Figma REST API / Plugin API / Widget API / Code Connect / MCP Server リファレンス。 OAuth / Personal Access Token / Plan Access Token 認証、files, variables, webhooks, Dev Mode, Dev Resources, SCIM, activity-logs, library-analytics エンドポイント。 figma グローバルオブジェクト、node types (FrameNode, TextNode, ComponentNode 等)、 data types、figma.variables、figma.codegen、figma.ui。 useSyncedState, useSyncedMap, usePropertyMenu, AutoLayout, register。 Code Connect CLI / UI / React / SwiftUI / Compose / HTML / Storybook / custom parsers。 Figma MCP Server ツール・プロンプト・Code to Canvas・Write to Canvas。
「iab」の検索結果
1,718 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Extract and update the EcoSIM output-variable catalog from Fortran history-field registration calls such as hist_addfld1d and hist_addfld2d. Use only when explicitly asked to update, regenerate, refresh, or rebuild the list of EcoSIM output variables from HistDataType.F90 or related F90 source; do not invoke for ordinary EcoSIM output analysis unless the variable list itself must be updated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Viteを使う開発で、設定ファイル、環境変数、APIへの接続、プラグイン、ビルド出力を整え、開発サーバーや依存関係の不具合調査を支援するスキル。
- 環境変数と開発用API転送の設定
- 開発サーバーの遅さや更新不良の調査
- 本番用ファイルの最適化と動作確認
AIによる開発の成功条件を実装前に定義し、コード・ルール・モデル・人の評価で新機能と既存機能を確認しながら、複数回の試行から信頼性を記録するスキル。
- AI実装前に成功条件を決めたいとき
- プロンプトやエージェント変更後の回帰確認
- 複数回の試行で信頼性を測りたいとき
Pythonの実行を途中で止め、変数や処理の流れを調べて不具合の原因を探ります。pdbとdebugpyを使い分け、失敗したテストや稼働中のプロセスも調査します。
- 失敗したテストの変数を調べたいとき
- 関数内のコレクションの変化を追う
- 例外発生地点の変数の確認
Generates guidance for reliability, resilience, availability, redundancy, fault-tolerance, and disaster recovery (DR) for Google Cloud workloads based on the design principles and recommendations in the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework. Use when the user asks to evaluate, design, or improve the reliability, resilience, availability, or disaster recovery capabilities of Google Cloud workloads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improves GKE workload reliability, using PDBs, health probes, and topology spread constraints. Use when configuring GKE workload reliability, setting up PDBs, or configuring GKE health probes (liveness, readiness, startup). Don't use for generating K8s YAML manifests (use gke-manifest-generation) or disaster recovery and cluster backups (use gke-backup-dr).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or update a professional-grade design system in Figma from a codebase. Use when the user wants to create variables/tokens, build component libraries, create individual components with proper variant sets and variable bindings, set up theming (light/dark modes), document foundations, or reconcile gaps between code and Figma. Also use when the user asks to create or generate any component in Figma — even a single one — since components require proper variable foundations, variant states, and design token bindings to be production-quality. This skill teaches WHAT to build and in WHAT ORDER — it complements the `figma-use` skill which teaches HOW to call the Plugin API. Both skills should be loaded together.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build or update a professional-grade design system in Figma from a codebase. Use when the user wants to create variables/tokens, build component libraries, create individual components with proper variant sets and variable bindings, set up theming (light/dark modes), document foundations, or reconcile gaps between code and Figma. Also use when the user asks to create or generate any component in Figma — even a single one — since components require proper variable foundations, variant states, and design token bindings to be production-quality. This skill teaches WHAT to build and in WHAT ORDER — it complements the `figma-use` skill which teaches HOW to call the Plugin API. Both skills should be loaded together.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parallel control variable combination search via Stata. Exhaustively searches all subsets of optional controls to find the combination that maximises |t| of the independent variable. Activates when user says: "控制变量搜索", "搜控制变量", "control variable search", "跑控制变量组合", "暴力搜索", "调控制变量".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement reliability patterns for Claude API: circuit breakers, graceful degradation, idempotency, and fallback strategies. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic reliability", "claude circuit breaker", "claude fallback", "anthropic fault tolerance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Makes systems debuggable and reliably operable — instrumentation, alerting that is worth waking for, service objectives, and learning from failure. Use this to instrument a service, fix alerting that is ignored, set error budgets or reliability targets, prepare for on-call, or run a blameless post-incident review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans confounder control, variable adjustment logic, and bias mitigation strategies at the protocol stage for clinical, epidemiologic, translational, observational, and biomarker studies. Always use this skill when a user needs to identify major confounders, decide which variables should or should not be adjusted for, compare matching/stratification/weighting approaches, anticipate selection or measurement bias, or pressure-test a study design before execution. Focus on bias sensing, causal structure awareness, variable-role classification, and critical design review rather than generic statistical advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance, load, and reliability (SLO/SRE) planning for production readiness. Use when defining service level objectives, load characterization, capacity, latency budgets, stress/soak/spike test plans, false-positive baselines, and reliability targets. USE FOR: SLO/SLA definition, load testing plan, performance budget, capacity planning, reliability/SRE backlog, latency targets, error-budget policy. DO NOT USE FOR: executing load tests (use Azure Load Testing tooling), security threat modeling, RAI assessment, privacy/compliance planning, or authoring/restating PRD requirements (cite the PRD's existing NFR/FR ids instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare this period's reliability against the prior period using Agent Monitor data — error rate (APIError/total) and tool-failure rate (PreToolUse→PostToolUse gap) — flag any regression where reliability got worse, and optionally wire a persistent alert rule so the dashboard catches the next regression automatically. Use when checking whether reliability degraded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a CCAM reliability report from session outcomes, hook events, alerts, tool failures, and data freshness. Use for health reviews, incident follow-up, hook-delivery audits, or reliability trend summaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI co-counsel for divorce and family-law attorneys — a jurisdiction-portable scaffold spanning the full matter lifecycle. Eight operating modes mirror how a matter actually moves: intake and onboarding, financial disclosure, children and support, property division and QDRO, discovery and document review, drafting, negotiation and mediation prep, and court prep — plus post-judgment modification and enforcement. The methodology is jurisdiction-agnostic: it forces real, verifiable research for every local form, formula, or rule rather than inventing one, handling common-law, community-property, civil-law, and MENA personal-status regimes as variables. Built around one non-negotiable: privilege. It drafts, analyzes, organizes, and pressure-tests. It is not the lawyer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for Azure Reliability development including best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, and deployment. Use when choosing Azure regions, availability zones, geo-paired deployments, Queue Storage limits, or Web PubSub apps, and other Azure Reliability related development tasks. Not for Azure Monitor (use azure-monitor), Azure Resiliency (use azure-resiliency), Azure Service Health (use azure-service-health), Azure Sre Agent (use azure-sre-agent).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check whether an x402 payment endpoint is reliably delivering value before spending USDC on it. Returns paid delivery rate, active incidents, latency, and a clear proceed/warn/block recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) compliance under 16 CFR Part 312. Covers verifiable parental consent methods including signed forms, credit card verification, government ID, knowledge-based authentication, and video call. Includes FTC safe harbor programs and enforcement actions. Keywords: COPPA, FTC, children, parental consent, safe harbor, verifiable consent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies non-deterministic or unreliable tests through static code analysis and test result analysis. Use when Claude needs to find flaky tests, analyze test reliability, or investigate intermittent test failures. Supports Python (pytest, unittest) and Java (JUnit, TestNG) test frameworks. Trigger when users mention "flaky tests", "intermittent failures", "non-deterministic tests", "unreliable tests", or ask to "find flaky tests", "analyze test stability", or "why tests fail randomly".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an honest market-fit and viability audit of any project or idea and produce a decision doc, not code. Use when someone asks "is this viable as a business", "audit the market fit", "make the case and compare to competitors", "should I apply to YC or bootstrap", or wants to validate a project, product, or market before investing more time. Gathers verifiable traction data first, researches the competitive field, gets an independent cold read, writes a doc with pre-committed pass/middle/kill criteria and a concrete week-1 assignment, then hardens it with an adversarial review loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Mathematical Modeler. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Modeler judgment. Reasons from nondimensionalization, conservation/positivity laws, and minimal-viable model structure through mechanistic ODE/PDE, stochastic, and agent-based formulations, profile-likelihood and Fisher-information identifiability, and Sobol/Morris sensitivity analysis, while treating sloppy unidentifiable parameters, structural model uncertainty, and out-of-regime extrapolation as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan, implement, or review google cloud waf reliability work in an existing codebase with compatibility, security, and verification controls. Use when the user explicitly requests google cloud waf reliability work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。