behavioral explanations for momentum and reversal, investor sentiment cycles, cognitive-bias checklists, and debiasing quantitative strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track ML experiments with automatic logging, visualize training in real-time, optimize hyperparameters with sweeps, and manage model registry with W&B - collaborative MLOps platform

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extend context windows of transformer models using RoPE, YaRN, ALiBi, and position interpolation techniques. Use when processing long documents (32k-128k+ tokens), extending pre-trained models beyond original context limits, or implementing efficient positional encodings. Covers rotary embeddings, attention biases, interpolation methods, and extrapolation strategies for LLMs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track ML experiments with automatic logging, visualize training in real-time, optimize hyperparameters with sweeps, and manage model registry with W&B - collaborative MLOps platform

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extend context windows of transformer models using RoPE, YaRN, ALiBi, and position interpolation techniques. Use when processing long documents (32k-128k+ tokens), extending pre-trained models beyond original context limits, or implementing efficient positional encodings. Covers rotary embeddings, attention biases, interpolation methods, and extrapolation strategies for LLMs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when modifying `resources/workflow-schema.json` in cc-wf-studio to influence how AI agents generate workflows via the cc-workflow-ai-editor skill. Triggers include "AIが特定のノードタイプを選んでくれない", "ワークフロー生成のバイアスを調整したい", "スキーマの description を変えたい", "新しいノードタイプを追加したい", "嘘の制約がスキーマに混じっていないか確認したい". Covers what the schema actually does (instructions to AI, not runtime constraints), the design philosophy (align direction, do not prescribe rules), the build pipeline (.json → .toon auto-generated), and known bias sources to audit.

VS-Enhanced Evidence Quality Appraiser - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive quality assessment Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids automatic tool application, delivers research-specific evaluation strategies Use when: appraising study quality, assessing risk of bias, grading evidence Triggers: quality appraisal, RoB, GRADE, Newcastle-Ottawa, risk of bias, methodological quality

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

APSA style checker for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks numbers, capitalization, abbreviations, italics, in-text citations, titles of works, neutral and unbiased language, and APSA-specific terminology against the APSA Style Manual for Political Science (2018, updated 2023). Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to check APSA style, fix citations, review capitalization, check number formatting, or flag biased language in a .qmd document. For grammar, spelling, and punctuation, use the proofread skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track ML experiments with automatic logging, visualize training in real-time, optimize hyperparameters with sweeps, and manage model registry with W&B - collaborative MLOps platform

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clinical Research Bias Assessment - Case-Control Study (NOS) v2.3.0. Use when you need to assess the bias of a case-control study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria, or when evaluating the quality of a medical paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build robust backtesting systems for trading strategies with proper handling of look-ahead bias, survivorship bias, and transaction costs. Use when developing trading algorithms, validating strategies, or building backtesting infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold and run a reproducible Monte Carlo simulation study in R — a declared assumption regime, a parameterized DGP, an estimator grid, a seeded replication loop, and a summary of bias, RMSE, empirical SE, coverage, size/power with Monte Carlo standard errors. Use when the user says "run a Monte Carlo simulation", "simulation study", "check the bias/coverage of an estimator", "compare estimators in simulation", "size and power simulation", "Monte Carlo experiment", or wants to demonstrate an estimator's finite-sample properties. Produces a numbered R script in `scripts/R/` and saves per-replication raw results + a summary table to `output/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating or auditing an agent-team sitemap, Task Bias ledger, concept coverage, product surface map, validation chain, or missing-concept check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predict peptide-MHC class I binding and natural presentation with MHCflurry, NetMHCpan-4.1, and MixMHCpred to nominate candidate CD8 T-cell epitopes. Covers the binding-affinity (BA) vs eluted-ligand (EL/presentation) distinction, why %Rank beats raw nM for cross-allele work, the MS abundance bias that misranks low-expression neoantigens, allele-coverage inequity, and length bias. Use when scanning a protein or peptide set for class I epitopes, scoring neoantigen candidates, or choosing a binding predictor. For CD4/HLA class II see mhc-class-ii-prediction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。