「observable」の検索結果

曖昧な機能要望や影響の大きい変更を、作業範囲・前提・リスクとともに整理し、期待する動作と検証方法が明確な受け入れ基準や引き継ぎ資料にまとめるスキル。

• 曖昧な機能要望を整理したいとき
• 認証変更やデータ移行の受け入れ基準作成
• 別のエージェントやチームへの実装引き継ぎ

CommunityToolkit.Mvvm Messenger pub/sub for decoupled communication between ViewModels (or any objects). Covers WeakReferenceMessenger vs StrongReferenceMessenger, IRecipient<TMessage>, RequestMessage<T> / AsyncRequestMessage<T> / CollectionRequestMessage<T>, ValueChangedMessage<T>, channels (tokens), and the ObservableRecipient activation lifecycle. Use across WPF, WinUI 3, .NET MAUI, Uno, and Avalonia.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate an RxJS 7 application, library, or test suite to RxJS Next through an agent-led workflow that establishes a green behavioral baseline, makes Observable lifecycle choices explicit, uses @rxjs/migrate only for bounded fixture-proved rewrites, repairs without weakening evidence, and records a versioned migration contract. Use for repository assessment, migration planning or execution, lifecycle review, TestScheduler conversion, or migration closeout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified Minions skill for both deterministic shell jobs and LLM subagent orchestration. Replaces the older `gbrain-jobs` routing intent. Use when: submitting gbrain jobs, shell/background tasks, spawning subagents, checking progress, steering running work, pausing/resuming, parallel fan-out. One durable, observable, steerable queue interface. Also carries the durable-execution doctrine for any operation expected to exceed ~2 minutes: capability ladder, deadman checks that verify the result was reported, and content-addressed stage checkpoints for expensive pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Head of Ops, Knowledge Manager, or TPM-Internal needs to author, validate, or clean up company SOPs and internal runbooks (procurement intake, vendor offboarding, incident-comms cascade, employee onboarding) — including 5W2H completeness checks (Who-What-When-Where-Why-How-HowMuch), cross-link and orphan-page validation across a sprawling Notion/Confluence/Obsidian wiki, KB ingestion + hygiene reporting, and runbook step verification (named owner, expected duration, observable success signal, rollback path, escalation contact). Pairs Ishikawa's 5W2H method, Gawande's *The Checklist Manifesto*, ISO 9001, ITIL v4, and Google SRE Workbook runbook discipline with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools that score completeness, detect anti-patterns, and emit prioritized cleanup lists (e.g., "validate this runbook before it goes into rotation", "audit our Confluence wiki for stale and orphaned SOPs").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build data visualizations with declarative grammars. Use when the user needs Vega-Lite, Vega, Observable Plot, or grammar-of-graphics reasoning, especially for tabular charts that do not require bespoke rendering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when converting PM intake into a slice SPEC.md with observable acceptance outcomes, explicit scope, and advisory sibling build dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns decided work — a PRD, design doc, RFC, or thread — into tasks a builder can act on without guessing. Finds slices that each prove something, grounds them in the code, and writes intent, observable criteria with concrete values, the boundary, what the change disturbs, and only the decisions that are hard to reverse. Walks every surface the work exposes and sweeps the nine unwritten requirements, recording each landing as a criterion already in the source, existing behaviour, n/a, or Unresolved — never as a criterion the walk invented. Defaults to one task per source. Use when the user says "write the task", "cut this PRD into tasks", "turn this design doc into work", or "tlc-plan". Do NOT use for discovery itself or to implement — a one-line ticket is a decision; a blank wish is not.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frame a new design proposal (RFC-shape) under proposals/ — problem before solution, named beneficiary and observable change, real alternatives, honest drawbacks, and a live open-questions backlog. Read when asked to frame a proposal, write an RFC, propose a design, pitch a change, draft a PRD-style design doc, or open a design proposal for review. Do NOT read to record a decision after it is accepted (use record-a-decision), to write an implementation spec (use write-a-spec), to write a postmortem (use write-a-postmortem), or to review or critique an existing design (use review-a-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor and review SwiftUI view files with strong defaults for small dedicated subviews, MV-over-MVVM data flow, stable view trees, explicit dependency injection, and correct Observation usage. Use when cleaning up a SwiftUI view, splitting long bodies, removing inline actions or side effects, reducing computed `some View` helpers, or standardizing `@Observable` and view model initialization patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a website's observable HTTP traffic into a best-effort OpenAPI 3.1 spec by analyzing a `browser-trace` capture. Use when the user wants to discover/extract API endpoints from a browser session, build an OpenAPI doc from network traffic, or document a third-party site's XHR/fetch surface for client integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring SwiftUI code for iOS or macOS, including state and `@Observable` data flow, view composition, resizable layouts, safe areas, display scale, performance, lists, environment, localization, animation, Liquid Glass, and API migration. Also use for iPhone Duo, foldable, or large-display layouts (`NavigationSplitView` on large displays, iPhone tab sidebar, two-column reflow, foldable grids, `ArrangementView`, `ReservedRegion`), hinge effects, vertical bars, `@State` initialization or synthesized-property diagnostics, `@ContentBuilder` ambiguity, `reorderable` drag/drop, custom `AsyncImage` `URLSession`, swipe actions outside List, item-bound `alert`/`confirmationDialog`, `ToolbarOverflowMenu`, `AnimatableValues`, Document APIs (`Document`/`DocumentReader`), and Instruments `.trace` capture or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reactive streams and event-driven programming in Golang using samber/ro — ReactiveX implementation with 150+ type-safe operators, cold/hot observables, 5 subject types (Publish, Behavior, Replay, Async, Unicast), declarative pipelines via Pipe, 40+ plugins (HTTP, cron, fsnotify, JSON, logging), automatic backpressure, error propagation, and Go context integration. Apply when using or adopting samber/ro, when the codebase imports github.com/samber/ro, or when building asynchronous event-driven pipelines, real-time data processing, streams, or reactive architectures in Go. Not for finite slice transforms (→ See `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-lo` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Messy or AI-generated code to clean up: delete AI-generated slop, dead code, and duplication while observable behavior stays identical. Use when the user says: ai-slop-cleaner, cleanup, deslop, refactor, risky, behavior-preserving refactor, risk analysis, refactor workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Evaluating a plugin, connector, or API for adoption: external connector readiness - assess whether a named plugin, connector, API, data provider, or multimodal route is safe, affordable, fresh, and observable; use executor-runtime-readiness for coding-owner choice and toolbelt-readiness for missing capability inventory. Use when the user says: external-connector-readiness, external connector readiness, connector readiness matrix, plugin readiness matrix, provider readiness, api readiness, connector adoption, external plugin adoption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or revise an MVP product requirements document with scope and observable acceptance criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Martin Fowler-inspired refactoring rules when improving existing code structure while preserving observable behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and design an Attio request governor with separate read and write budgets, query-score awareness, bounded retries, and observable backpressure. Use when an Attio integration receives 429 responses or needs safe concurrency controls. Trigger with "Attio rate limits", "Attio 429", or "throttle Attio requests".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix discipline — every defect has an etiology, the chain of cause that produced the observable fault; trace it before patching. Errors only grow: a bandaid leaks unless genuinely localized and leak-free. Walk the diagnostic ladder (presentation → proximate cause → API contract → isolated or systemic) before writing the fix. Use when authoring or reviewing any bug fix, regression patch, "quick fix" PR, or when deciding whether to ship, defer, or refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI 架构模式，使用 @Observable 进行状态管理，视图组合，导航，性能优化，以及现代 iOS/macOS UI 最佳实践。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SwiftUI 架构模式，使用 @Observable 进行状态管理，视图组合、导航、性能优化以及现代 iOS/macOS UI 最佳实践。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Change Octane's runtime, compiler, scheduler, reconciler, SSR, or hydration engine. Use before editing packages/octane/src. Covers the observable contract, hot-path analysis, and the performance evidence required before handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure existing code while preserving observable behavior. Use for targeted technical debt or hotspot work with characterization tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shape a request into one end-to-end slice with observable behavior; review write scope and reversible decisions. Use when: planning, breaking down or scoping a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。