「high-risk」の検索結果

Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus, Reg. (EU) 2026/1744, in force July 27, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of August 2026. GPAI enforcement powers active since August 2, 2026.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess, report, and manage serious incidents involving high-risk AI systems under Article 73 EU AI Act. Covers incident qualification, deadline buckets (2/10/15 days), authority notification, deployer duties (Art. 26(5)), cross-regulation mapping (GDPR/NIS2/MDR), corrective measures, and DACH-specific routing. Use when asked to evaluate whether an AI incident is reportable, draft an Article 73 notification, identify the right authority, or build an AI incident response process.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) guidance under Article 35 GDPR, EDPB Guidelines WP 248 rev.01, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI), and national SA blacklists/whitelists. Triggers: "DPIA", "DSFA", "Datenschutz-Folgenabschätzung", "impact assessment", "Art. 35", "do I need a DPIA", descriptions of new high-risk processing (profiling, AI, biometrics, large-scale monitoring, special category data), Art. 36 prior consultation questions, national blacklist/whitelist queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is required under Article 27 EU AI Act, and structure or draft that assessment for a specific high-risk AI deployment. Covers deployer scope gating (public bodies and private entities providing public services), affected group mapping, Charter rights analysis, proportionality, safeguards evaluation, residual risk, DPIA/FRIA cross-referencing under the amended Article 27(4), the unconditional notification duty under Article 27(3), and DACH-specific considerations. Use when asked about FRIA obligations, Article 27 scope, fundamental rights and AI, or deployer assessment duties.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus adopted June 29, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of July 2026. GPAI enforcement powers activate August 2, 2026.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `Stryker.NET` mutation testing tool for .NET. Use when a repo needs to measure whether tests actually catch faults, especially in critical libraries or domains. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants Stryker.NET; mutation testing is needed for high-risk code. DO NOT USE FOR: every PR path by default in a large repo; simple coverage collection. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate tactical collar strategy reports for protecting PMCC positions through earnings or high-risk events. Requires TWS or IB Gateway running locally.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the GDPR Article 36 prior consultation process with supervisory authorities when a DPIA indicates high residual risk. Covers timeline requirements, documentation, and outcome handling. Activate when DPIA residual risk remains high or when preparing regulatory submissions. Keywords: prior consultation, Article 36, DPIA, high risk, supervisory authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages direct communication to affected data subjects following a personal data breach under GDPR Article 34 when the breach is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms. Covers the high risk threshold, required notification content per Art. 34(2), exemptions under Art. 34(3), and breach notification letter templates for five scenarios. Keywords: data subject notification, Article 34, high risk, breach communication, GDPR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a preliminary, evidence-based EU AI Act readiness assessment across AI-system inventory, territorial scope, operator roles, prohibited-practice screening, risk classification, transparency, high-risk controls, general-purpose AI obligations, governance, and implementation milestones. Use when an organization needs to triage an AI use case, vendor, model, product, or portfolio for Regulation (EU) 2024/1689; prepare an AI inventory, gap register, implementation roadmap, or counsel briefing; assess provider, deployer, importer, distributor, product-manufacturer, authorised-representative, or GPAI-provider responsibilities; or re-check readiness after regulatory or product changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reasoning about deep tech commercialization, biomedical engineering, drug delivery, material design, or overcoming institutional skepticism. Robert Langer, MIT professor and pioneer of drug delivery systems, approaches problems through first-principles engineering, interdisciplinary convergence, and relentless perseverance against consensus. Trigger this skill whenever the user is evaluating high-risk/high-reward research, deciding between incremental vs. paradigm-shifting impact, spinning out academic discoveries into startups, or designing physical/biological systems from scratch. Apply his frameworks to navigate patenting, funding, and translating lab science into real-world impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a structured PRD for high-risk, cross-team, or multi-sprint initiatives before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze WeChat Mini Program platform constraints and evidence layers for an idea or existing repository, including source configuration, build output, WeChat DevTools loading, device behavior, permissions, privacy declarations, cloud or backend linkage, upload, trial, review, and production status. Use when users ask about WeChat-specific configuration, project roots, compile paths, capability permissions, privacy compliance, official platform rules, upload or release readiness, or why source and platform behavior differ. Performs read-only evidence classification by default, verifies time-sensitive or high-risk claims against current official WeChat sources, redacts identifiers and secrets, and never upgrades one evidence layer into another.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户需要识别保险理赔案件是否属于高风险案件、分析案件中有哪些重点风险信号、判断是否存在高赔付高争议高投诉高时效高复杂度或高欺诈风险、输出高风险案件预警报告或为理赔审核、复核、调查和管理提供重点案件筛查支持时使用本 skill。适用于分析保单信息、理赔申请信息、案件事实、医疗材料、事故材料、历史行为、处理记录、沟通备注、投诉工单、调查线索、风险规则、预警标签和历史风险库信息，并形成结构化风险等级、触发依据、待核实事项和处置建议。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git repository history to produce a codebase risk profile before code review. Probes repo size, runs 7 parallel git analysis pipelines (hotspots, bug magnets, bus factor, contributor momentum, firefighting frequency, newly added files), cross-references hotspots with bug magnets to identify high-risk files with primary owner annotation, and writes walkthrough/recon-report.md. Use before code review to prioritize reviewer attention, at the start of linear-walkthrough Phase 1 Discovery to weight file coverage, or when onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex must make a high-quality judgment on any complex problem, not only technical problems. Trigger when a question has high complexity, uncertainty, cost of being wrong, long-term impact, value tradeoffs, possible structural causes, or when the user asks for 全面思考, 深度理解, 系统性分析, 帮我想清楚, 从根上看, 这件事到底怎么看, 方法论, 复杂问题拆解, 系统方案, 架构判断, 策略判断, or 根因分析. Also trigger for project and engineering high-risk scenarios such as multi-module, multi-environment, multi-data-source, multi-state, financial truth, live trading, ledger, revenue, customer assets, order governance, broker interfaces, online availability, major solution selection, and system closure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when guidance behavior pressure cases or high-risk agent guidance contracts need deterministic validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test a design decision with premortem/backcast analysis, then produce a risk-calibrated recommendation that maps to ADR fields. Use when: (1) Multiple competing architecture options, (2) Irreversible or high-risk design choices, (3) /discuss identifies a complex trade-off

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps hunts and detections to MITRE ATT&CK for coverage analysis: tagging hypotheses with techniques, building a coverage matrix from completed hunts, and identifying high-risk gaps to prioritize next. Activates for requests to map hunts to ATT&CK, build a coverage heatmap, or find detection gaps by technique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smart code scanner that detects Spring Boot patterns and routes to appropriate skills. Use when editing Java or Kotlin files in Spring Boot projects, working with pom.xml/build.gradle containing spring-boot-starter, or when context suggests Spring Boot development. Detects annotations (@RestController, @Entity, @EnableWebSecurity, @SpringBootTest) to determine relevant skills and provides contextual guidance. Uses progressive automation - auto-invokes for low-risk patterns (web-api, data, DDD), confirms before loading high-risk skills (security, testing, verify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits, configures, and hardens workload-level security controls for Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) applications and namespaces. Covers running cluster security audits (`audit_cluster.sh`), configuring Workload Identity Federation (impersonation, KSA/GSA binding, and pod setup), enforcing Network Policies (default-deny and Dataplane V2 logging), isolating high-risk pods inside GKE Sandbox (`gVisor`), enforcing Pod Security Standards (`restricted` labeling), and mounting Secret Manager secrets via CSI (`SecretProviderClass`). Use when auditing cluster security posture, isolating namespaces, applying pod security standards, setting up Workload Identity, or configuring network policies and secret volume mounts. Don't use for cluster-wide control plane security, RBAC hardening, Binary Authorization, Shielded Nodes, or enabling platform-level GKE add-ons (use gke-platform-security instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop or review dygo PostgreSQL connectivity, schema planning, additive migration, prune, metadata persistence, Records, transactions, and schema snapshots. Use for framework database behavior and high-risk data lifecycle changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。