「policy」の検索結果

Viking Search tuning for specified policy directions. Use this when the user provides specific queries, a type of query, or a business policy direction, and asks to boost, suppress, or fix a class of search results through request-parameter passthrough. You must only perform read-only baseline evaluation and request-level candidate testing; do not modify search scenes, app config, dictionaries, recommend scenes, or primary recall parameters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A zero-hallucination privacy-policy generator that takes anyone — non-lawyer founder to lawyer — from a guided intake to a publishable, jurisdiction-aware privacy policy. Jurisdiction-first: it detects which laws apply from where your users are, then drafts only the required clauses — GDPR/EU + UK, US (CCPA/CPRA, ~20 state laws, COPPA, sector overlays), and global/MENA (LGPD, Quebec Law 25, India DPDP, China PIPL, UAE/DIFC, Saudi PDPL), plus app-store, cookies, and AI/EU AI Act disclosures. Its rule: state only what you confirm; never invent a statute, citation, fine, or date — every claim is source-cited and QA-gated. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: explaining current FAR, DFARS, or agency-supplement text; determining documented acquisition-policy status for an agency and FAR part; comparing codified text, RFO model text, and agency deviations; tracing acquisition rulemaking; finding procurement comment periods; analyzing public comments; refreshing prior policy analysis; or producing an Acquisition Policy Impact Brief. Use published federal sources and supplied policy documents without making legal or procurement-specific applicability determinations. Do not use for clause selection, market research execution, opportunities, pricing, grants, or cooperative agreements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route new policy briefing, policy update, regulatory update deck, regulatory change deck, compliance change summary, legal update deck, or legal/product policy presentation requests here before generic AIPPT. Use this whenever the user wants a new policy interpretation deck with timelines, impacts, risks, and recommended actions. Do not use this scene pack for email memos, FAQ-only outputs, compliance copy polishing, or non-deck legal writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft compliance policies required by a framework (access control, incident response, data retention). Use when asked to "write an access control policy", "draft our incident response policy", or "we need a data retention policy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Salesforce Industries Insurance (Financial Services Cloud Insurance): permission set licenses, irreversible org settings, core insurance objects, coverage types, claim configuration, and OmniScript-based quoting via the Insurance Product Administration API. Trigger keywords: insurance setup, FSC Insurance, InsurancePolicy object, InsurancePolicyCoverage, policy quoting OmniScript, claim type configuration, InsProductService, Digital Insurance Platform, many-to-many policy, multiple producers. NOT for which FSC Insurance modules to license or how to architect claims and underwriting — use architect/insurance-cloud-architecture. NOT for generic OmniStudio setup, CPQ/Pricebook quoting or Health Cloud.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts an Adverse Event Reporting Policy compliant with 21 CFR 312.32 (IND safety reporting), 21 CFR 314.80 (postmarketing), and ICH E2A, with multi-jurisdictional overlays (EMA, PMDA, Health Canada). Covers seriousness/causality frameworks, expedited reporting timelines, roles, documentation standards, training mandates, and QA mechanisms. Use when drafting or updating an adverse event reporting policy, pharmacovigilance policy, AE/SAE reporting SOP, or safety reporting framework for a pharmaceutical company, CRO, biotech, or clinical research institution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Azure Policy Deep — azure Policy deep compliance and governance management. Covers policy definitions, initiatives, assignments, compliance evaluation, exemptions, remediation tasks, custom policies, and regulatory compliance. Use when managing Azure governance at scale, reviewing compliance states, creating custom policies, or troubleshooting policy evaluation results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Adobe-specific lint rules, CI policy checks, and runtime guardrails covering credential scanning (p8_ patterns), Firefly content policy pre-screening, PDF Services quota enforcement, and OAuth scope validation. Trigger with phrases like "adobe policy", "adobe lint", "adobe guardrails", "adobe eslint", "adobe content policy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Privacy Policy Generator - 隐私政策生成器. Use when you need privacy policy capabilities. Triggers on: privacy policy. 隐私政策生成器。GDPR/CCPA合规、App/网站隐私政策、合规审计。Privacy policy generator with GDPR, CCPA compliance. 隐私政策、合规。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A workplace-safety compliance review for a manufacturing regulator — findings, the evidence chain, and the corrective mandate. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for regulator, plant leadership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A public-transit funding proposal for a city council — ridership need, the plan, the risk controls, and the ask. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for city council, public board.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A hospital data-governance briefing: patient-data risk, the control framework, accountability, and the approval the board must give. Built as a decision-grade policy briefing deck for health-system board, regulators.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safely simulates and applies Identity and Access Management (IAM) v1 (Allow) policy changes on Google Cloud. Uses the Policy Simulator to replay historical access logs against proposed policies to prevent breaking active workloads before applying the changes. Use when simulating or applying IAM v1 allow policies across Projects, Folders, or Organizations. Don't use for analyzing IAM v2 deny policies, VPC Service Controls, or performing general policy troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an OpenShell sandbox returns policy_denied, mentions policy.local, or needs a narrow network policy proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates NVIDIA Cosmos Policy on LIBERO and RoboCasa simulation environments. Use when setting up cosmos-policy for robot manipulation evaluation, running headless GPU evaluations with EGL rendering, or profiling inference latency on cluster or local GPU machines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Imperative guidance for the System.Text.Json APIs added in .NET 11: the built-in `JsonNamingPolicy.PascalCase` naming policy, and the strongly-typed generic `JsonSerializerOptions.GetTypeInfo` and `JsonSerializerOptions.TryGetTypeInfo` metadata accessors (generic overloads that return a typed `JsonTypeInfo`). USE ONLY when the user is targeting net11.0 or later and needs PascalCase JSON property or dictionary-key names without writing a custom naming policy, a strongly-typed generic `JsonTypeInfo` instead of the non-generic `JsonTypeInfo`, or a no-throw way to probe whether a type's serialization metadata is resolved. DO NOT USE when the target is earlier than net11.0, the requested behavior uses an established pre-net11 naming policy, or the user explicitly selected another JSON library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create concise policy briefs that translate research into actionable recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest + clubSandwich + AER + ivreg + did + bacondecomp + HonestDiD + eventstudyr + rdrobust + rddensity + Synth + gsynth + synthdid + MatchIt + WeightIt + cobalt + ebal + grf + DoubleML + mediation + marginaleffects + modelsummary + kableExtra + gt + ggplot2 + ggpubr + cowplot + binsreg. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step R pipeline an applied economist runs on every paper — (1) data import & cleaning (read_dta/read_csv, naniar, janitor, validate-merges), (2) variable construction (mutate/across/winsorize/group_by + lag/lead with dplyr), (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1 (gtsummary, modelsummary::datasummary, tableone), (4) classical diagnostic tests (shapiro/jarque.bera.test/bptest/dwtest/bgtest/vif/adf.test/kpss.test/Hausman), (5) baseline modeling (fixest::feols, ivreg, did::att_gt, eventstudyr, sun_ab, did_imputation, synthdid, rdrobust, MatchIt, WeightIt, grf::causal_forest, DoubleML, mediation), (6) robustness battery (modelsummary stack, clubSandwich CRSE, fwildclusterboot, ri2, robomit Oster, bacondecomp, HonestDiD), (7) further analysis (interactions + marginaleffects, mediation::mediate, gsem via lavaan, dose-response splines, grf CATE), (8) publication-ready tables & figures (modelsummary, kableExtra, gt, stargazer, texreg, flextable to LaTeX/Word/HTML; ggplot2 + ggpubr + cowplot + binsreg + iplot for figures). **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `WeightIt` / `gfoRmula` / `tmle` / `ltmle`, Mendelian randomization via `MendelianRandomization` / `TwoSampleMR` / `MRPRESSO`, KM / Cox / AFT / RMST survival via `survival` / `survminer` / `flexsurv`, E-value sensitivity via `EValue`, principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `DoubleML`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `causalweight` / `grf`, causal forest via `grf::causal_forest`, BART/BCF via `bartCause` / `bcf`, matrix completion via `MCPanel`, CATE distribution + policy tree via `policytree`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal via `conformalInference` / `cfcausal`, fairness audit via `fairmodels`, DAG learning via `pcalg` / `bnlearn` / LLM-assisted). Use when the user asks for a complete R empirical analysis, wants a tidyverse-style reproducible R script / Quarto workflow, prefers fixest over reghdfe, needs the R counterpart to StatsPAI / 00.1 / 00.2, or names a specific R step in isolation ("feols with cluster", "MatchIt nearest neighbor", "bacondecomp in R", "gtsummary table 1", "modelsummary to Word"). Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation R", "tmle ltmle", "MendelianRandomization", "TwoSampleMR", "MRPRESSO", "survival cox AFT", "STROBE R", "EValue R", "公共健康 R", "流行病学 R". Mode B triggers on "DoubleML R", "grf causal forest", "policytree", "bartCause bcf", "conformal causal R", "fairmodels", "pcalg NOTEARS", "因果机器学习 R".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Bot replies via Discord, Slack, or Telegram: normalize Discord, Slack, Telegram, and other gateway sessions into origin, thread, delivery, silent, attachment, and status-update policy. Use when the user says: gateway-intent-card, gateway intent, discord thread, slack thread, telegram delivery, discord delivery policy, slack delivery policy, telegram delivery policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides verified corrections for IAM behaviors that AI agents frequently get wrong — policy evaluation edge cases, trust policy gotchas, STS session limits, Organizations quirks, and SAML/MFA specifics. Also provides structured workflows for IAM role management and baseline policy generation from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON. Covers condition operator safety (ForAnyValue/ForAllValues with Null checks), bucket policy deny patterns (VPC endpoint restrictions, org paths), confused deputy protection, and service role creation for AWS services (Glue, CloudTrail, Lambda, ECS, etc.) with aws:SourceAccount/aws:SourceArn trust conditions. Applies when creating IAM roles, writing IAM or bucket policies, generating policies from application source code or a Terraform plan JSON, working with STS, Organizations, or condition operators, or any task needing a service or execution role. Does not cover non-IAM authorization like Cognito user-pool policies or app-level RBAC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and enforce repository, runtime, data, spend, endpoint, and approval guardrails without guessing secret formats or content-policy rules. Use when the task requires adobe policy and execution guardrails. Trigger with "Adobe guardrails", "block unsafe Adobe calls", or "Adobe policy checks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide when and how your product and communications must (or should) label AI-generated content, and write the disclosure policy — surface-by-surface rules, exact label wording, and the review trigger for regulations like the EU AI Act's transparency obligations. Use when asked 'do we have to label AI content', 'write our AI disclosure policy', 'are we covered for the AI Act', or when marketing/support/product start shipping AI-generated output. Produces a disclosure policy with a per-surface matrix and ready-to-use label copy. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when placing the contribution against the policy-evaluation literature and sharpening it as a policy answer for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Stakes the contribution and the policy-relevant "so what"; it does not write the full introduction or design the identification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。