490 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. A secondary Codex agent evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track ML experiments, manage model registry with versioning, deploy models to production, and reproduce experiments with MLflow - framework-agnostic ML lifecycle platform
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design experiments and studies BEFORE data is collected — choosing a design, randomizing, blocking, and laying out treatment combinations so the results will actually be interpretable. Use whenever someone is planning a study, asks how to assign subjects/samples to groups, mentions randomization, blocking, stratification, controls, factorial or fractional-factorial designs, design of experiments (DOE), screening many factors, response-surface optimization, crossover or repeated-measures or split-plot designs, cluster/group randomization, Latin squares, plate layouts, batch/run-order effects, replication vs. pseudoreplication, or sequential/adaptive/group-sequential designs. Trigger this even for informal phrasings like "how should I set up this experiment", "how do I avoid confounding", "what's the best way to test these 6 factors", or "assign these mice to conditions". For computing the sample size or power once the design is chosen, use statistical-power; for analyzing data already collected, use statistical-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design guide RNAs for CRISPR-Cas9/Cas12a experiments using CRISPRscan and local scoring algorithms. Score guides for on-target activity using Rule Set 2 and Azimuth models. Use when designing sgRNAs for gene knockout, activation, or repression experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for SPR and BLI binding characterization experiments. Use when: (1) Planning binding kinetics experiments, (2) Troubleshooting poor/no binding signal, (3) Interpreting kinetic data artifacts, (4) Choosing between SPR vs BLI platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stops defensive writing across the entire paper lifecycle — writing, revising, cutting, and organizing experiments. Treats the paper as a press conference, not a project summary, lab log, or self-audit: identify the single most publishable strength of the work and build the most favorable, complete, and persuasive narrative around it. Never present everything evenly, never volunteer weakness, never write an experiment diary, never attack the paper on the reviewer's behalf. Triggers: polish my paper, revise manuscript, write abstract, write introduction, write conclusion, shorten paper, rebuttal, respond to reviewers, organize experiments, defensive writing, AI-flavored academic writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply lean thinking to UX: hypothesis-driven design, collaborative sketching, and rapid experiments instead of heavy deliverables. Use when the user mentions "Lean UX", "design hypothesis", "outcome over output", "design studio method", "assumption mapping", "lightweight research", "too much design documentation", or "get the team designing together". Also trigger when reducing design-documentation overhead, getting cross-functional teams to co-design, or running fast usability experiments. Covers hypothesis statements, MVPs for UX, and cross-functional collaboration. For Build-Measure-Learn, see lean-startup. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add file-based observability, tracing, and run analysis to LLM/agent experiments — per-turn transcripts, tool calls and results, reasoning traces, token/cost accounting, per-episode artifacts, plus terminal viewers and a run-comparison report. Platform-agnostic: one small adapter covers OpenAI, Gemini/Vertex, Anthropic, LiteLLM, Tinker, vLLM, or any custom inference stack, and the same tooling then works unchanged. Use this skill whenever the user wants observability, tracing, logging, or run tracking for model experiments; asks why an agent failed a task or wants to replay/debug/diff an episode; wants to compare models, arms, or ablations; wants to instrument a new folder, repo, or platform ("add observability here", "do the same for Tinker/Gemini/OpenAI"); wants to import or tie in existing experiment results so old runs show up alongside new ones; or wants eval runner scripts where many models share one protocol. Reach for this even when they only say "log what the model is doing", "I can't tell what happened in this run", or "set up traces for this experiment".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users design, execute, and analyze product experiments to validate hypotheses and measure true incremental impact while avoiding common statistical pitfalls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing ACM CCS experiments, attack demonstrations, adaptive-attack defense evaluations, security measurements, baselines, overhead and cost reporting, ablations, and claim-to-evidence fit, with emphasis on evidence that survives an adversarial program committee rather than leaderboard wins.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing the experiments of an ACM MM (ACM Multimedia) paper — matched baselines per modality, ablations that isolate the cross-modal fusion, user studies or QoE measurement where the claim is subjective, dataset and media licensing, and honest compute reporting, so evidence supports a multimedia claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing experiments for an ACL paper, covering tuned LLM baselines, multi-dataset and multilingual evaluation, statistical significance and variance, human evaluation with agreement reporting, contamination and prompt-sensitivity controls, ablations, and error-analysis expectations in NLP reviewing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing AAMAS supplementary material - proofs, extended game and mechanism definitions, extra multiagent experiments, opponent-set details, and the anonymized artifact zip - under the size cap, anonymity, and reviewer-discretion limits, including how to split a game-theory-plus-experiments paper across the 8-page body and the supplement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, modify, or delete experiments in Experiment Manager with live UI sync. TRIGGER when: user asks to create an experiment from code/script, wants to sweep parameters, asks to add/delete/edit experiments, or wants parameter changes reflected in the UI. Combines experiment creation (from code analysis) with frontend UI synchronization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and run statistically rigorous A/B tests and experiments. Use when planning experiments, calculating sample sizes, designing test variants, selecting metrics, analyzing results, or when someone says "let's test that."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
mirTarRnaSeq R package can be used for interactive mRNA miRNA sequencing statistical analysis. This package utilizes expression or differential expression mRNA and miRNA sequencing results and performs interactive correlation and various GLMs (Regular GLM, Multivariate GLM, and Interaction GLMs ) analysis between mRNA and miRNA expriments. These experiments can be time point experiments, and or condition expriments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step 4 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). ONE single multimodal LLM call that drafts the remaining paper sections (Abstract, Methodology, Experiments, Conclusion), extracts numeric values from experimental_log.md into LaTeX booktabs tables, splices the generated figures from Step 2, and merges everything into the template that already contains Intro + Related Work from Step 3. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 4 or when the user asks to "write the methodology and experiments sections" or "fill in the rest of the paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use F# Interactive (`dotnet fsi`) for .NET exploration, scriptable experiments, package-backed .fsx workflows, quick data transforms, and reproducible command-line probes. USE FOR: .fsx scripts, F# REPL work, #r nuget references, #load composition, interactive type exploration, and small strongly typed experiments before moving code into a project. DO NOT USE FOR: production application code that needs compiled project structure; C# scripting; long-lived automation better expressed as a normal CLI, test, or build target. INVOKES: run dotnet fsi, edit .fsx scripts, load project or source files, and validate snippets against the target SDK.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design experiments, plan ablation studies, structure baselines, or create incremental evaluation strategies. Triggers on phrases like "design ablation", "plan experiment", "what experiments should I run", "baseline comparison", or "experiment matrix".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, and strengthen experimental validation for IEEE manuscripts using routed claim-evidence checks. Use when planning experiments, selecting baselines, designing ablations, choosing metrics, checking fairness, adding robustness tests, explaining results, analyzing complexity, building claim-to-evidence matrices, or responding to reviewer concerns about insufficient experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs experiments to minimize and account for batch effects using balanced layouts and blocking strategies. Use when planning multi-batch experiments, assigning samples to sequencing lanes, or designing studies where technical variation could confound biological signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for SPR and BLI binding characterization experiments. Use when: (1) Planning binding kinetics experiments, (2) Troubleshooting poor/no binding signal, (3) Interpreting kinetic data artifacts, (4) Choosing between SPR vs BLI platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。