「constraint」の検索結果

Implement GCP Organization Policy constraints to enforce security guardrails across the entire resource hierarchy, restricting risky configurations and ensuring compliance at organization, folder, and project levels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Z3 SMT solver ile CTF constraint çözme — byte equations, hash collision, validator bypass

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to design, review, or improve validation in Quarkus applications — including Bean Validation on JAX-RS resources, @Valid on parameters and CDI beans, constraint groups, @ConfigMapping validation, custom constraints, nested DTO validation, and ExceptionMapper-based error mapping. This should trigger for requests such as Add validation support in Quarkus; Review Quarkus validation rules; Improve request validation in Quarkus REST APIs; Add custom validation constraints in Quarkus; Validate Quarkus @ConfigMapping properties. Part of cursor-rules-java project

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates custom dotnet new templates for correctness before publishing. Catches missing fields, parameter bugs, shortName conflicts, constraint issues, and common authoring mistakes that cause templates to fail silently. USE FOR: checking template.json files for errors before publishing or testing, diagnosing why a template doesn't appear after installation, reviewing template parameter definitions for type mismatches and missing defaults, finding shortName conflicts with dotnet CLI commands, validating post-action and constraint configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery), creating projects from templates (use template-instantiation), creating templates from existing projects (use template-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when modifying `resources/workflow-schema.json` in cc-wf-studio to influence how AI agents generate workflows via the cc-workflow-ai-editor skill. Triggers include "AIが特定のノードタイプを選んでくれない", "ワークフロー生成のバイアスを調整したい", "スキーマの description を変えたい", "新しいノードタイプを追加したい", "嘘の制約がスキーマに混じっていないか確認したい". Covers what the schema actually does (instructions to AI, not runtime constraints), the design philosophy (align direction, do not prescribe rules), the build pipeline (.json → .toon auto-generated), and known bias sources to audit.

Trace, complete, and interpret the Pareto frontier across competing objectives using repeated single-objective cuOpt solves (weighted-sum and ε-constraint).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for planning, testing, and safely executing PostgreSQL schema migrations — especially when working with production data or shared databases. **Trigger when user asks to:** - Test a schema migration before applying it to production - Add, remove, or rename columns safely on a live table - Change a column's data type without downtime - Add or drop indexes, constraints, or foreign keys on large tables - Understand which ALTER TABLE operations lock the table - Roll back a failed migration - Plan a zero-downtime migration strategy - Fork a database to test a migration safely **Keywords:** migration, schema change, ALTER TABLE, add column, drop column, rename column, change type, zero downtime, lock, AccessExclusiveLock, concurrent index, forking, rollback, backfill, deploy Covers: lock-level reference for every common DDL operation, safe migration patterns, fork-based testing, zero-downtime column changes, index creation, constraint addition, backfill strategies, pre/post-migration validation, and rollback planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategy for solving constraint optimization problems on spatial maps. Use when you need to place items on a grid/map to maximize some objective while satisfying constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parse scheduling constraints from a email text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Roblox physical simulation and queries with assemblies, anchoring, constraints, collision groups, CanCollide/CanTouch/CanQuery, raycasts and overlap queries, mass, impulses, forces, velocity, moving assemblies, cleanup, and network ownership. Use for Roblox collisions, hit detection, RaycastParams, PhysicsService, projectiles, vehicles, knockback, constraints, deprecated BodyMovers, unstable motion, or client-owned physics exploits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a client's wishes into an architectural brief that can actually be designed against — the accommodation schedule, the adjacencies, the budget reality, and the constraints named before they become change orders. Use when asked to write an architectural brief, prepare a project brief for a building, run a client briefing, or capture requirements for a new build or refurbishment. Produces the accommodation schedule with areas, the adjacency and circulation requirements, the site and statutory constraints, the budget and programme reality check, and the explicit exclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the context an AI needs to do a task well — the background, constraints, examples, and format it can't guess — so you get a great result on the first try instead of a generic one you have to keep correcting. Use when asked why does AI give me generic answers, how do I give AI better context, my AI results are mediocre, or how do I get it right the first time. Produces the specific context this task needs (who/what/constraints/examples/format), a reusable primer you can paste ahead of the request, the difference between a starved prompt and a well-briefed one, and what to leave out — turning vague back-and-forth into a strong first result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to verify a Simulink model is compatible with SLCI code inspection, or to apply fixes for identified incompatibilities. Checks model configuration, identifies incompatibilities, and explains why each constraint is required for verification. Also invoked by slci-inspection-incompatibility-analysis to fix constraints and obtain compatibility results. Trigger keywords: checkCompatibility, SLCI compatibility, code inspection readiness, Model Advisor compatibility report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Queries gnomAD v4 (807k samples), v3, v2.1.1, and constraint metrics with grpmax FAF95, bottleneck-group exclusion, LOEUF interpretation, SV/CNV/mtDNA catalogs, and Whiffin max-credible-AF framework. Use when filtering rare variants, applying ACMG BS1/BA1, ranking genes by LoF intolerance, or selecting between v2 (GRCh37 + chrX/Y constraint) and v4 (GRCh38 + 807k samples).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize RF PCB dimensions for bandwidth, return loss, or area via patternsearch and surrogateopt with constraints. TRIGGER: user asks to optimize an RF PCB component for performance (bandwidth, return loss, insertion loss, area) or apply constraints to a design. Invoke BEFORE writing optimization code — RF PCB Toolbox has a built-in optimize() function that differs from generic fmincon/ga approaches. SKIP: designing a component from scratch without an optimization objective (use the specific matlab-design-pcb-* skill), EM analysis without optimization (use matlab-analyze-em), material/stackup setup only (use matlab-manage-pcb-material).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing build-your-own product configurators (Tesla-style, custom-pricing, plan-builders) with constraint logic, real-time pricing, validation, and save-and-share mechanics. Honest about infinite-options (decision paralysis), canned-bundles-only (no real customization), and guided-configuration (smart defaults plus meaningful constraints plus escape hatches) patterns. Triggers on configurator design, build-your-own, custom configuration, plan builder, product customizer, configuration tool. Also triggers when users abandon mid-configuration, when configurator conversion is poor, or when a configurator is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intent-driven spec precipitation — state a constraint in natural language (加一条规范：禁止用 any / 记录架构约束：服务间走 gRPC / 质量规则：覆盖率≥80%) and the workflow infers the category and records a <spec-entry>. Spec = 项目约束规则（编码规范、架构约束、质量标准）；可复用知识文档走 /maestro-knowhow capture。Triggers on "maestro-spec add", "记录规范", "添加约束", "添加规则", "加一条规范", "spec add". Terminology：spec = project constraints/rules (<spec-entry>). Reusable knowledge documents use /maestro-knowhow capture. Learning discoveries from /maestro-learn use <learning-entry> tags in learnings.md (separate from spec entries).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates custom dotnet new templates for correctness before publishing. Catches missing fields, parameter bugs, shortName conflicts, constraint issues, and common authoring mistakes that cause templates to fail silently. USE FOR: checking template.json files for errors before publishing or testing, diagnosing why a template doesn't appear after installation, reviewing template parameter definitions for type mismatches and missing defaults, finding shortName conflicts with dotnet CLI commands, validating post-action and constraint configuration. DO NOT USE FOR: finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery), creating projects from templates (use template-instantiation), creating templates from existing projects (use template-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define database models with clear naming, appropriate data types, constraints, relationships, and validation at multiple layers. Use this skill when creating or modifying database model files, ORM classes, schema definitions, or data model relationships. Apply when working with model files (e.g., models.py, models/, ActiveRecord classes, Prisma schema, Sequelize models), defining table structures, setting up foreign keys and relationships, configuring cascade behaviors, implementing model validations, adding timestamps, or working with database constraints (NOT NULL, UNIQUE, foreign keys). Use for any task involving data integrity enforcement, relationship definitions, or model-level data validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classifies and enforces constraints via soft vows, hard vows, and Nen Court layers. Use when designing or auditing enforcement mechanisms for project rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and summarize core features, constraints, and priorities from requirement documents. Use when analyzing PRDs, RFCs, business requirements, user stories, epics, or any requirement documentation to identify must-have features, technical constraints, priority levels (P0/P1/P2/MoSCoW), and key decision points. Triggers when users ask to summarize, analyze, extract, or understand requirements from documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review factory evidence and propose tighter or looser constraints without editing the charter. Use for a periodic constraint review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Real-world Active Directory environment constraints that silently break attacks when ignored: NTLM disabled (Kerberos fallback), AES-only KDCs (RC4 blocked by GPO), LDAP signing and channel binding requiring LDAPS on 636, Kerberos clock skew (KRB_AP_ERR_SKEW), SPNs that must be FQDNs never short names or IPs (the misleading invalidCredentials), Protected Users / LAPS / gMSA / MachineAccountQuota, LDAP 1000-object paging, and VPN latency. Use this whenever a bind, TGT request, LDAP query, or SMB negotiation fails in a way that looks like bad credentials but is really hardening, or before running any AD tooling against a domain you have not fingerprinted. Standard-tooling knowledge (netexec, impacket, certipy, bloodyAD, kerbrute), no vendor-specific engine.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。