「litigation」の検索結果

Use this skill whenever a lawyer or mediator needs help analyzing a dispute for mediation purposes. This includes: reviewing case materials (pleadings, contracts, correspondence, evidence) to identify issues in dispute, summarizing each party's position and interests, conducting legal analysis of the key issues, proposing mediation strategies or settlement directions, and preparing for mediation sessions. Trigger this skill when the user mentions 'mediation', 'dispute analysis', 'settlement', 'dispute resolution', 'identify issues in dispute', 'party positions', 'mediation brief', 'case analysis for mediation', 'ADR', 'mediation preparation', 'caucus strategy', 'settlement options', or any request to analyze a conflict between two or more parties with the goal of finding resolution. Also trigger when the user uploads case files and asks for a structured breakdown of who wants what, what the core disagreements are, or how the case might settle. Even if the user doesn't explicitly say 'mediation', trigger when the context involves analyzing opposing positions in a dispute with a resolution-oriented (rather than litigation-oriented) goal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces properly-formatted legal documents in Word (.docx). The user provides the substantive content (instructions, attached files, project knowledge); the skill handles document architecture and formatting. * No precedent or template required * Seven document families: agreements, corporate documents, litigation, memos, employment, policies, correspondence * Jurisdiction-agnostic — works across any legal system the user specifies * Multi-Chain numbering, defined-terms convention, structured recitals, atomic signature blocks * Also reformats existing .docx to a consistent house style * Works in Claude.ai, Cowork, and Claude for Word

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate legal documents from any language into English while preserving .docx formatting and translating track changes and headers/footers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to translate a legal document, contract, deed, agreement, or any formal legal text into English. Also trigger when the user mentions translating .docx files that contain legal content, or asks for a "format-preserving translation" of a legal document. This skill covers all legal domains: finance, M&A, corporate, IP, real estate, regulatory, consumer, taxes, litigation, SaaS and more. Even if the user just says "translate this contract" or "translate this into English", use this skill if the document is legal in nature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate legal documents from any language into English while preserving .docx formatting and translating track changes and headers/footers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to translate a legal document, contract, deed, agreement, or any formal legal text into English. Also trigger when the user mentions translating .docx files that contain legal content, or asks for a "format-preserving translation" of a legal document. This skill covers all legal domains: finance, M&A, corporate, IP, real estate, regulatory, consumer, taxes, litigation, SaaS and more. Even if the user just says "translate this contract" or "translate this into English", use this skill if the document is legal in nature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes the formal letter you send before suing someone in a civil case in England & Wales — the Letter Before Claim that starts the pre-action clock. The part it gets right is which pre-action protocol applies — debt, professional negligence, housing disrepair, personal injury, or the default Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct — each of which has its own rules a generic letter misses (the 30-day debt window, the professional-negligence preliminary-notice step). It also flags the limitation deadline for a solicitor to confirm rather than stating it as fact. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small firms without a precedent to copy. Use when the user says 'draft an LBC', 'letter before claim', 'pre-action letter', 'pre-action protocol', or needs to start the pre-action clock before issuing a civil claim. Verify the current protocol before sending.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a litigation chronology from the disclosure bundle itself — every entry attributed to its source document, behind a CPR 31.22 implied-undertaking check, because documents disclosed in English proceedings may only be used for those proceedings. Adds a privilege screen and case-theory significance tagging, so the output is court-facing work product, not a loose timeline. Use when the user asks to build a chronology or timeline from a disclosure bundle, a matter file, or witness statements, or says 'build the chron', 'what happened when', or needs a Statement of Facts ready timeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Works out which documents you have to hand over to the other side in a civil case in England & Wales, and builds the formal list. The part it gets right that trips people up is which disclosure regime applies — Practice Direction 57AD (the Disclosure Pilot, now permanent in the Business and Property Courts, with its Models A–E) or standard disclosure under CPR Part 31 everywhere else. It picks the regime, chooses a Model per issue, structures the Disclosure Review Document, and drafts the disclosure certificate for the party to sign personally. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small teams without a precedent bank. Use when the user says 'disclosure list', 'PD 57AD', 'Model C', 'extended disclosure', 'List of Documents', 'N265', or needs to work out what must be disclosed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

US web checkout via the StoreKit External Purchase Link entitlement — currently 0% Apple commission (litigation ongoing), how to ship it safely, and how to architect for a commission flip so a future ruling is a config change, not a rewrite. Use when adding external purchase links, weighing web checkout vs IAP, or planning US-storefront pricing strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your legal, IP, and regulatory brain trust. 31 named personas across 7 cells covering patent strategy, tech licensing, regulatory litigation, AI governance, open-source compliance, privacy law, and antitrust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Risk analysis, regulatory risk assessment, competitive risk, macro risk, technology risk, litigation risk, financial risk assessment, enterprise risk, operational risk, geopolitical risk exposure

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate music with Suno (v5 / v5.5 era, 2026) and advise a production team on what they may legally do with the output. Use this skill when a user wants to create, extend, remaster, or stem-separate a track in Suno; craft Suno prompts (style field, lyrics/metatags, exclude-styles, personas, custom voices); choose a subscription tier for a given use; or get accurate answers about ownership, commercial rights, distribution/monetization on DSPs, the Warner Music Group settlement, the ongoing label/publisher litigation, and Suno's API situation. Do not use it for other music generators (Udio, ElevenLabs Music, Google Lyria) except by explicit contrast, and do not use it as a substitute for a lawyer on a specific commercial deal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect image copyright infringement risks by comparing against a database of registered copyrighted works with similarity scoring, TRO litigation history, and radar-based infringement assessment. Triggered when users mention copyright detection, image infringement check, copyright risk analysis, TRO risk, copyright similarity search, rights owner lookup, or copyright compliance verification. Even if the user does not explicitly say "copyright," this skill should be triggered whenever the need involves checking whether an image may infringe registered copyright works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query patent legal status information from the Nexscope (Nexscope) database. Triggered when users mention patent legal status, patent validity check, patent status query, patent event history, simple legal status, legal events such as transfer, license, pledge, opposition, litigation, re-examination, patent legal status, patent validity, patent events, transfer/license/pledge, Nexscope, or patent status lookup. Also triggered when users ask whether a patent is active, inactive, pending, expired, granted, withdrawn, or revoked, or want to look up legal status by patent ID or publication number.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces structured, citation-backed summaries of U.S. insurance policies, endorsements, claims files, and coverage correspondence for coverage analysis and insurance litigation. Use when summarizing policies, declarations, claims files, reservation-of-rights letters, denial letters, or coverage disputes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured initial contact summary memorandum from a potential client's first interaction with the firm. Captures case facts, liability indicators, damages, insurance details, and screening criteria. Use during client intake to support conflict checks, case evaluation, and engagement decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts due diligence checklists for U.S. corporate transactions (M&A, asset purchases, investments, JVs, restructurings). Covers corporate structure, financials, tax, contracts, IP, litigation, employment, benefits, insurance, and environmental compliance. Surfaces change-of-control triggers, consent requirements, and red flags. Use when preparing for deal closing, board presentations, or investor disclosure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces structured summaries of U.S. divorce settlement agreements (MSAs), extracting material terms across property, custody, support, taxes, insurance, fees, and deadlines. Triggers on requests for divorce settlement summary, MSA summary, marital settlement agreement, property division, child custody, parenting plan, child support, or alimony extraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze insurance claims workflow systems for intake optimization, adjudication rules, subrogation, litigation management, and settlement analytics. Use when: 'audit claims process', 'review FNOL workflow', 'evaluate claims automation', 'check subrogation recovery', 'assess claims fraud detection', 'optimize claims cycle time', 'review Guidewire ClaimCenter setup'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US B2B law firms — corporate, IP/patent, M&A and securities, employment, commercial litigation, regulatory/compliance, data privacy/cyber, real estate, and tax. Triggers on "find three boutique IP law firms in California", "shortlist M&A counsel for a Series-B fundraise", "patent prosecution for our hardware startup", or "pull contact info for these 10 law firm domains", even when described indirectly (outside counsel, cap-table review, GDPR/SOC2 oversight). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip personal/consumer legal services where the user is the end client (divorce, personal injury, criminal defense, family law, estate planning, wills) — the catalog is B2B-only. Also skip in-house GC hires, "is this NDA enforceable" DIY questions, non-US firms, individual freelancers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review commercial contracts, NDAs, MSAs, SOWs, and vendor agreements for obligation clarity, risk allocation, termination, data handling, and negotiation red flags. Use when a user needs a structured contract summary, red flag list, fallback positions, or clause-by-clause review. Do not use as jurisdiction-specific legal advice, litigation strategy, or final legal sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured legal due diligence for M&A, joint ventures, or investment transactions. Cover all 9 workstreams — Corporate, Contracts, IP, Litigation, Regulatory, Employment, Tax, Environmental, and Data Privacy. Produce a risk matrix with deal-breaker flags and closing conditions. Use when evaluating a target or counterparty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate resumption of any multi-day LLM batch-scoring campaign that calls an unpinned model alias (deepseek-chat, gpt-*-latest, gemini-*-preview, any provider alias without a pinned version). Use when: (1) resuming a paused or credit-exhausted scoring run days after its last chunk, (2) topping up credits to finish a campaign, (3) extending a cached scoring pipeline with new items. Prevents silently splicing two model versions or serving revisions into one measure. Verified 2026-07-16: for $0.30 caught a serving-revision drift WITHIN DeepSeek v4-flash (same alias, same family, litigation scores systematically shifted across a 2-day gap) before an $83 resume spend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。