「mechanisms」の検索結果

Comprehensive persistence tradecraft for authorized red team engagements covering Windows and Linux mechanisms. Windows techniques include registry Run/RunOnce keys, scheduled tasks, WMI event subscriptions, DLL search order hijacking, COM object hijacking, Startup folder drops, service creation, Security Support Provider (SSP) DLL injection, and Active Directory persistence (AdminSDHolder abuse, DCShadow, Golden Ticket, Silver Ticket, Skeleton Key, SID History injection). Linux techniques include cron and at jobs, systemd timers and services, SSH authorized_keys injection, shell profile backdoors (.bashrc/.bash_profile), PAM module backdoors, LD_PRELOAD hijacking, kernel module rootkits, web shells, and Git hook abuse. Provides operator-ready command sequences for SharPersist, Impacket ticketer, schtasks, sc.exe, crontab, and systemctl with OPSEC considerations for each method. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1547 (Boot or Logon Autostart), T1053 (Scheduled Task/Job), T1546 (Event Triggered Execution), T1556 (Modify Authentication Process), and sub-techniques. Includes detection indicators and a rapid engagement cheatsheet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. Use when you have experimental observations or data and need to formulate testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, and design experiments to test them. Follows scientific method framework. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming; for automated LLM-driven hypothesis testing on datasets use hypogenic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate testable hypotheses. Formulate from observations, design experiments, explore competing explanations, develop predictions, propose mechanisms, for scientific inquiry across domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. Use when you have experimental observations or data and need to formulate testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, and design experiments to test them. Follows scientific method framework. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming; for automated LLM-driven hypothesis testing on datasets use hypogenic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Hive Mind collective intelligence system for queen-led multi-agent coordination with consensus mechanisms and persistent memory

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. Use when you have experimental observations or data and need to formulate testable hypotheses with predictions, propose mechanisms, and design experiments to test them. Also owns explicit HypoGeniC-style or automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation/testing requests inside this single skill. For open-ended ideation use scientific-brainstorming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the ChEMBL database for bioactive molecules, drug targets, bioactivity data, approved drugs, and chemical structures. Use when the user asks about compounds, targets, IC50/Ki values, drug mechanisms, or structure searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MAGeCK (Model-based Analysis of Genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout) for pooled CRISPR screen analysis. Covers count normalization, gene ranking, and pathway analysis. Use when identifying essential genes, drug targets, or resistance mechanisms from dropout or enrichment screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract and analyze mutational signatures from somatic variants using SigProfiler or MutationalPatterns to characterize mutagenic processes. Use when identifying DNA damage mechanisms or etiology in cancer genomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure deserialization playbook. Use when Java, PHP, or Python applications deserialize untrusted data via ObjectInputStream, unserialize, pickle, or similar mechanisms that may lead to RCE, file access, or privilege escalation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design the small details -- triggers, rules, feedback, loops and modes -- that separate good products from great ones. Use when the user mentions "microinteraction", "button feedback", "loading state", "toggle design", "animation detail", "state transitions", "input feedback", "the interface feels dead", "make the UI feel responsive", or "add polish to interactions". Also trigger when designing form-validation responses, progress indicators, confirmation dialogs, or any element where the user expects immediate feedback. Covers trigger design, state rules, feedback mechanisms, and progressive loops. For overall UI polish, see refactoring-ui. For affordance design, see design-everyday-things.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate 3D animation scripts and lay explanations for drug mechanisms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design evidence-discovery and validation workflows for drug repurposing studies by integrating disease mechanisms, drug-target logic, expression reversal, real-world evidence, and validation routes into a closed-loop study blueprint.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based medical knowledge and research mentor grounded in the Bian Que tradition. Covers clinical reasoning, diagnostic thinking (望闻问切), pharmacology, pathology, differential diagnosis, medical literature appraisal, and the philosophy of early intervention. Trigger whenever users ask about medicine, clinical science, drugs, disease mechanisms, diagnosis, lab interpretation, treatment comparison, or health sciences. Even without explicit research framing, trigger on any topic touching disease, therapeutics, or clinical decision-making. Part of the AIPOCH Medical Research Skill Hub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Composes a Discussion around key findings, mechanisms, clinical relevance, and limitations. Use when writing or improving a Discussion section for any biomedical manuscript — including interpreting results, connecting to prior literature, addressing unexpected findings, framing limitations, and writing the conclusion. Also triggers on "write my discussion", "help me discuss my findings", "how do I compare to prior studies", "write the limitations paragraph", or "draft a discussion for my paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement safety interlocks and protective mechanisms to prevent equipment damage and ensure safe control system operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-protocol consensus for agent swarms supporting Raft leader election, Byzantine fault tolerance, Gossip state propagation, and CRDT conflict-free merging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand anti-reversing, obfuscation, and protection techniques encountered during software analysis. Use when analyzing protected binaries, bypassing anti-debugging for authorized analysis, or understanding software protection mechanisms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether prior learnings actually fired, then install mechanisms for this run's recurrences. No finding without an install path and a firing test. Triggers: retrospective, reflect, what did we learn, patterns, post-mortem, why does this keep happening.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building the theoretical engine for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — mechanisms, process vs. variance logic, constructs, and boundary conditions. Builds the argument; it does not select methods or run analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing and applying a theory-construction method for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — building constructs, defining their domain, specifying relationships, articulating the underlying logic/mechanisms, and setting boundary conditions. This is the THEORY-CONSTRUCTION craft, NOT empirical method; AMR publishes no datasets, no measures, and no statistical tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

chrome-devtools-mcp launcher — a single bash script that resolves Playwright's bundled Chrome-for-Testing and Node.js directly through Nix. See repo README for usage, override mechanisms, and version compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment (access, delete, correct, opt-out of sale/sharing, limit SPI, ADMT opt-out), privacy notice drafting, service provider vs. contractor vs. third-party classification, sensitive personal information (SPI) handling, data minimization, opt-out mechanisms (including GPC), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live since Jan 1, 2026), ADMT obligations (effective 2026, deadline Jan 1, 2027), CPPA enforcement (Disney $2.75M, PlayOn $1.1M, Ford $375K), penalty exposure, GDPR comparison, and gap assessments for businesses operating in or targeting California residents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。