122 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Runs environment, health and safety on an operating site — hazard controls in order of effectiveness, incident recording and reporting obligations, and safety measurement that does not reward silence. Use this to build or audit a safety program, decide what controls a hazard actually needs, work out whether an injury is recordable or reportable, investigate an incident, or fix safety metrics that have stopped producing reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and improve Claude Code commands, skills, and agents. Use when testing prompt effectiveness, validating context engineering choices, or measuring improvement quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map identified threats to appropriate security controls and mitigations. Use when prioritizing security investments, creating remediation plans, or validating control effectiveness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run evaluations on Agent Skills to measure their effectiveness. USE FOR: "run skill evals", "evaluate my skill", "test skill quality", "check skill triggers", "skill compliance check", "measure skill performance", "run evals on [skill-name]", "grade skill execution". DO NOT USE FOR: writing skills (use skill-authoring), improving frontmatter (use sensei), or general testing unrelated to skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pipeline analysis composite. Pulls deal/meeting data from any CRM or tracking system, analyzes the pipeline over a user-defined period (weekly, fortnightly, monthly, quarterly), and produces both an executive summary and a detailed diagnostic report. Covers volume, qualification rates, source effectiveness, stage velocity, stuck deals, and actionable recommendations. Tool-agnostic — works with any CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Close, Supabase, CSV).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Measure ad effectiveness with privacy-preserving attribution using AdAttributionKit. Use when registering ad impressions, handling attribution postbacks, updating conversion values, implementing re-engagement attribution, configuring publisher or advertiser apps, or replacing SKAdNetwork with AdAttributionKit for ad measurement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit model delegation and subagent effectiveness for a session — which models handled which subagent types, per-type success rates and average durations, and wasted delegations (heavy models on trivial work or types that consistently fail) — using the Agent Monitor workflow intelligence API. Use when reviewing how a session delegated work across models and subagents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarize a sprint's worth of Claude Code activity — sessions grouped by project (cwd), per-model cost breakdown, token efficiency (cache hit rate, compaction baselines), subagent effectiveness from workflow API, velocity metrics (turn_count, turn_duration_ms), and tool diversity across the sprint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze workflow patterns using the Agent Monitor's workflow intelligence API — orchestration DAGs, tool flow transitions, subagent effectiveness, model delegation patterns, error propagation by depth, concurrency lanes, compaction impact, and agent co-occurrence. Produces prioritized optimization recommendations with quantified impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze prompt-cache effectiveness for Claude Code usage from the Agent Monitor dashboard — cache hit rate (total_cache_read / (total_cache_read + total_input)), cache_write vs cache_read reuse, cache-read vs cache-write spend, and the sessions with the poorest reuse. Pulls token totals from /api/analytics, per-session detail from /api/sessions, and dollar splits from /api/pricing/cost. Use when diagnosing cache spend or deciding whether prompt caching is paying off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculate a productivity score using actual Agent Monitor metrics — session completion rates, cache efficiency (cache_read vs input), compaction pressure (baseline tokens), turn velocity (turn_count / total_turn_duration_ms), tool success ratio (PreToolUse vs PostToolUse), and the workflow intelligence API's complexity and effectiveness scores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare two sessions side-by-side using Agent Monitor data — per-model token usage (input/output/cache_read/cache_write + compaction baselines), pricing engine cost breakdowns, workflow intelligence (complexity scores, tool flow transitions, subagent effectiveness), session metadata (thinking_blocks, turn_count, turn_duration_ms, usage_extras), and full event timelines with all 10+ event types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Actionable feedback on the quality, usage, and effectiveness of Power BI reports. Automatically invoke when the user asks to "review a report", "audit a report", "report usage analysis", "report health check", "find unused reports", "check if a report is being used", "assess report performance", "evaluate report quality".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CAPA system management for medical device QMS, covering root cause analysis, corrective action planning, and effectiveness verification. Use for CAPA investigations, 5-Why and fishbone analysis, and corrective action tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Landing page and marketing page conversion rate optimization covering value proposition clarity, headline effectiveness, CTA hierarchy, visual flow, social proof placement, objection handling, and structured A/B testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze skill effectiveness across sessions. Computes per-skill metrics (action rate, friction, outcomes), identifies degrading skills, and generates improvement recommendations. Requires session-scan data in metrics.jsonl.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates anonymization as a retention alternative under GDPR Recital 26, applying the WP29 Opinion 05/2014 techniques including randomization and generalization. Validates anonymization effectiveness using k-anonymity, l-diversity, and t-closeness metrics. Activate for anonymization, de-identification, k-anonymity, retention alternative queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review whether a repository's coding-agent harness can reliably carry work from intent through controlled execution, verification, delivery, and learning. Use when asked to assess agent readiness, repeated agent failures, Rules/Skills/Hooks/Memory effectiveness, missing validation or recovery loops, or whether a harness repair improved later outcomes. Do not use for code-only audits, AGENTS-only audits, individual skill reliability reviews, or executing the task itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize test suites using mutation testing to maximize mutation kill rate with minimal tests. Use when you need to reduce test suite size while maintaining quality, identify redundant tests, improve mutation coverage, or validate test effectiveness. The skill analyzes test coverage, execution intervals, and redundancy using mutation operators, selects or generates a minimal subset of tests that maximizes mutation kill rate, and outputs an optimized test suite with detailed reports showing killed and surviving mutants. Supports multiple programming languages and mutation testing frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes surviving mutants from mutation testing to identify why tests failed to detect them. Takes repository code, test suite, and mutation testing results as input. Identifies root causes including insufficient coverage, equivalent mutants, weak assertions, and missed edge cases. Automatically generates actionable test improvements and new test cases. Use when analyzing mutation testing results, improving test suite effectiveness, investigating low mutation scores, generating tests to kill surviving mutants, or enhancing test quality based on mutation analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarizes the complete lifecycle of a bug across code versions, tracking its introduction, detection, fixing attempts, and regression history. Use when users need to: (1) Understand how a bug evolved over time, (2) Trace when and how a bug was introduced, (3) Analyze fix attempts and their effectiveness, (4) Identify regression patterns, (5) Generate bug lifecycle reports for documentation or post-mortems. Takes a repository, bug identifier, and version history as input.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate design effectiveness from a UX perspective. Assesses visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, and overall design quality with actionable feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect test smells, overmocking, flaky tests, and coverage issues. Analyze test effectiveness, maintainability, and reliability. Use when reviewing tests or improving test quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate test effectiveness with mutation testing using Stryker (TypeScript/JavaScript with Vitest or bun test via @hughescr/stryker-bun-runner) and mutmut (Python). Find weak tests that pass despite code mutations. Use to improve test quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。