「interviewing」の検索結果

Systematically deconstruct written content into verifiable claims, validate each using search/documentation, and facilitate informed discussion through structured interviewing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview Question Generator — produces 40-60 questions across behavioral (STAR), technical, culture, situational categories with scoring rubrics and recommended loop structure

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Anthropologist/Archeologist working in cultural resource management (CRM) — scoping a Section 106 Phase I identification survey, designing a shovel-test-pit sampling strategy, evaluating National Register of Historic Places eligibility under Criteria A-D, interpreting excavation stratigraphy via a Harris matrix and radiocarbon results, or running the ethnographic field-methods branch (participant observation, informant interviewing) for a cultural-anthropology component of a project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares for hiring manager rounds at Staff+ (L6+) level — scope of impact, influence without authority, ambiguity navigation, mentorship, strategic thinking. Use when practicing HM rounds or calibrating story depth for target level. Activate on "hiring manager round", "HM screen", "staff level", "scope of impact". NOT for coding interviews, system design, behavioral/values rounds, or resume writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interviewing the owner to a shared understanding before any work starts. Use when a plan, a decision or an idea needs stress-testing, or when the owner asks to be grilled, interviewed or questioned about one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research a specific company before applying or interviewing by gathering facts from primary and official sources, recording the source and date behind every claim, and keeping anonymous or unverifiable material clearly separated from confirmed fact. Use when a user asks what a company actually does, how it makes money, what its published conditions are, whether a posting matches the company's own disclosures, or what to verify before an interview; do not use to predict hiring outcomes, to repeat review-site content as fact, or to bulk-crawl sites that prohibit automated access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to evolve the features of a PRD roadmap with user stories — 'refinar as histórias da feature', 'escrever histórias de usuário', 'critérios de aceite', 'regras de negócio da feature', 'deixar a feature pronta', 'user stories for FT01' — one feature at a time, interviewing the human until each story meets the Definition of Ready: persona, value, INVEST, CA (Gherkin, happy and error paths) and RN from the PRD. Do NOT use to create the roadmap (prd-roadmap) or to change requirements without stories (prd-refine).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and approve feature requirements through focused interviewing and repository research. Use when the user has a feature idea, unclear scope, conflicting requirements, or needs Flow context artifacts before design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a tailored AGENTS.md for any new project by interviewing the user about their skill gaps, project goals, and tech context. Load when the user asks to set up a project, initialize agents, create an AGENTS.md, bootstrap a repo, onboard agents to a codebase, or says "set up this project for agents". Also triggers on "write an AGENTS.md for this project", "configure agents for my repo", "project bootstrap", "agent onboarding", or when the user starts a new project and needs agent-ready configuration. Re-run when new context arrives (PRD written, stack changes, team changes) to update the AGENTS.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply rapport-based elicitation to resistant or semi-cooperative humans and agents. Use when coercive prompting or brittle handoffs damage cooperation. NOT for routine cooperative tasks, pure technical debugging, or already reliable exchanges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。