「mocks」の検索結果

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Help users build functional product prototypes from natural language or visual mocks using AI coding tools. This skill enables product leaders to bypass engineering bottlenecks and validate ideas through hands-on building.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes Vitest tests following project patterns: __tests__/ directories, vi.mock() for module mocking with vi.hoisted() for test-time factories, global LLM mock from src/test/setup.ts, environment variable save/restore in beforeEach/afterEach, vi.clearAllMocks() lifecycle, and test file organization. Use when user says 'write tests', 'add test coverage', 'test this', creates *.test.ts files, or when test failures appear in CI. Do NOT use for non-test code or for debugging without writing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write integration tests using TestContainers for .NET with xUnit. Covers infrastructure testing with real databases, message queues, and caches in Docker containers instead of mocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic WireMock guidance — stub design, JSON or programmatic mappings, precise request matching, response bodies and faults, classpath fixtures, isolation and reset between tests, verification of calls, dynamic ports and base URLs, and avoiding flaky stubs — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Design or review WireMock stubs (JSON mappings or Java DSL); Improve request matching, isolation, or reset strategy for HTTP mocks; Add or fix verification of outbound HTTP calls to a WireMock server; Debug flaky tests involving WireMock or unmatched request journals. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start or stop the WireMock API mock server for UI testing and E2E verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing `@ExceptionHandler` and `@ControllerAdvice` in Spring Boot applications. Validates error response formatting, mocks exceptions, verifies HTTP status codes, tests field-level validation errors, and asserts custom error payloads. Use when writing Spring exception handler tests, REST API error tests, or mocking controller advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing Spring Cache annotations (@Cacheable, @CachePut, @CacheEvict). Generates test code that mocks cache managers, verifies cache hit/miss behavior, tests cache key generation with SpEL expressions, validates eviction strategies, and checks conditional caching scenarios. Triggers: caching tests, test Spring cache, mock cache, Spring Boot caching, cache hit/miss verification, @Cacheable testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing `@ConfigurationProperties` classes with `@ConfigurationPropertiesTest`. Validates property binding, tests validation constraints, verifies default values, checks type conversions, and mocks property sources for Spring Boot configuration properties. Use when testing application configuration binding, validating YAML or application.properties files, verifying environment-specific settings, or testing nested property structures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides comprehensive testing patterns for Spring Boot applications covering unit, integration, slice, and container-based testing with JUnit 5, Mockito, Testcontainers, and performance optimization. Use when writing tests, @Test methods, @MockBean mocks, or implementing test suites for Spring Boot applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-integrity skill. Use for backend/API/persistence, preserve/do-not-change, tests/validation, mocks, rework, multi-part requests. Emits Goal Contracts, Deviation Notices, Phase Checks, Final Audits. Skip for Q&A or trivial edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an API mocking expert specializing in realistic mock services for development, testing, and demos. Design mocks that simulate real API behavior and enable parallel development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix misleading Flutter/Dart test failures where expected data is empty ([]) or default values instead of the mocked response, caused by stale Mockito generated mocks or missing stubs being silently swallowed by try/catch in provider/repository code. Use when: (1) Test expects non-empty data but gets [], (2) Mock stubs for a method are set up but the code under test returns fallback/empty results, (3) A PR added new methods to a service class and tests that previously passed now fail with misleading "expected X, actual: empty" assertions, (4) "Generated files are out of date" CI error alongside test failures. The root cause is MissingStubError thrown by unstubbed mock methods, caught by production try/catch blocks, causing silent fallback to empty state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and debug Flutter E2E integration tests that exercise the real app against a local Docker backend (no mocks). Use when running E2E tests, debugging failures, or working on the local harness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generates regression tests for Python codebases by analyzing changes between old and new code versions and their existing tests. Migrates tests to work with new code, generates tests for new functionality, and creates mocks for external dependencies. Supports unittest and pytest frameworks. Use when refactoring code, adding features, or ensuring backward compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate unit tests with proper mocking for Python (unittest.mock/pytest) or Java (Mockito/JUnit) code. Use when users request test generation, unit tests with mocks, or testing code that has external dependencies like database calls, API requests, file I/O, or network operations. Automatically identifies dependencies to mock and creates executable, maintainable test code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive testing guide for Cloudflare Workers using Vitest and @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers. Use for test setup, binding mocks (D1/KV/R2/DO), integration tests, or encountering test failures, mock errors, coverage issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when migrating from Jest to Bun's test runner, import compatibility, mocks, and config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision framework for isolating every external dependency in a test suite: when to use in-process mocks, HTTP stubs (MSW, WireMock), record-replay, fault injection (Toxiproxy), or ephemeral real services (Testcontainers), and how to enforce that no real calls escape in CI. Use when: "mock service," "stub API," "fake service," "WireMock," "MSW," "Toxiproxy," "test isolation," "dependency management," "stub an external API in CI." Not for: consumer-driven contract verification (Pact, broker) — use contract-testing; standing up a full Docker Compose env or seed data — use test-environments; broad resilience/game-day fault campaigns — use chaos-engineering. Related: contract-testing, test-environments, api-testing, test-data-management, chaos-engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A terminal-native marketing system rendered entirely in Berkeley Mono — every word on the page, from the hero headline down to the footer fine print, is monospaced. The page itself reads like a manpage or a static-site README: warm cream canvas (`#fdfcfc`), nearly-black ink (`#201d1d`), 4px-radius rectangles for the few interactive elements, and bracketed `[+]`/`[-]` ASCII markers used as bullets. The brand's only "visual moment" is a single dark hero card that mocks up the OpenCode TUI itself — black background, monospaced terminal output, ASCII pipe characters, and a wordmark rendered as block-pixel ASCII. Every section sits as a hairline-bordered text block on the cream canvas with no shadows, no gradients, no decorative imagery, and no non-monospaced character anywhere in the system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Mocking Framework workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs You are an API mocking expert specializing in realistic mock services for development, testing, and demos. Design mocks that simulate real API behavior and enable parallel development and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Mocking Framework workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs You are an API mocking expert specializing in realistic mock services for development, testing, and demos. Design mocks that simulate real API behavior and enable parallel development and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes a repository and any existing test suite, grades existing tests for weakness, classifies mocks, emits a phased roadmap for building a test suite that catches real regressions, then executes those phases one at a time. Use when planning or building a test suite, assessing whether existing tests are worth anything, adding tests to a legacy codebase, or when the user mentions test coverage, test strategy, or weak tests. Not for reviewing a branch for bugs, and not for fixing the bugs it logs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。