Use when a task needs the judgment of a Career/Technical Education Teacher, Postsecondary — defending a shrinking trade or health-science program against a cutback decision, backward-mapping a shop or lab curriculum to an industry credential's exam blueprint, resolving a competency-based grading dispute where a passing average hides a failed safety check-off, or setting the terms of an advisory-committee review or work-based-learning placement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wonsukchoi/domain-experts☆ 212026年10月12日 更新
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Chemistry Teacher — grading a lab report where the numeric result misses the "expected" value but the methodology is sound, distinguishing a conceptual misunderstanding from an arithmetic slip on a problem set, deciding how much procedural freedom to give students on an open-ended lab, or vetting whether a demo/lab procedure is safe to run in this specific room.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wonsukchoi/domain-experts☆ 212026年10月12日 更新
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Business Teacher, Postsecondary — grading case analysis on the rigor of business reasoning rather than matching a single "correct" answer, updating stale textbook examples against current market conditions rather than teaching them as still-current, distinguishing taught analytical frameworks from personal business opinion presented as universal fact, and preserving the incomplete-information trade-offs of real business decisions rather than simplifying problems into false certainty.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wonsukchoi/domain-experts☆ 212026年10月12日 更新
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Art, Drama, or Music Professor — diagnosing a jury/crit score that contradicts a semester of formative work, building a studio-art or performance tenure dossier around exhibitions and productions instead of publications, staffing applied one-on-one lessons or crit sections between adjuncts and full-time faculty, running a structured critique, or deciding whether a failed barrier jury means a change of major.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wonsukchoi/domain-experts☆ 212026年10月12日 更新
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Architecture Teacher, Postsecondary — running studio desk crits and final jury reviews, grading design work on process and constraint-response rather than rendering polish, separating a personal design-style opinion from an objective functional or code flaw during critique, and checking whether a studio brief's precedent set is stale relative to current construction and code practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wonsukchoi/domain-experts☆ 212026年10月12日 更新
Install bioinformatics tools for ENCODE data analysis. Covers CLI tools (BWA, STAR, samtools, MACS2), R/Bioconductor packages (DESeq2, Seurat, ChIPseeker), Python packages (Scanpy, deeptools), and Nextflow pipeline infrastructure. Generates conda environments, R install scripts, and Python requirements. Use when the user needs to set up a bioinformatics workstation, install tools for a specific assay, create reproducible environments, or troubleshoot dependency issues. Trigger on: install tools, set up environment, conda create, bioinformatics setup, install R packages, install Bioconductor, install pipeline tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ammawla/encode-toolkit☆ 212026年9月27日 更新
Implements multiplicity control for confirmatory clinical trials using graphical procedures (Bretz-Maurer-Hommel), gatekeeping (parallel, serial, mixed), Hochberg/Hommel/Holm with PRDS, and the closed-testing principle (Marcus-Peritz-Gabriel; Goeman 2021 admissibility). Covers FDA Multiple Endpoints Final Guidance (October 2022), graphical procedures via R gMCP, primary + key-secondary + subgroup hierarchies, and FWER vs FDR distinction. Use when designing the multiplicity strategy for confirmatory trials with multiple primary or key secondary endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
lilinji/GeneTind-Life-Skills☆ 142026年8月21日 更新
ScalarDBの制約を考慮したデータモデル設計を行います。Partition Key・Clustering Key・Secondary Index の設計、ホットスポット評価、メタデータオーバーヘッド見積もり、バックエンドDB選定を含みます。ワークフローStep 04(データモデル設計)で使用します。
wfukatsu/coding-agent-for-scalardb☆ 62026年2月19日 更新
Implements multiplicity control for confirmatory clinical trials using graphical procedures (Bretz-Maurer-Hommel), gatekeeping (parallel, serial, mixed), Hochberg/Hommel/Holm with PRDS, and the closed-testing principle (Marcus-Peritz-Gabriel; Goeman 2021 admissibility). Covers FDA Multiple Endpoints Final Guidance (October 2022), graphical procedures via R gMCP, primary + key-secondary + subgroup hierarchies, and FWER vs FDR distinction. Use when designing the multiplicity strategy for confirmatory trials with multiple primary or key secondary endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
huang-sh/DeepScience☆ 42026年7月15日 更新
Windows アプリ開発 (Windows App SDK / WinRT) の OS 統合 API リファレンス。 DeviceInformation, DeviceWatcher, センサー (Accelerometer, Gyrometer, Compass, OrientationSensor, Pedometer, ActivitySensor), Bluetooth LE, USB, Serial, HID, Battery, HttpClient, StreamSocket, WebSocket, BackgroundDownloader/Uploader, NetworkInformation, PointerInput, KeyboardInput, FocusManager, DragAndDrop, IME/TextInput, Calendar, DateTimeFormatter, CurrencyFormatter, ResourceLoader (多言語化・地域化), PasswordVault, CryptographicBuffer, WindowsHello/Passkeys, WebAuthenticationBroker, Clipboard, DataTransferManager, Launcher, JumpList, TaskbarManager, SecondaryTile, StartupTask, ProtocolActivation。
Fandhe-AI/agent-reference-skills☆ 42026年10月13日 更新
Implements multiplicity control for confirmatory clinical trials using graphical procedures (Bretz-Maurer-Hommel), gatekeeping (parallel, serial, mixed), Hochberg/Hommel/Holm with PRDS, and the closed-testing principle (Marcus-Peritz-Gabriel; Goeman 2021 admissibility). Covers FDA Multiple Endpoints Final Guidance (October 2022), graphical procedures via R gMCP, primary + key-secondary + subgroup hierarchies, and FWER vs FDR distinction. Use when designing the multiplicity strategy for confirmatory trials with multiple primary or key secondary endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
peacezha/TRACE☆ 32026年10月11日 更新
Implements multiplicity control for confirmatory clinical trials using graphical procedures (Bretz-Maurer-Hommel), gatekeeping (parallel, serial, mixed), Hochberg/Hommel/Holm with PRDS, and the closed-testing principle (Marcus-Peritz-Gabriel; Goeman 2021 admissibility). Covers FDA Multiple Endpoints Final Guidance (October 2022), graphical procedures via R gMCP, primary + key-secondary + subgroup hierarchies, and FWER vs FDR distinction. Use when designing the multiplicity strategy for confirmatory trials with multiple primary or key secondary endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
peacezha/HPClaw☆ 32026年10月11日 更新
Write and run B2B cold outbound that gets replies, from cold emails and follow-ups to sending setup, LinkedIn, multichannel cadences, and reply handling. Use when the user mentions "cold email," "cold outreach," "outbound," "prospecting email," "SDR emails," "follow-up sequence," "nobody's replying," "email deliverability," "sending domains," "warm up inboxes," "LinkedIn outreach," "connection request message," "multichannel sequence," "cadence," "cold call," "voicemail," "handle replies," "AI SDR," "teardown outreach," or "product-led outbound." Send from secondary domains, verify lists first, turn off open tracking, and stop every channel when a prospect replies. Copy avoids AI tells like 'it's not X, it's Y' reveals. For building the list and account research, see prospecting. For lifecycle email, see emails. For call scripts and sales collateral, see sales-enablement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
coreyhaines31/marketingskills☆ 5.5万2026年10月9日 更新
Create premium, Awwwards-quality website designs as React (.jsx) components that look like they were built by a top-tier agency charging $50k+ per project. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a website, landing page, portfolio, or web component that should look expensive, premium, luxury, editorial, high-end, or agency-quality. Also trigger when the user mentions Awwwards, FWA, award-winning design, or references brands like Apple, Aesop, Bottega Veneta, Stripe, or any luxury/fashion/design-forward brand. Trigger when the user says things like "make it look professional", "make it look expensive", "I want it to look really good", "high quality design", "not generic", or expresses dissatisfaction with typical AI-generated website aesthetics. Do NOT trigger for dashboards, admin panels, internal tools, or functional UI where aesthetics are secondary to utility — the standard frontend-design skill handles those.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
davila7/claude-code-templates☆ 3.3万2026年10月12日 更新
Use when designing a prospective clinical study before submission — selecting and classifying endpoints (primary / key-secondary / exploratory, with surrogate-endpoint flagging), estimating sample size and power for two-arm designs (means / proportions / survival), or scoring a study plan for feasibility and a GO / GO-WITH-CONDITIONS / REDESIGN / NO-GO phase-gate decision. Every output is an ESTIMATE plus a named human owner (clinician / biostatistician / regulatory owner) — never clinical fact, never a finished protocol. Distinct from ra-qm-team, which handles the regulatory/QM submission (ISO 13485, EU MDR, FDA 510(k)/PMA/QSR), not the study design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
alirezarezvani/claude-skills☆ 2.8万2026年8月30日 更新
Get a deep critical review of research from GPT using a secondary Codex agent. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep☆ 1.7万2026年10月7日 更新
Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. A secondary Codex agent evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep☆ 1.7万2026年10月7日 更新
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using a secondary Codex agent, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep☆ 1.7万2026年10月7日 更新
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (`claim_supported = yes` or `partial`) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. A secondary Codex agent designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective; the local executor reviews feasibility and implements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep☆ 1.7万2026年10月7日 更新
Route retrieval of Chinese medical guidelines, consensus statements, regulatory documents, drug information, safety notices, standards, and public-health materials through authoritative originals and verified fallback copies. Use when a canonical medical source is blocked, slow, unavailable, moved, paywalled, or difficult to parse, or when designing and auditing domestic medical-source fallback rules. Do not treat secondary summaries or reposts as independent clinical evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TencentCloud/Octop☆ 9,1072026年10月13日 更新
Sets up and runs AFL++ for multi-core fuzzing of C/C++ projects built with afl-clang-fast or afl-gcc-fast. Covers instrumentation modes, parallel main and secondary campaigns, persistent mode, corpus minimization, and crash triage. Use when scaling fuzzing across cores, fuzzing a mature C/C++ codebase, reading the afl-fuzz status screen, or moving on after libFuzzer has plateaued.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
trailofbits/skills☆ 7,5072026年10月10日 更新
Agent C3 - Mixed Methods Design Consultant Comprehensive mixed methods research design specialist covering sequential, concurrent, embedded, and multiphase designs with Morse notation. Core Capabilities: - Sequential Explanatory (QUAN → qual): Explain quantitative results - Sequential Exploratory (QUAL → quan): Develop instruments - Convergent Parallel (QUAN + QUAL): Comprehensive understanding - Embedded (QUAN(qual)): Secondary strand addresses different question - Multiphase: Long-term projects with iterative phases - Morse notation interpretation and recommendation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6062026年10月12日 更新
This skill covers reproducible research pipelines and replication packages. Use when the user is setting up a research project directory structure, configuring workflow managers (Make, Snakemake, DVC), managing computational environments, preparing replication packages for journal submission, or debugging reproducibility failures. Triggers on "reproducible", "replication package", "Makefile", "Snakemake", "DVC", "pipeline", "workflow manager", "data versioning", "conda environment", "Docker", "seed management", "AEA data editor", "replication", "project structure", or "submission checklist".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6062026年10月12日 更新
Install Holoscan SDK via the NGC Docker container. Use for container-based installs; not for native apt/pip/Conda installs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
NVIDIA/skills☆ 3,5822026年10月10日 更新