「defense」の検索結果

Detect process injection techniques (T1055) - including DLL injection, process hollowing, and APC injection - by analyzing Sysmon Event IDs 1, 7, 8, 10, and 25 for cross-process memory operations, remote thread creation, and anomalous DLL loads. Use when hunting defense-evasion activity that hides code inside legitimate processes, investigating an EDR alert on suspicious cross-process access, or validating Sysmon coverage for injection detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploys Llama Guard 3 safety classification, NeMo Guardrails programmable dialogue rails, and LLM Guard input/output scanner pipelines as complementary runtime defenses that inspect and constrain LLM prompts and responses. Use when adding a production runtime safety layer to an LLM, RAG, or agent application to block jailbreaks, prompt injection (OWASP LLM01), toxic content, or sensitive-data leakage before it reaches or leaves the model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain framework to identify which phases an adversary has completed, where defenses succeeded or failed, and what controls would have interrupted the attack at earlier phases. Use when conducting post-incident analysis, building prevention-focused security controls, or mapping detection gaps to kill chain phases. Activates for requests involving kill chain analysis, intrusion kill chain, attack phase mapping, or Lockheed Martin kill chain framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate a 4-agent cyber defense pipeline to analyze log files for threats. Use when investigating security logs, detecting anomalies in access patterns, classifying breach severity, or generating incident reports from nginx/auth/syslog files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Anthropic Claude API security best practices for key management, input validation, and prompt injection defense. Use when securing API keys, validating user inputs before sending to Claude, or implementing content safety guardrails. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic security", "claude api key security", "secure anthropic", "prompt injection defense".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert ITAR compliance advisor for US defense contractors, exporters, and manufacturers. Use this skill for any question about 22 CFR Parts 120-130, the United States Munitions List (USML), DDTC registration, export license applications (DSP-5/73/94), Technical Assistance Agreements (TAA), Manufacturing License Agreements (MLA), brokering regulations (Part 129), deemed export rules for foreign nationals, technology control plans, voluntary disclosures, violation mitigation, jurisdiction determination (ITAR vs EAR), or US Munitions List category scoping. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ITAR or US defense export control question should use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert ITAR compliance advisor for US defense contractors, exporters, and manufacturers. Use this skill for any question about 22 CFR Parts 120-130, the United States Munitions List (USML), DDTC registration, export license applications (DSP-5/73/94), Technical Assistance Agreements (TAA), Manufacturing License Agreements (MLA), brokering regulations (Part 129), deemed export rules for foreign nationals, technology control plans, voluntary disclosures, violation mitigation, jurisdiction determination (ITAR vs EAR), or US Munitions List category scoping. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ITAR or US defense export control question should use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inverts burden of proof for code additions. Use when reviewing PRs, planning refactors, or running unbloat to challenge every addition's necessity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate high-quality academic Beamer slides from a thesis/paper (PDF, Word, or LaTeX source). Compatible with Claude Code and Codex. Supports thesis defense, proposal presentations, and conference talks. Built-in layout library with 13 professional page types, 5 color schemes, and interactive editing loop. Use when: (1) User asks to create thesis defense slides/PPT, (2) User wants to generate academic presentation from a paper, (3) User mentions beamer, 答辩PPT, 学术报告, 开题PPT, 论文幻灯片, or academic slides, (4) User has a PDF/docx/tex thesis and wants presentation output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI Manipulation Defense System implementation with Midstream, AgentDB, and lean-agentic

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run structured prompt-injection attack and defense experiments against an LLM-integrated app before production by measuring attack success and testing detection or recovery pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze defense maintenance and readiness systems — MRO optimization, mission capable rate tracking, reliability-centered maintenance (RCM), condition-based maintenance (CBM+), depot-level analytics, configuration management, and workforce planning. Audit weapon system sustainment software per MIL-STD-3034, AR 750-1, and DoD CBM+ frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze defense supply chain systems — DFARS compliance assessment, CMMC cybersecurity readiness, sole-source and DMSMS risk identification, counterfeit parts prevention per SAE AS6171, ITAR export control verification, and supplier tier mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze defense program budgets and acquisition costs — earned value management (EVM/CPI/SPI), should-cost modeling, PPBE process alignment, cost estimation per GAO guidelines, Nunn-McCurdy breach risk, FYDP profiles, and learning curve analysis. Audit DoD 5000 acquisition software, program cost databases, and budget justification systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a defendant's Answer with Invalidity Contentions responding to a U.S. patent infringement complaint. Covers FRCP 8(b) admissions/denials, affirmative defenses, and PLR 3-3 invalidity contentions with claim charts under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 102, 103, 112. Use when representing a defendant in the pleadings phase of federal patent litigation who must respond to an infringement suit and assert prior art, anticipation, obviousness, or § 112 defenses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure skill template with prompt injection defenses. Copy this template when creating new skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find Amazon Ads search terms ready for exact-match harvesting from auto, broad, phrase, or other discovery campaigns. Use when Codex needs standalone or Rocketcart MCP-aware search-term harvesting: classify terms by harvest readiness, resolve live IDs, choose safe destination campaigns/ad groups, preflight duplicates/current negatives/destination feasibility, decide whether source negatives are justified, execute only explicitly approved rows, and read back/monitor Sponsored Products or Sponsored Brands actions without unsafe negatives, duplicate routing, stale approvals, brand-defense cuts, own-ASIN-defense cuts, launch/rank mistakes, or low-sample overfitting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect DLL side-loading attacks where adversaries place malicious DLLs alongside legitimate applications to hijack execution flow for defense evasion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy Llama Guard, NeMo Guardrails, and LLM Guard input/output scanners as runtime defenses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain framework to identify which phases an adversary has completed, where defenses succeeded or failed, and what controls would have interrupted the attack at earlier phases. Use when conducting post-incident analysis, building prevention-focused security controls, or mapping detection gaps to kill chain phases. Activates for requests involving kill chain analysis, intrusion kill chain, attack phase mapping, or Lockheed Martin kill chain framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the DoD Risk, Issue, and Opportunity (RIO) Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs (OUSD R&E, Sep 2023 incl. Change 2.2). Use for the defense-acquisition mechanics of program risk management: the RIO definitions (risk/issue/opportunity), the five-step risk process (plan-identify-analyze-mitigate-monitor), 1-5 likelihood/consequence scoring and the 5x5 risk matrix, the four mitigation options (accept/avoid/transfer/control), burn-down plans, issue management (probability=1), opportunity management toward should-cost, cross-program/interface risk, tailoring RIO to the six AAF acquisition pathways (UCA/MTA/MCA/Software/DBS/Services), specialized methods (RMF, MBCRA/Cyber Table Top, Agile metrics, FMECA, ITRA/DTRAM), and institutionalizing RIO via the PRMP, boards (RMB/JRMB/ROMB/RWG), tools, tiered roles, and WBS/IMP/IMS/EVM/TPM integration. This is the DoD-acquisition complement to nasa-risk (general CRM/RIDM theory) and dau-se-guidebook (the SE process frame). Does NOT teach general risk theory from scratch, and defers specialized risk regimes (system safety/ESOH, HSI, detailed cyber/RMF, spectrum) to their own DoD instructions and the relevant packs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate at every layer data passes through to make bugs impossible

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。