「evidence-based」の検索結果

Run an evidence-based production-readiness review for an Attio integration across identity, scopes, data ownership, retries, webhooks, observability, rollback, and support. Use when preparing to enable production Attio traffic. Trigger with "Attio production checklist", "Attio go-live", or "review Attio release".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit websites and landing pages for conversion issues and design evidence-based A/B tests. Use when the user mentions "landing page isnt converting", "conversion rate", "A/B test", "why visitors leave", "objection handling", "bounce rate", "conversion funnel", "increase signups", or "people add to cart but dont buy". Also trigger when diagnosing why signups are low, designing experiment hypotheses, or auditing checkout flows for friction points. Covers funnel mapping, persuasion assets, and objection/counter-objection frameworks. For overall marketing strategy, see one-page-marketing. For usability issues, see ux-heuristics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial verification of finished work. Treats any "done" as a set of claims, then re-runs the claimed verifications, diffs what actually changed, detects weakened tests and false completion claims, and delivers an evidence-based verdict (VERIFIED / VERIFIED WITH CAVEATS / REFUTED). Use after any agent or model claims work is complete - "/fable-judge", "judge this work", "verify what it did", "did that actually work?". Also runs the fable-method trap suite against a skill or model via "/fable-judge suite TARGET".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates a systematic review and meta-analysis workflow following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, from protocol development through multi-database search, screening, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Use when conducting evidence-based reviews, meta-analyses, or scoping revi...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). ...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based medical knowledge and research mentor grounded in the Bian Que tradition. Covers clinical reasoning, diagnostic thinking (望闻问切), pharmacology, pathology, differential diagnosis, medical literature appraisal, and the philosophy of early intervention. Trigger whenever users ask about medicine, clinical science, drugs, disease mechanisms, diagnosis, lab interpretation, treatment comparison, or health sciences. Even without explicit research framing, trigger on any topic touching disease, therapeutics, or clinical decision-making. Part of the AIPOCH Medical Research Skill Hub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating Muddy Waters-style forensic short research: fraud, channel checks, related-party structures, cash verification, governance failure, and evidence-based short theses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating David Einhorn-style forensic shorts and longs: accounting red flags, governance problems, capital allocation failures, and evidence-based short theses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teaches evidence-based analysis of transaction logs and traces. Use when reconstructing transaction behavior from tables, TSV/CSV files, timestamps, counters, object histories, validation records, abort records, retries, partial logs, or when producing classified transaction outputs from trace evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute tasks through competitive multi-agent generation, meta-judge evaluation specification, multi-judge evaluation, and evidence-based synthesis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Enforce evidence-based completion claims — require fresh command output before reporting success. Use when completing any task, fixing a bug, finishing a phase, running tests, building, deploying, or making any "it works" claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or resume an evidence-based RPI implementation plan with an optional independent critique. Use when a task needs an implementation plan or an existing plan needs revision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews skill quality with evidence-based design rubrics and read-only batch inventories. Use for self-review, external skill or repository audits, and authorized auto-PR improvements. Separates design quality from measured task benefit and host compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transforms raw meeting transcripts into structured, evidence-based meeting minutes — merges multiple versions without losing content, reviews existing minutes against the transcript for missing items, and identifies anonymous speakers (Speaker 1/2/3, 发言人1). Triggers on 会议纪要, 会议记录, 整理纪要, 妙记转纪要, "write meeting minutes", "merge these minutes". Not for fixing ASR/STT errors first (use transcript-fixer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clones and audits competitor repositories into evidence-based intelligence with file:line citations. Use to track competitors, add a competitor repo, review competitor code, compare capabilities, build a competitor landscape, or check for code updates: 竞品分析 / 竞品 / competitor scan / analyze competitor / compare with X / latest competitor code. Not for market research without code (use deep-research).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a 6-dimension evidence-based health audit of this skills marketplace repo — code safety, docs/SSOT, security/PII, PR/issue triage, manifest integrity — via a parallel workflow, then verifies findings by priority. Use for 全面体检 / 检查仓库状态 / 审计一下仓库, a pre-release sweep, or "is this repo OK" even without saying "workflow". Not for building marketplace.json (use marketplace-dev) or cache drift (use skill-governance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a fast, honest competitive scan — the dimension table built from public evidence (sites, docs, pricing pages, changelogs, reviews), the claims-vs-observed discipline, and the so-what synthesis that ends in moves, not a landscape mural. Use when asked what are competitors doing, quick scan of these three rivals, how does our pricing/feature set compare, or prep the competitive slide honestly. Produces the evidence-based comparison table, the marketing-vs-reality flags, the so-what synthesis, and the staleness date.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn interview notes into a structured candidate scorecard and hire recommendation. Use when asked to write an interview scorecard, a candidate evaluation, an interview debrief, or to summarize feedback into a hire/no-hire call. Produces a per-competency assessment with evidence and ratings, an overall recommendation with confidence, and the open questions for the next round — evidence-based, bias-aware, and decision-ready.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full video production sequence with script review, actual ingredient choices, controlled generation, editing, evidence-based quality review, polish, captions and delivery. A host binding supplies project storage, authentic approvals, provider access and billing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma, Schwede & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2021 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profile, diagnose, and remediate SwiftUI runtime performance using code review, Instruments, and repeatable measurements. Use when a SwiftUI screen renders slowly, scrolling or animations hitch, view bodies update excessively, list identity churns, layout work spikes, or broad Observation dependencies raise CPU cost. Covers evidence-based triage, SwiftUI Instruments lanes, lazy-container guardrails, state lifetime, and before/after verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a high-quality deep-reading note for a single paper and write it into an Obsidian-style vault. Use when the user gives a paper title, DOI, URL, arXiv ID, Zotero item, or local PDF and wants a polished Markdown note with strong structure, evidence-based analysis, and figure placeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an evidence-based competitive pricing strategy for ecommerce products. Use when a seller asks how to position a price against competitors, set regular and promotional prices, protect contribution margin, design bundles or price tiers, respond to competitor moves, or coordinate prices across Amazon, Shopify, TikTok Shop, Walmart, eBay, or other channels. Do not use for automated repricing implementation or claims of a mathematically proven optimal price without sufficient data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。