「men」の検索結果

Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

製品の要望や企画書を、開発に着手できる具体的な要件へ整理します。業務ルール、データ、サービス間の接点、未決事項を明文化し、次の担当へ引き継ぎます。

• 製品要求書を開発要件に落としたいとき
• 複数サービスにまたがる機能の要件整理
• レビューで繰り返す前提の文書化

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetches comments from an Instagram post including comment text, username, timestamp, like count and reply count. Use when user mentions Instagram comments scraping, get comments from Instagram post, Instagram comment list, pull Instagram comments, read Instagram comments, Instagram post discussion, extract Instagram comments, comment data from Instagram, IG post replies, who commented on Instagram.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing quizzes, personality assessments, and recommendation tools that segment users into actionable categories rather than generating clicks for clicks' sake. Question architecture, scoring algorithms, result categorization, recommendation mapping, lead capture integration. Honest about clickbait-quiz (engagement only), vanity-result (entertaining, not useful), and actionable-segmentation (genuine categorization that drives next-step recommendations) patterns. Triggers on quiz, assessment, personality test, recommendation tool, scorecard, diagnostic, fit evaluator, what-type-of-X-are-you, persona quiz. Also triggers when an audience needs a categorization-driven lead magnet, when a vanity quiz is producing engagement but no qualified leads, or when an assessment is being scoped for the first time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A platform decision framework for experimentation. When to use Statsig vs PostHog vs GrowthBook vs Optimizely vs Amplitude vs Eppo vs Kameleoon. How to migrate between them. How to coordinate when multi-platform is genuinely warranted. The decisions that compound for years and the ones you can defer. Triggers on which experimentation platform, choose Statsig vs PostHog, evaluate experimentation tools, switch experimentation platform, migrate from Optimizely, consolidate experimentation tools, multi-platform experimentation, experimentation platform decision, ab test platform selection, feature flag platform vs experiment platform, warehouse-native experiments, vendor lock-in experimentation. Also triggers when a team is asking about cost, governance, or migration cost across experimentation tools, or when an evaluation is starting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document development environment requirements for team consistency and AI agent understanding during PRD v0.6 Architecture. Triggers on requests to define environment setup, document tooling, create dev setup guide, or when user asks "what tools do I need?", "environment setup", "dev environment", "CLI requirements", "project setup", "onboarding setup". Consumes TECH- (stack selections), ARC- (architecture decisions). Outputs ENV- entries for development, CI/CD, and infrastructure environments. Feeds v0.7 Build Execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate owner-developer agreements covering scope, entitlements, schedule, pricing (fixed, GMP, cost-plus), change orders, payment and retainage, insurance, indemnity, IP, confidentiality, termination, and disputes. Use when user mentions "development agreement", "owner-developer agreement", "project development contract", "real estate development", "GMP", "cost-plus", "milestones", or "change orders".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts structured data from large sets of legal documents into tabular format for review, analysis, and reporting. Processes contracts, agreements, correspondence, filings, and other legal documents in bulk — extracting key terms, dates, parties, obligations, risks, and custom fields into organized tables. Use when conducting due diligence document review, bulk contract extraction, compliance audits across document sets, lease portfolio analysis, employment agreement review, regulatory filing review, or any task requiring structured extraction from multiple documents. Trigger keywords: tabular review, bulk extraction, document review table, data room review, batch document analysis, contract extraction, portfolio review, structured extraction, document comparison table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal audit support skill aligned with IIA (Institute of Internal Auditors) International Standards. Provides risk-based audit planning, audit program development, workpaper documentation, finding development (Condition/Criteria/Cause/Effect), and Corrective Action Request (CAR) tracking. Use when: planning annual/quarterly audits, creating risk assessment matrices, developing audit programs and test procedures, documenting audit workpapers, writing audit findings and reports, tracking corrective actions and follow-ups, preparing for external audits (SOX, ISO). Triggers: "internal audit", "audit plan", "audit program", "audit workpaper", "audit finding", "risk assessment", "CAR tracking", "corrective action", "IIA Standards", "COSO framework", "監査計画", "監査プログラム", "監査調書", "是正措置", "リスク評価".

Knowledge base from the FAA Systems Engineering Manual (SEM) v1.0.1. Use for civil-agency systems engineering as the FAA practices it inside the Acquisition Management System (AMS) and the National Airspace System (NAS): the five-phase AMS lifecycle and its decision points; operational concept development and implementation-free functional analysis (ConOps, FFBD/N², CMLs); requirements analysis and architectural design synthesis (PRS→MRS, the PRD ratchet pPRD→iPRD→fPRD, RAM, ISEF/DoDAF views, CPRs); the seven technical management disciplines (Integrated Technical Management/SEMP, Interface Management/IRD-ICD, Risk-Issue-Opportunity, Configuration Management, SE Information Management, Decision Analysis, Verification & Validation); and the specialty disciplines (RMA via Service Threads/STLSC, Life Cycle Engineering, E3/Spectrum, Human Factors, Information Security via the NIST RMF, System Safety via the SMS, and Hazardous Materials/Environmental/EOSH). Scope limits: this is FAA-specific guidance, not policy — it is a tailorable menu that points outward to companion handbooks (FAA-HDBK-006A for RMA, the SMS Manual, the NIST 800-series) rather than restating generic SE theory; it is thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting/FAR law, software-development methodology, named anti-pattern catalogues, and any non-FAA or non-civil-aviation lifecycle. Source has no page numbers in the extracted text (~360 pp.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a DRAFT product requirements document from the discovery notes, interview summaries, support themes, analytics notes and stakeholder messages the user provides: problem statement, target users, goals with measures as stated, numbered requirements each with a testable acceptance criterion, non-goals, constraints, dependencies and open questions, with every statement tagged evidenced, assumed or UNKNOWN so each assumption is visible for the product owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write a PRD", "draft the product requirements", "turn these discovery notes into requirements", "document what this feature needs to do" or "build the requirements doc for this epic". Do not use for supplier-facing requirements in a tender, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for a technical design decision, use architecture-decision-record; for the change ticket that ships the work, use change-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolves a PostHog experiment reference from natural language to a concrete experiment ID by browsing `experiment-list` (not feature-flag tools), with disambiguation when multiple experiments match. Use when the user names or quotes an experiment ("split test demo", "the File engagement boost experiment", "onboarding retention test", "landing page hero experiment", "pricing experiment"), describes it loosely ("the signup experiment", "my pricing test", "the one with the new checkout"), uses a relative reference ("latest", "most recent", "the one I created yesterday"), filters by status (running, draft, stopped, archived), or otherwise refers to an experiment by anything other than its concrete ID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Feishuの共有フォルダー内のファイルを一覧表示・移動・削除し、サブフォルダー作成や文書コメントの確認・追加・返信を行うスキル。保存先の整理とコメント対応に使えます。

• 共有フォルダーのファイル整理
• 共有フォルダー内のサブフォルダー作成
• 文書のコメントと返信を確認したいとき

Guides Stripe integration decisions across development and test environment planning (separate sandboxes vs the shared test mode sandbox), API selection (Checkout Sessions vs PaymentIntents), Connect platform setup (Accounts v2, controller properties), billing/subscriptions, tax and registrations (Stripe Tax, automatic_tax, product tax codes), Treasury financial accounts, integration options (Checkout, Payment Element), migrating from deprecated Stripe APIs, and security best practices (API key management, API key permissions, webhooks, OAuth). Use when planning, building, modifying, testing, or reviewing any Stripe integration, including choosing a development environment, accepting payments, building marketplaces, integrating Stripe, processing payments, setting up subscriptions, collecting sales tax, VAT, or GST, creating connected accounts, or implementing secure key handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about Stripe Connect configuration, charge patterns, Dashboard access, or how to get started with Connect, is building a marketplace, platform, multi-vendor store, gig platform, or subscription platform, needs to pay out sellers, vendors, or providers, mentions split payments, revenue sharing, multi-party payments, or similar payment distribution concepts, provides a company URL or business description for a recommendation, builds SaaS that routes money between parties (for example, POS, booking, invoicing — not operational SaaS without payment routing), asks about onboarding or KYC for merchants, sellers, and vendors, mentions connected account Dashboard or responsibility configurations, or asks about payment flows, white-label payments, or embedded payments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects A/B chromatin compartments from balanced Hi-C contact matrices via eigenvector decomposition of the distance-normalized, Pearson-correlated cis matrix with cooltools (eigs_cis), then orients (phases) the compartment eigenvector against a GC or gene-density track so the active (A) sign is not arbitrary. Covers the eigenvector-is-a-choice problem (per-arm view_df to remove the centromere gradient; picking the eigenvector by max correlation with activity, not by eigenvalue), GC phasing with bioframe.frac_gc, resolution choice (100kb-1Mb), saddle plots and saddle_strength for compartmentalization strength, the cohesin-loss-strengthens-compartments result, subcompartments (SNIPER/Calder/dcHiC), and cross-condition compartment switching. Use when calling A/B compartments, computing E1/eigenvectors, phasing the eigenvector, building saddle plots, choosing a compartment resolution, quantifying compartment strength, or comparing compartmentalization across conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend runtime and V2 scene management: run recommendation requests, manage recommend scenes and rules, and verify the deployed recommendation path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides Stripe integration decisions across development and test environment planning (separate sandboxes vs the shared test mode sandbox), API selection (Checkout Sessions vs PaymentIntents), Connect platform setup (Accounts v2, controller properties), billing/subscriptions, tax and registrations (Stripe Tax, automatic_tax, product tax codes), Treasury financial accounts, integration options (Checkout, Payment Element), migrating from deprecated Stripe APIs, and security best practices (API key management, API key permissions, webhooks, OAuth). Use when planning, building, modifying, testing, or reviewing any Stripe integration, including choosing a development environment, accepting payments, building marketplaces, integrating Stripe, processing payments, setting up subscriptions, collecting sales tax, VAT, or GST, creating connected accounts, or implementing secure key handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about Stripe Connect configuration, charge patterns, Dashboard access, or how to get started with Connect, is building a marketplace, platform, multi-vendor store, gig platform, or subscription platform, needs to pay out sellers, vendors, or providers, mentions split payments, revenue sharing, multi-party payments, or similar payment distribution concepts, provides a company URL or business description for a recommendation, builds SaaS that routes money between parties (for example, POS, booking, invoicing — not operational SaaS without payment routing), asks about onboarding or KYC for merchants, sellers, and vendors, mentions connected account Dashboard or responsibility configurations, or asks about payment flows, white-label payments, or embedded payments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Running experiments out of the data warehouse instead of via dedicated experiment platforms. SQL-based assignment, exposure logging discipline, metric definitions in dbt models, statistical analysis in SQL or Python, variance reduction with CUPED, sequential testing, and the operational tradeoffs vs platforms like Statsig and Optimizely. Triggers on warehouse-native experimentation, run experiments in BigQuery, run experiments in Snowflake, dbt experiments, SQL t-test, CUPED variance reduction, exposure log, sample ratio mismatch, sequential testing, mSPRT, doubly robust estimation, build vs buy experimentation. Also triggers when the team is choosing between platform and warehouse, building warehouse-native experiment infrastructure, auditing one, or running an experiment with a custom metric the platform cannot handle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Approval cascade definition and tracking for multi-stakeholder document workflows. Internal review sequences, client approval workflows, regulatory review, overdue chasing with escalation logic, version control coordination, and cross-jurisdiction document dependencies. Use when defining who reviews a document and in what order, tracking where a document is stuck in the approval chain, chasing an overdue reviewer, preventing reviewers working on superseded drafts, or mapping dependencies between documents across jurisdictions. Trigger on: 'who needs to approve this', 'document approval', 'review sequence', 'stuck in review', 'overdue approval', 'who has the document', 'version control', 'wrong version', 'document dependency', 'NL SPA waiting on German opinion', 'approval cascade', 'review chain', 'document circulation', 'chasing the partner', 'client approval process', 'where is the document'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。