Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
353 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Challenge a confirmed task, decision, plan, or artifact through adaptive skeptical questions. Use when you need to expose assumptions before acting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a client case study that sells future work — challenge, approach, results. Use when asked to write a case study, a client success story, a project write-up, or a portfolio case for consulting/agency work. Produces a results-led case study — the client & challenge, your approach, quantified outcomes, a client quote slot, and a takeaway — structured to win the next client. Ready to export as a designed PDF.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimise a learning activity for flow by balancing challenge level, skill, clear goals, and immediate feedback. Use when students are bored, anxious, or disengaged during a task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Challenge mode reviews - rigorous questioning before approving changes. Use when you want thorough scrutiny of Ecto…
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Challenge mode reviews - rigorous questioning before approving changes. Use when you want thorough scrutiny of Ecto changes, LiveView events, OTP designs, or PR readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Challenge mode reviews - rigorous questioning before approving changes. Use when you want thorough scrutiny of Ecto changes, LiveView events, OTP designs, or PR readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
获取TikTok指定话题作品数据。基于红狐数据,查询 TikTok 话题下的作品列表,默认按播放数降序输出播放、点赞、评论、分享等核心数据与可点击完整作品链接,支持分页与排序切换。适用于用户要求查询 TikTok 话题作品、话题ID数据、hashtag/challenge 作品列表时使用。触发词:TikTok话题作品、话题作品列表、TikTok话题数据、hashtag作品列表、challenge作品列表。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Presents adaptive codebase challenge questions with multiple-choice and trace exercises. Use when testing contributor knowledge of the codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CTF challenge router - fingerprint a challenge (file type / prompt / artifacts) into its category (pwn, rev, crypto, forensics, stego, web, osint, hash) and route to the matching wiki page, tools, and first moves. Wiki-first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix cert-manager DNS01 ACME challenges stuck in "pending" state with "DNS record not yet propagated" inside GKE private clusters, even when TXT records exist in Cloudflare DNS. Use when: (1) cert-manager challenges show "pending" for hours with propagation check failures, (2) dig from outside cluster shows correct TXT records but cert-manager can't verify them, (3) Using Cloudflare DNS01 solver in a GKE private cluster with Cloud NAT, (4) Google Cloud intercepts 8.8.8.8 DNS queries returning NXDOMAIN for Cloudflare-managed records, (5) Even --dns01-recursive-nameservers with 1.1.1.1 doesn't fix the propagation check despite TXT records being verifiable from busybox pods in the same namespace. Covers the full debugging flow and certbot manual workaround.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply systematic problem-solving methodologies to complex challenges. Use when the user says "guide me through structured problem solving" or "I want to crack this challenge with guided problem solving techniques"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Founders face unique challenges in how they work. Maker vs manager schedule conflicts. Default alive vs dead math. Time and money slowly leaking away. Effective founders develop systems for navigating these challenges. This skill synthesizes PG's essays on founder productivity and decision-making into an operating system for founder effectiveness. Use when "keywords, contexts, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and challenge implicit assumptions in plans, proposals, and technical decisions. Use when strategic-cto-mentor needs to surface hidden assumptions and wishful thinking before they become costly mistakes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude Code CLI second opinion for non-Claude Code hosts. Review a diff, challenge a change for failure modes, or consult Claude with read-only repo access and session continuity. Use for "claude review", "claude challenge", "ask claude", or an explicit Claude Code second opinion. (gstack)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimise a learning activity for flow by balancing challenge level, skill, clear goals, and immediate feedback. Use when students are bored, anxious, or disengaged during a task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Working Backwards PRFAQ challenge that stress-tests a product concept customer-first. Use when the user requests to 'create a PRFAQ', 'work backwards', or 'run the PRFAQ challenge'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain conditional authentication challenge policies, reusable authchal and user-transform FromDirectives parsers, safe claim substitution, GitHub ID/organization transforms, registered-factor inventory, passwordless WebAuthn selection, verified AMR access claims, and policy revalidation across portal login, refresh, OIDC, and direct authentication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Challenge a thesis by playing "Devil's Advocate" (Latin: "Advocatus Diaboli"). Use when the user wants a thesis or statement relentlessly challenged or criticised.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Default entrypoint and master ctf-sandbox-orchestrator workflow for CTF, exploit, reverse engineering, DFIR, pwnable, crypto, stego, mobile, AI-agent, cloud, container, Active Directory, Windows-host, and identity challenges. Use first when the user presents challenge infrastructure, binaries, prompts, hosts, or identities that should be treated as sandbox-internal by default and Codex needs to choose, route, and load the right downstream analysis path with concise evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a read-only adversarial Kimi challenge review that questions assumptions, design choices, and tradeoffs. Use when the user wants pushback on whether the approach is right, not a defect-only review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。