「obligations」の検索結果

Knowledge base from EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Use for AI system classification (high-risk vs prohibited vs general), conformity assessment procedures, GPAI model obligations, transparency and disclosure requirements, governance structure (AI Office / AI Board), penalty tiers, value-chain operator obligations, post-market monitoring, and Annex III use-case analysis. Does not cover EU liability rules for AI (separate proposed directive) or implementation guidance documents issued after July 2024.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a draft controls and gap pack from a requirement, regulation, standard or policy and the organisation's control descriptions: obligations broken out of the source text, the controls that appear to address each, apparent coverage, gaps, questions for control owners and actions to assess. Never concludes compliance or that a control is effective; owners and audit assess. Use when the user asks to "map this regulation to our controls", "run a controls gap analysis", "break this standard into obligations" or "where is our control coverage thin". Do not use for comparing a policy document against a standard, use policy-gap-review instead; to draft evidence requests from the mapped controls, use control-evidence-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns the text of a regulatory change (new regulation, amendment, rule, guidance or standard revision) into a DRAFT impact note: what changed against the prior text where supplied, who is affected as the text scopes it, an obligations table with dates and owners to confirm, and open interpretation questions for legal. States only what the text says; the rest is UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "brief legal on this new regulation", "list what we must do by when under this amendment", "compare the new standard with the version it replaces", "turn this directive into an obligations table" or "what does this rule mean for us". Do not use for assessing existing controls against a requirement set, use controls-gap-pack instead; for gapping a policy against a standard, use policy-gap-review. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract cited obligations, deadlines, tasks from documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the status of existing agreements with a vendor across all connected systems — CLM, CRM, email, and document storage — with gap analysis and upcoming deadlines. Use when onboarding or renewing a vendor, when you need a consolidated view of what's signed and what's missing (MSA, DPA, SOW), or when checking for approaching expirations and surviving obligations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:ai-act-readiness <system> — EU AI Act 6-question forcing interrogation. Use during AI-system intake, before EU deployment, or during annual compliance refresh as Article 113 obligations phase in (2025-02-02 / 2025-08-02 / 2026-08-02 / 2027-08-02).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics DETERMINISTIC slice (numeric core + rules-only reporter) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher, then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Codex-native limitation: upstream ships no Codex-native auditor pack, so the full nine-dimension semantic sweep requires a Claude Code session — this pack runs the honestly-scoped deterministic-only mode (it can flag, it can never say CLEAN). Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open source license compliance check for a dependency list, a single library, or outbound code. Use when reviewing a manifest, SBOM, or repo for copyleft obligations and license compatibility, when asked whether a library can ship, or when preparing code to be open-sourced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec-driven feature work that freezes obligations instead of the plan: one human-reviewed plan with EARS criteria, path, entities, interface and one-way doors, then proof-backed checks, then build, then an independent Verifier. Use when the user says "tlc-spec-lean", "plan feature", "specify feature", "write the checks", "build this plan", or "verify work". Do NOT use for standalone design documents unattached to a feature, architecture decomposition analysis, or work that already has a task list or checklist to execute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs environment, health and safety on an operating site — hazard controls in order of effectiveness, incident recording and reporting obligations, and safety measurement that does not reward silence. Use this to build or audit a safety program, decide what controls a hazard actually needs, work out whether an injury is recordable or reportable, investigate an incident, or fix safety metrics that have stopped producing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Covers the employment rules that carry real penalties — exempt and non-exempt classification, overtime and hours, employee versus contractor status, work authorization and recordkeeping, accommodation requests, and the notices and retention obligations that go with them. Use this to classify a role, review a contractor arrangement, respond to an accommodation request, work out what records to keep and for how long, or sanity-check a practice you inherited.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a security incident from detection to closure — triage, containment, investigation, communication, and the review afterward. Use this when a compromise is suspected or confirmed, when preparing an incident response plan or running an exercise, when deciding whether something is an incident, or when a breach may trigger notification obligations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Covers what the organization owns and what it is only borrowing — trademarks and clearance, copyright and work-for-hire, patents and trade secrets, open-source license obligations and copyleft reach, and IP terms in customer, contractor and AI-tool agreements. Use this to check whether a name is usable, establish that you own work you paid for, decide how to handle a license obligation in a dependency, or respond to an infringement claim.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles a dispute from the first sign of it — recognizing when preservation obligations attach, issuing and scoping a legal hold, suspending automatic deletion across every system that holds relevant material, preserving privilege, managing outside counsel and cost, and evaluating settlement against the real cost of continuing. Use this to respond to a claim or demand letter, issue a hold, work out which systems the hold has to reach, or decide whether to fight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs voice and meeting infrastructure — phone systems and numbers, emergency calling obligations, conference rooms and their AV, call recording and its retention consequences, and the porting that makes provider changes go badly. Use this to replace a phone system, fix rooms nobody can start a meeting in, meet emergency-calling requirements, port numbers without losing service, or work out why voice quality degrades only sometimes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Owns legal, contracts, intellectual property, regulatory compliance, privacy, security governance, enterprise risk, and audit readiness. Use this to review a contract or commitment, assess regulatory or privacy exposure, evaluate an IP or licensing question, judge the risk in a business decision, prepare for an audit or certification, or when a plan may create obligations the business cannot meet. Also use to decide whether a risk should be accepted, mitigated, or refused.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses and improves how personal data is collected, used, shared, and retained — data mapping, lawful basis, consent, processor agreements, subject rights, and breach obligations. Use this before launching anything that handles personal data, when adding a vendor that will process it, when a data subject request arrives, when assessing exposure under GDPR or US state privacy laws, or when preparing for a privacy review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determines when and how revenue is recognized — performance obligations, contract terms that change the answer, and the deal structures that create accounting problems. Use this to work out how a contract should be recognized, review a non-standard deal before it is signed, understand deferred revenue, or spot terms that would delay or reverse recognition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures the tax questions a growing business faces — corporate income, sales and use, payroll, nexus, and the obligations created by hiring or selling somewhere new. Use this to work out what a new state or country obligates you to, prepare for a tax filing or audit, understand sales tax on your product, or check what a remote hire or new market triggers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triage academic email and calendar (Gmail / Google Calendar via the session's MCP) into a prioritized digest plus a referee-obligations tracker — classifying referee requests, R&R and editor correspondence, co-author threads, seminar and conference invites, and grant/admin deadlines, and proposing a human-gated action for each (draft reply, calendar hold, scaffold a project, snooze). Use when user says "triage my inbox", "check my academic email", "what needs my attention this week", "go through my mail", or when run as a scheduled routine. NEVER auto-sends or auto-accepts anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked 大模型备案怎么做, 生成式人工智能服务备案还是登记, 算法备案流程, AI 生成内容标识怎么加, 我们接了已备案的大模型还要备案吗, or prepare a generative AI product for launch in mainland China. Produces the obligations that apply (generative AI service filing, registration for apps built on a filed model, algorithm filing, AI-generated content labelling), the documents and security self-assessment to prepare, a launch checklist, and the questions for the provincial cyberspace administration, each marked to confirm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an AI usage policy people can actually follow — approved tools, data rules, disclosure duties, and review obligations, in one page instead of legal fog. Use when asked for a company AI policy, acceptable-use rules for ChatGPT/Claude/Copilot at work, guidance on what data may go into AI tools, or to fix a policy nobody reads. Produces a one-page usable policy plus the decision log behind it. Not a substitute for legal advice; pairs with compliance-checklist for regulatory mapping and ai-ethics-review for system-level assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide when and how your product and communications must (or should) label AI-generated content, and write the disclosure policy — surface-by-surface rules, exact label wording, and the review trigger for regulations like the EU AI Act's transparency obligations. Use when asked 'do we have to label AI content', 'write our AI disclosure policy', 'are we covered for the AI Act', or when marketing/support/product start shipping AI-generated output. Produces a disclosure policy with a per-surface matrix and ready-to-use label copy. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。