「lint gate」の検索結果

有馬記念分析システムのアーキテクチャ/レイヤー境界レビュー。docs/ARCHITECTURE.md のレイヤー構成（commands / domain / repositories / models / features / constants / database / utils / types）に対し、レイヤーディレクトリの意味と配置、参照系(queries)と更新系(aggregates)の分離、DB 接続の注入可能性とテスト容易性、リッチドメインモデルの維持（commands 肥大・ドメイン貧血症）、重み・閾値の constants 単一定義、ファイル配置と命名語彙の一致、不要な抽象化、種別分岐のポリモーフィズム化、生成引数の凝集（5個以上は分割シグナル）を検証。純粋性・依存方向の逆流・DB 接続の生成箇所は lint が error で担保するため扱わない。Use when user says 'アーキテクチャレビュー', 'レイヤー境界チェック', 'review architecture', or '依存方向の確認'.

Quality gates determinísticos para Vue.js, JavaScript e TypeScript. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate Vue.js", ESLint, vue-tsc ou Vitest em projeto Vue.js, cobertura, complexidade, bundle, acessibilidade ou baseline para Vue.js.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gates determinísticos para aplicações e serviços Node.js, JavaScript e TypeScript. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate Node.js", ESLint ou tsc em Node.js, testes, cobertura, complexidade, SAST, SCA, build ou baseline para Node.js.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawの変更内容に合うテストやチェックを選び、失敗原因を調べるスキル。ローカル検証から環境依存の確認、リリース検証の担当手順への振り分けまで扱います。

• ソース変更に合う検証を選びたいとき
• 不具合の再現と修正確認
• CIの失敗原因を調べたいとき

GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline configuration for Golang projects — workflow files for test, lint, SAST, coverage and vulnerability-scan jobs, Dependabot and Renovate config files, GoReleaser release pipelines, Docker build/push, repository security settings, and AI-driven PR review. Use when setting up or improving Go project CI, writing or fixing `.github/workflows/*.yml`, adding a linter or security scanner as a pipeline job, wiring automated dependency-update bots, or adding quality gates. Covers wiring tools into a pipeline, not the analysis they perform: do NOT use for choosing or interpreting security findings (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security` skill) or for choosing, upgrading, or auditing dependency versions (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-dependency-management` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up or run design QA gates — token + hardcoded-value lint, automated a11y (axe), contrast, visual regression across variants/states/themes/RTL, and the manual a11y checklist. Use when the user wants CI quality gates, to prevent design regressions, or to QA a component/screen before shipping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up or refine open-source .NET code-quality gates for CI: formatting, `.editorconfig`, SDK analyzers, third-party analyzers, coverage, mutation testing, architecture tests, and security scanning. USE FOR: .NET quality gates in CI; analyzer, coverage, mutation, and architecture-test choices; standardizing `.editorconfig`, `dotnet format`, and warning policy. DO NOT USE FOR: non-.NET repositories; generic CI/CD guidance with no .NET quality stack decisions. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Chous in .NET repositories that ship sizeable frontend codebases and want file-structure linting, naming convention enforcement, and folder-layout policy as a CLI gate. USE FOR: growing frontend trees; naming, folder, or file-placement policy; CI checks for frontend layout drift. DO NOT USE FOR: semantic code bugs, type errors, or framework API misuse; CSS, HTML, or JS rule enforcement inside files. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoke when the user asks to review, check, audit, or look over Qt6 QML code -- or suggest before committing. Runs deterministic linting (47+ rules) then six parallel deep- analysis agents covering bindings, layout, loaders, delegates, states, and performance. Optionally invokes system qmllint for type-level checks. Reports only high-confidence issues (>80/100) with structured mitigations. Read-only -- never modifies code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to add or review fuzz testing for Java APIs with CATS — including contract-driven negative testing, malformed payload validation, boundary input exploration, CI integration, reproducible failures, and local execution guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Add fuzz testing to a Java project; Use CATS for API negative testing; Review CI quality gates for API contract robustness; Improve boundary and malformed input test coverage; Run CATS fuzz tests against an OpenAPI contract. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need Azure DevOps CLI guidance to verify installation, configure organization and project context, discover work item IDs by optional WIQL filters, and execute safe work-item create/update operations. Uses an interactive install gate - if `az` or the Azure DevOps extension is missing, ask whether to show installation guidance before any work item commands. This should trigger for requests such as Azure DevOps work item list; List Azure Boards work item IDs; Azure DevOps WIQL query; Azure DevOps CLI planning workflow. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, implementing, reviewing, testing, or cleaning up feature toggles, feature flags, kill switches, runtime configuration gates, canary controls, staged rollouts, experiments, or temporary compatibility switches in Java enterprise systems. This should trigger for requests such as Design a feature toggle strategy; Review this feature flag; Add a kill switch safely; Test toggle on and off paths; Clean up an expired feature toggle; Plan controlled rollout and rollback behavior. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and run configured quality gates for requested or changed work, preserve diagnostics as evidence, route failures to the appropriate causal/domain capability, and verify corrections. Use for linting, formatting, type-checking, configured hook checks, or pre-completion quality verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a whole deliverable (talk, course module, paper, chapter, or referee report) against its manifest without rewriting it. Runs a deterministic gate for build, citations, numbers, facts, and leaks and stops on failure, then runs a finder over each section and a strong-model pass over the whole work, and adjudicates into checks/<date>/findings.json and report.md with anchored findings, severities, and honest NOT CHECKED coverage within a dollar budget. Use when asked to lint or review the whole talk, module, or paper, for a pre-ship review, or for the night shift. Revision stays serial and author-led.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design lightweight CI quality gates—lint, test tiers, security scans, and merge policies. Use when setting up or improving pipelines without tying to one stack only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. It also covers buying on the AI answer surface — ads inside Google AI Overviews and AI Mode that existing Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns already serve into with no opt-out, no placement targeting and no segmented reporting, and ChatGPT Ads and Microsoft Copilot as separate opt-in platforms with their own plan-tier reach limits, no negative keywords, and a landing-page crawler gate. It also owns the conversion signal the bidding algorithms learn from — CRM pipeline stages (SQL, opportunity, closed-won) sent back to Google Ads, LinkedIn, Meta and Microsoft Ads through offline conversion import, enhanced conversions for leads, the Google Data Manager API and the LinkedIn Conversions API, with click-ID capture, stage values, dedupe, EEA consent signals and retractions. It also gates connected TV (CTV) and streaming video for B2B — whether a reach medium belongs in the plan, how a vendor ties a TV household to a target account (member data, IP-to-account graph or contextual), the server-side ad insertion (SSAI) fraud questions, Programmatic Guaranteed deals, and a holdout lift test because CTV has no click. It also runs person-led paid social — LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads and Meta partnership ads that put spend behind an employee's or creator's post — on a paid-usage term, an in-post disclosure check and an end-date register, because the platform approval carries no term. Also triggers on: CTV, connected TV, OTT, streaming TV ads, should we run CTV, LinkedIn CTV, B2B CTV, account-based CTV, SSAI fraud, thought leader ads, boost an employee's post, sponsor a creator's post, partnership ads, whitelisting, creator usage rights, PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have, ads in AI Overviews, AI Mode ads, ChatGPT Ads, OpenAI Ads Manager, Copilot ads, conversational ads, should we advertise on ChatGPT, can we buy our way into the AI answer, our ads are showing in AI Overviews and we cannot report on it, context hints, OAI-AdsBot, our ad landing page fails review, robots.txt is blocking our ads, our paid leads are junk, Google Ads is optimizing for the wrong leads, offline conversion import, OCI, enhanced conversions for leads, send CRM stages back to Google Ads, upload SQLs to LinkedIn, LinkedIn Conversions API, LinkedIn CAPI, Meta conversion leads, CRM to ad platform, gclid, li_fat_id, msclkid, value-based bidding, optimize for pipeline not form fills, low match rate, conversion lag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run this after every code change in this Vue project, before committing, before opening a PR, or whenever the user says "verify", "check", "lint", "run tests", "build", "audit". Diff audit (router guards, store boundaries, UX, /ui consistency, error handling) → lint → tests + coverage gate → build. Coverage drops → add tests, never lower thresholds. Triggers on "is this ready to commit?", "any issues?", "tests passing?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Catalog-then-fix slop removal on an existing prose draft. Parallel catalog subagents inventory four slop categories (theatrics, overwrought register, corrective antithesis, dramatic short sentences), fix subagents repair only what a catalog names, mechanical lint + frequency analysis bracket the run, and a regression gate (lint delta, word count, cold meaning check) decides whether the result ships. Use when the user says "deslop this draft", "catalog deslop", "strip the AI patterns from this file", or as the final stage of the article-factory and mosaic-writing skills. For writing or redrafting prose from scratch, use the prose skill instead - this skill only repairs an existing draft in place.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality gate for agent-flow. Runs the repo's test, typecheck and lint commands in the issue worktree, re-runs failures once, reports raw output as JSON. Never modifies code. Use when launched with AGENT_FLOW_ROLE=qa after a review is approved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Quality] Use when you need to research and configure code quality tooling for any tech stack — linters, formatters, static analysis, pre-commit hooks, and CI gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

差分が「その差分自身を審査するレビュー基準・品質ゲート」を弱めていないかを diff-time で検出する。Check 1 レビュールールの削除・弱体化（.river/rules.md / .river/rules.d/*）、Check 2 実行時コンフィグの閾値・ゲート緩和（.river-review.{json,yaml,yml} の review.severity 引き下げ / exclude 拡大 / memory.suppressionEnabled 無効化 / selection.skills.exclude 追加）、Check 3 suppression entry の新規追加、Check 4 lint・静的解析設定からのルール削除や無効化、Check 5 branch protection・required check の緩和、の 5 Check を対象とし、これらが機能変更と同一 PR に混在し、かつ意図の宣言が無い場合に指摘する。report-only。workflow の permissions / action pin は gha-workflow-security、既存 suppression entry の使い分けは suppression-feedback、設定ファイルの一般的妥当性は config-json、.only / .skip / @ts-ignore / @ts-nocheck は heuristic-review.mjs の決定論検出器、リファクタと機能追加の混在は behavior-structure-separation へ委譲する

コード品質の最終確認。Skill: code-review (built-in) で correctness bug を検出 → main agent が findings を修正 → lint/ty 静的解析 → 条件付きで security-reviewer / critic を spawn (security 関連変更 or plan/requirements.md がある時のみ)。「品質チェックして」「品質ゲート通して」「レビューして」「コードを確認して」「PR 出す前にチェック」「セキュリティ大丈夫？」「コード見て」で発動。

Set up repository-local Husky pre-commit hooks with lint-staged, Prettier, and optional typecheck/test gates. Use when a user asks to add pre-commit hooks, configure lint-staged, enforce staged formatting, or add commit-time checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforces minimum quality thresholds in CI including code coverage, linting, type checking, and security scanning. Provides required checks, PR rules, and automated enforcement. Use for "quality gates", "CI checks", "code quality", or "PR requirements".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。