「cost analysis」の検索結果

ECC ToolsのGitHub Appで起きるPRの過剰作成や利用上限の抜け、高額モデルの意図しない使用をコードから追い、費用増加の原因と修正を検証するスキル。

• PRの過剰作成の原因調査
• 利用上限を超える同時処理の点検
• 無料枠での高額モデル利用の確認

Optimize cloud costs across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI through resource rightsizing, tagging strategies, reserved instances, and spending analysis. Use when reducing cloud expenses, analyzing infrastructure costs, or implementing cost governance policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose Day-2 AKS GPU and KAITO incidents using profile-aware, read-only evidence. WHEN: 'Insufficient nvidia.com/gpu', GPU pod Pending, model-load OOM, DCGM/VRAM, KAITO Workspace not ready, or GPU autoscaling. DO NOT USE FOR: setup (airunway-aks-setup), non-GPU incidents (aks-troubleshooting), standalone VM quota (azure-quotas), or generic cost (cost-analysis or cost-optimization from the optional azure-cost plugin).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize cloud costs through resource rightsizing, tagging strategies, reserved instances, and spending analysis. Use when reducing cloud expenses, analyzing infrastructure costs, or implementing cost governance policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose Day-2 AKS GPU and KAITO incidents using profile-aware, read-only evidence. WHEN: 'Insufficient nvidia.com/gpu', GPU pod Pending, model-load OOM, DCGM/VRAM, KAITO Workspace not ready, or GPU autoscaling. DO NOT USE FOR: setup (airunway-aks-setup), non-GPU incidents (aks-troubleshooting), standalone VM quota (azure-quotas), or generic cost (cost-analysis or cost-optimization from the optional azure-cost plugin).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize Kubernetes costs through resource right-sizing, unused resource detection, and cluster efficiency analysis. Use for cost optimization, resource analysis, and capacity planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the right LLM for LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS — issue-spotting, rule application, case/statute analysis, memos, and multi-step agentic research. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (Vals AI LegalBench across 124 models; Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark for agentic work). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model for legal research / case analysis / a memo", "best AI for legal reasoning", "route this research task", or is starting legal analysis without a fixed model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational billing execution for legal matters. Monthly bill prep and billing instructions, LC invoice review and disbursement treatment, client billing query responses, cashflow modelling (LC payment obligations vs client receipts), and leverage and burn analysis (staffing mix, predicted total cost, margin trajectory). Trigger on: 'prepare the bill', 'billing instruction', 'end of month billing', 'LC invoice', 'local counsel invoice', 'pass through as disbursement', 'client querying the invoice', 'billing dispute', 'cashflow gap', 'when will we get paid', 'LC payment due', 'leverage analysis', 'staffing mix', 'predicted total cost', 'burn rate by grade', 'are we on track', 'what will this matter cost'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Amazon profit analysis and revenue optimization. Revenue waterfall analysis, hidden fee identification, ACoS impact assessment, return cost calculation, and profitability optimization strategies. Use when the user asks about Amazon profit analysis, profitability calculation, fee analysis, margin optimization, or revenue breakdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amazon FBA and FBM shipping cost calculator and fulfillment optimization. Dimensional weight analysis, storage fee calculation, removal cost estimation, and fulfillment method comparison. Use when the user asks about Amazon shipping costs, FBA fees, fulfillment costs, storage fees, or shipping calculations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: FFP IGCE, firm-fixed-price estimate, FFP cost model, proposed FFP rate validation, wrap-rate analysis, Agency BPA rate comparison, price-reasonableness memo, or fair-and-reasonable analysis. Build auditable Firm-Fixed-Price federal estimates using BLS OEWS wages, layered fringe/overhead/G&A/profit, GSA CALC+ positioning, and GSA Per Diem travel. Use for FFP-by-period, FFP-by-deliverable, SOW/PWS decomposition, implied-multiplier analysis, and fixed-price scenario comparisons. Do NOT use for Labor Hour, T&M, or cost-reimbursement IGCEs (use IGCE Builder LH/T&M or IGCE Builder CR). Do NOT use for grant budgets. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize cloud costs through resource rightsizing, tagging strategies, reserved instances, and spending analysis. Use when reducing cloud expenses, analyzing infrastructure costs, or implementing cost governance policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Trigger.dev tasks, schedules, and runs for cost optimization opportunities. Use when asked to reduce spend, optimize costs, audit usage, right-size machines, or review task efficiency. Combines static source analysis with live run analysis via the Trigger.dev MCP tools (list_runs, get_run_details, get_current_worker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative cost measurement for technical research — token injection costs, payload sizes, context window consumption, and file-level counts from actual repo files. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs the cost dimension of adding or changing something: how many tokens will it inject, how big are the artifacts, what is the context window impact? This is NOT blast-radius analysis (which files break) — it covers size, tokens, and performance cost only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Ascend NPU collective communication profiling data with a DB-first workflow. Use when the user provides `cluster_analysis_output/cluster_analysis.db`, rank-level `analysis.db`, rank-level `ascend_pytorch_profiler_{rank_id}.db`, together with `profiler_info.json`, and asks about HCCL or hcom communication cost, collective communication TOP ops, wait time, slow rank/straggler, Notify Wait, bandwidth, retry, relay, SDMA/RDMA/HCCS links, communication matrix, or Ascend communication fault patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze defense program budgets and acquisition costs — earned value management (EVM/CPI/SPI), should-cost modeling, PPBE process alignment, cost estimation per GAO guidelines, Nunn-McCurdy breach risk, FYDP profiles, and learning curve analysis. Audit DoD 5000 acquisition software, program cost databases, and budget justification systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes Google Cloud BigQuery slot consumption, query costs, and execution bottlenecks using INFORMATION_SCHEMA. Use when diagnosing slow BigQuery queries, slot starvation, high on-demand query costs, unpartitioned table scans, or join performance issues. Don't use for generic BigQuery administration (use bigquery-basics), BigQuery ML (use bigquery-ai-ml), or DataFrame operations (use bigquery-bigframes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and eliminate the GraphQL N+1 resolver explosion using Facebook DataLoader's per-request batching, plus the second-order defenses (persisted queries, depth limits, cost analysis). Use when a GraphQL query that returns N items in a list triggers N+1 database round trips, when designing nested resolvers that load associations, when a list query times out under load, or when you need to budget query cost before resolvers run. NOT for REST-style endpoint design (use api-versioning-strategy), generic database query optimization (use database-query-optimizer), or schema design (use graphql-server-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profiles DAG execution performance including latency, token usage, cost, and resource consumption. Identifies bottlenecks and optimization opportunities. Activate on 'performance profile', 'execution metrics', 'latency analysis', 'token usage', 'cost analysis'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize cloud costs through resource rightsizing, tagging strategies, reserved instances, and spending analysis. Use when reducing cloud expenses, analyzing infrastructure costs, or implementing cost governance policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profiles DAG execution performance including latency, token usage, cost, and resource consumption. Identifies bottlenecks and optimization opportunities. Activate on 'performance profile', 'execution metrics', 'latency analysis', 'token usage', 'cost analysis'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive AWS cost analysis and optimization recommendations using AWS CLI and Cost Explorer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-breach impact analysis: inventories sensitive data (PII, PHI, PCI-DSS, credentials), traces data flows, scores exposure vectors, and produces a regulatory blast radius report with fine ranges sourced verbatim from GDPR Art. 83, CCPA § 1798.155(a), and HIPAA 45 CFR § 160.404. Cost benchmarks from IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report (annually updated). All citations in references/SOURCES.md for verification. Use when asked: "assess breach impact", "what data could be exposed", "calculate blast radius", "data exposure analysis", "how bad would a breach be", "quantify data risk", "sensitive data inventory", "data flow security audit", "pre-breach assessment", "worst-case breach scenario", "breach readiness", "data risk report", "/data-breach-blast-radius". For any stack handling user data, health records, or financial information. Output labels law-sourced figures (exact) vs heuristic estimates (planning only). Does not replace legal counsel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug live Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) incidents with a read-only, evidence-first investigation. WHEN: pod crashes or Pending, CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, ImagePullBackOff, node NotReady, DNS or ingress failure, connectivity timeout, network policy, SNAT exhaustion, node-pool scaling blocked by QuotaExceeded or InsufficientVCPUQuota, upgrade stuck, spot or zone disruption, a bare VMExtensionProvisioningError or AllocationFailed wrapper, an uncataloged capacity symptom, or 'investigate my AKS cluster'. DO NOT USE FOR: packet capture (use aks-network-capture); GPU or model-serving issues (use aks-gpu-inference); cluster creation or provisioning (use azure-kubernetes); cost (use cost-analysis from the optional azure-cost plugin); pod rightsizing (use azure-kubernetes); a fully qualified documented AKS signature with every required nested qualifier (use aks-known-issues); standalone failures on non-AKS Azure resources (use azure-diagnostics). Unqualified errors and open-ended incidents stay here only for AKS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。