「plain-language」の検索結果

Check live air quality anywhere with zero API keys — Open-Meteo's air-quality API via curl, decoded from raw PM2.5 and AQI numbers into what they mean for going outside. Use when asked what's the air quality, is it safe to run outside, AQI in my city, or pollution levels right now. Produces the current AQI and pollutant levels, the plain-language health read with the standard bands, and the rerunnable command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answers natural-language business questions over existing Power BI reports and semantic models through the FabricIQ MCP endpoint, discovering artifacts, resolving entities, generating the DAX itself, and returning a plain-language answer. Use when the user asks a data question, including one that says to query the model directly. For DAX the user supplies, or measures to save, use semantic-model-authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a security scan on a deployed Power Pages site, fetches the latest scan report, and produces a plain-language summary. Scans the live site's public surface for vulnerabilities and surfaces issues by severity. Use when the user wants to scan, check, test, audit, or assess a published site, find vulnerabilities on production, view the latest scan report, see previous scan results, run a security audit, or asks "how safe is my live site?", "is my site vulnerable?", "audit my production site" — even if they say "find issues" or "check for problems" without mentioning "scan" or "security".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating music with MiniMax models on Scenario via MCP: full songs with vocals from a lyric sheet, structure tags like [Verse] and [Chorus], auto-written lyrics from a plain-language brief, instrumental tracks from a style prompt, or covering an uploaded MP3 or WAV in a new genre while keeping the melody. Keywords: MiniMax Music 3.0, Music Cover, Hailuo, text-to-music, audio-to-audio, song generation, lyrics, vocals, instrumental, BPM, genre swap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No. 998-IIIQ and, where applicable, EU GDPR plus ePrivacy/cookie consent rules. Inventories the privacy documents present (privacy policy, cookie policy, cookie banner, consent flow, controller and DPO contact, data subject rights channel, cross-border transfer disclosures, AZ operator-registration references) and scores each against the applicable statutory requirements. Produces a dual-layer report: a plain-language traffic-light summary for business owners plus a clause-by-clause findings table with article-level citations for lawyers. Assessment-only — no drafting. Use whenever the user shares a URL or privacy/cookie policy text for an AZ-based or AZ-targeted site; also when the user mentions an .az domain, Law 998, the AZ State Register, ePrivacy, an Art. 27 EU representative, or asks "is my site GDPR compliant", "do I need to register as an operator in Azerbaijan", or "is our cookie banner lawful" — even without the word "audit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a repo, product page, or update into a recording-ready video script in a receipts-first format - verifies every claim against live sources, then writes timestamped VO + on-screen direction with a plain-language glossary, assets checklist, anti-tells, and a verify-before-recording list

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a safe, governed autonomous loop from a plain-language goal. Use when the user says /coco-loop, "run an autonomous loop", "keep my build green for N hours", "work on X autonomously for a while", or wants a bounded self-improving loop that proposes fixes and never commits on its own. Turns a vague goal into a readable charter the user confirms, then arms and runs the loop propose-only under the coco-loops governance framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate a complete mathematical modeling contest problem sentence by sentence into precise modeling language, preserve every substantive condition and definition, expose hidden constraints, draw a mandatory Mermaid cross-question flowchart, audit omissions, and deliver one easy-to-open Markdown report. For Huawei Cup (CPGMCM) graduate-contest problems, additionally prepend a plain-language layer that rewrites the background and questions as a primary-school word problem with a mandatory term-mapping table. Optionally render the finished report as one standalone HTML page on request. Use whenever a user supplies a CUMCM, CPGMCM, or other modeling problem and asks to interpret, translate, unpack, read closely, identify requirements, or avoid missing details before modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, organize, name, edit, or review Enterprise developer documentation, specifications, and technical instructions; ground claims in current source and finish with a plain-language cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-explain the previous assistant message, or any text typed after the command, in a much simpler way. For when a reply made you go 'bro what'. Use /bro for a plain-language version of the last answer, or /bro <text> to simplify a pasted paragraph, error, email, or doc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements GDPR Article 12 transparent information and communication requirements, covering concise, intelligible, and plain language obligations, response timelines, fee and refusal provisions, and layered notice design. Activate for transparent communication, Art. 12, privacy notice, plain language, response timeline queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and implements privacy notices for children that comply with GDPR Articles 12-14, UK AADC Standard 4, and COPPA Section 312.4. Covers plain language, visual explanations, layered information, age-appropriate vocabulary, and interactive notice elements. Keywords: children privacy notice, transparency, plain language, visual, age-appropriate, layered notice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a plain-language stakeholder summary from an existing feature specification, for sharing with non-technical stakeholders before implementation kicks off. Use when the user wants to draft a stakeholder summary, executive summary, or business summary of a feature spec or PRD. Does not write the spec itself — use plan-a-feature. Does not sequence the build into phases — use plan-a-phased-build. Does not produce an implementation plan — use plan-implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another. Does not investigate runtime bugs — use investigate. Does not assess module-level architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not research open-ended options with no second artifact to compare against — use research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a software repository at the latest remote main commit and turn its implemented architecture into a citation-backed interactive isometric system map with a legend, selectable infrastructure buildings, dependency and payload flows, and plain-language learner explanations. For eligible public GitHub repositories, also contribute the verified map to tamdogood/CodeTerrain with a pull request. Use when a user provides a repository URL or asks to visualize, explore, learn, explain, or map a repo's architecture, infrastructure, runtime control flow, data flow, services, queues, stores, external systems, or deployment topology in an interactive UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit user-selected Markdown or text files for deterministic plain-language findings. Use only when the user explicitly invokes this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hold every response to the ISO 24495 plain-language rules, and route to the sector skills. Codex has no output style, so these rules are a skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routing skill of last resort. Takes a plain-language QA situation and names the right 1-2 skills to use and in what order. Use ONLY when the request does not match any other skill's trigger phrases. Use when: "which skill should I use," "where do I start," "I'm not sure what to test," "/qa-do," or any vague QA situation that doesn't map to one skill. Not for: bootstrapping a brand-new project with no QA — use qa-start. Not for: capturing project setup/context — use qa-project-context. If the request clearly matches another skill, invoke that skill directly instead of routing through here. Related: qa-start, qa-project-context, test-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edits existing marketing copy in ordered passes (structure, claims, sentences, consistency, proof) and returns the edited text with a change log and a list of questions for the author. Flags claims that need evidence instead of inventing proof, and keeps the writer's voice. Use when someone says "edit this copy", "proofread this page", "tighten this", "polish this email", "review my landing page copy", "make this clearer", "check this before we publish", or asks for copy feedback on a page, ad, email or product description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cucumber runs behavior-driven (BDD) tests written as plain-language Gherkin feature files and matches each Given/When/Then step to code. Use when the user wants to write feature files, implement step definitions in JavaScript or TypeScript with cucumber-js, share state through a World, add hooks, tags and profiles, or run BDD scenarios in CI. Also use when the user mentions "cucumber," "BDD," "Gherkin," "feature files," "given-when-then," "step definitions," or "behavior-driven." For contract testing, see pact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-explain the previous assistant message in a much simpler way — for when the reply made you go 'bro what'. Use /bro to get a plain-language version of the last answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze, draft, and review Insurance clauses for Construction contracts. Use when the user mentions insurance clause, coverage requirements, construction insurance, or asks to review, redline, or generate this clause type. Returns structured risk assessment, plain-language summary, and suggested alternative language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。