79 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
[omh] Building or polishing a web or terminal UI: prepare design-system-driven web and terminal (TUI) UI creation, redesign, polish, accessibility, performance, and visual QA handoffs. Use when the user says: frontend, front-end, front end, frontend skill, in the frontend, on the frontend, to the frontend, web ui.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Polish assemblies and call variants from Oxford Nanopore data using medaka. Uses neural networks trained on specific basecaller versions. Use when improving ONT-only assemblies or calling variants from Nanopore data without short-read polishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply interface craft when building or reviewing UI - motion, easing, timing, springs, component feel, and visual foundations. Use when building a component, animation, transition, hover or press state, modal, drawer, toast, or when polishing an interface so it feels right. Says "make this feel better", "add an animation", "polish the UI", "review this component".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build native-feeling, benchmark-quality mobile app screens (Expo / React Native). Use when designing or implementing any mobile UI — screens, flows, onboarding, paywalls, tab bars, sheets, settings, empty states — or when polishing motion, navigation, typography, dark mode, or perceived performance. Enforces Apple HIG fidelity, semantic colors, native controls, anti-slop discipline, navigation semantics (push vs replace, modal vs sheet vs overlay, the one-way doors where back must not exist), purposeful Reanimated motion, a full-motion simulator-verified iteration loop, and a study-real-apps-first workflow (pairs with the Appllama MCP). Trigger on "build a screen", "make this screen better", "design the onboarding", "wire up this flow", "polish the UI", "make it feel native", or any mobile design/implementation task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and fix visual hierarchy, spacing, color, and depth in web UIs. Use when the user mentions "my UI looks off" (or amateur/unprofessional), "fix the design", "Tailwind styling", "color palette", "visual hierarchy", "design system", "spacing scale", or "component styling". Also trigger when building consistent design tokens, creating dark mode themes, improving data-visualization clarity, or polishing UI details before launch. Covers grayscale-first workflow, constrained design scales, shadows, and component styling. For typeface selection, see web-typography. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standards and audits for writing academic papers, especially ML/NLP submissions to NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, EMNLP, NAACL. Covers the author's house prose rules (zero em dashes, zero fluff, every sentence earns its place), verification of hallucinated claims and hallucinated or malformed bibliography entries, the ACL policy on AI writing assistance and what must be disclosed, and best practices for paper structure, experiments, reproducibility checklists, and rebuttals. Use this skill whenever the user is drafting, editing, polishing, restructuring, or reviewing a paper, abstract, intro, related work, rebuttal, or camera-ready; whenever they ask to "clean up" or "tighten" academic writing; whenever citations or a .bib file need checking; and whenever they ask what has to be disclosed about AI assistance. Reach for it even when the user only says "make this section better", "check my references", or "is this ready to submit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dialogue writing and revision for screen and stage (对白/台词/潜台词) — merged from Robert McKee's Dialogue (dialogue as action, said/unsaid/unsayable, exposition as ammunition, beat = action/reaction gerunds, flaws of credibility/language/content/design, character-specific vocabulary and grammar, seven scene analyses), Richard Walter (economy, subtext, argument, no small talk, no parentheticals, silence), Neill Hicks (listening, on-the-nose exceptions, energy, five-step exercise), Lu Jun (语言要美; 典雅美/通俗美, 对话三要求 动作性/性格化/潜台词), Lajos Egri (dialogue born of three-dimensional character, escalation), Blake Snyder (cover-the-names test), and screwball-comedy dialogue conventions. Use when writing or polishing dialogue, fixing on-the-nose or expository lines, giving each character a distinct voice, converting a two-hander into a trialogue, writing comedy exchanges, or cutting speeches. Chinese-opera lyrics (戏曲唱词) are in sw-chinese-opera-banqiang, not here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting or polishing an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it reads across all four fields, follows AA house style (Chicago author-date; free-format submission accepted), fits the section word caps (Research Articles ≤ 8,000 words; abstract 200 words), and uses inclusive, care-ful language. Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting or polishing an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript so it reads clearly for a systems-science audience, follows the journal's format, and meets front-matter requirements (abstract <= 250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract). Research papers run to about 8,000 words (no hard cap). Tightens prose and format; it does not invent content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when polishing the prose of an Advanced Materials manuscript for Wiley house style, concision, precise materials nomenclature and units, and readability across materials subfields. Polishes language; does not restructure the advance or manage the length budget.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when polishing the prose and structure of an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript to AOM house style and an argument-driven voice. Late-stage polish; it does NOT build theory or check logic — do those first with amr-theory-development and amr-data-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when polishing the prose of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — sustained argumentative writing that carries theory and evidence together, a self-contained abstract, disciplined length despite the absence of a hard cap, and full anonymization for double-anonymized review. Polishes prose; it does not run the submission preflight (aos-submission).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates genome assembly quality across the three orthogonal axes - contiguity (QUAST auN/NG50/NGx, not bare N50), completeness (BUSCO/compleasm gene-space plus Merqury k-mer completeness), and correctness (reference-free Merqury QV, Inspector/CRAQ structural errors, asmgene false-duplication/collapse). Covers why N50 is the most-gamed metric, why QV measured on the polishing reads is circular, distinguishing uncollapsed haplotigs from real WGD, and the EBP/VGP 6.C.Q40 standard. Use when judging whether an assembly is good enough to annotate or publish, comparing assemblers, diagnosing a fragmented or duplicated assembly, or assessing a phased diploid assembly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and build complete web experiences from scratch — award-level product and marketing pages, cinematic scroll-directed sites where the page is directed like a film, and multi-screen products (app, dashboard, admin, settings, onboarding, docs site) built as one design system with every component, state and route in one style. Use whenever the user wants to create or redesign a landing page, website, hero section, portfolio, promo or product page; wants scroll animations, storytelling pages, or a site that feels like a movie; or says "make it beautiful", "make it wow", "cinematic", or "design system" — even if they name no technique. Generates its own assets via local CLIs (images, video frames, depth maps, 3D), and gates every ship with an executable anti-slop linter and a screenshot verification loop. Not for polishing a UI someone else built, and not for backend-only work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic copy editing through focused passes (the Seven Sweeps Framework) covering clarity, voice, proof, specificity, and friction removal. Use when editing marketing copy, reviewing drafts, polishing content, or proofreading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
将中文学术文本翻译为符合国际期刊标准的高级英语，并提供多个润色版本以供选择。确保术语准确、逻辑严谨、句式复杂，彻底消除中式英语。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end academic paper writing workflow. Takes a research repository and produces a publication-ready LaTeX manuscript for top ML/AI conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM). Covers repo understanding, structure planning, section drafting, citation management, anti-AI polishing, and conference formatting. Triggers on "write paper", "draft paper", "scholar writing", "paper writing workflow".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to "finalize implementation", "finalize changes", "wrap up implementation", "finish up", "ready to commit", or "run QA workflow".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Polish, translate, diagnose, and restructure technical manuscript text into IEEE-style academic English using routed failure-mode guidance. Use for IEEE abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, experiments, conclusions, figure captions, rebuttals, Chinese-to-English technical writing, AI-like or template-like academic prose, and engineering prose that needs clearer problem logic, contribution framing, method rationale, evidence discipline, natural author voice, or reviewer-ready wording.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Polishes working code through successive quality passes in fresh subagents. Use after tests pass when code needs multi-dimension refinement before release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when polishing, diagnosing, tailoring, or exporting resumes for LLM, RAG, Agent, Agentic RL, post-training, pretraining, AIGC, search/ranking, multimodal, AI backend, or LLM algorithm internships from raw resume text, a materials folder, and/or a target job description. Audits evidence, maps JD fit, enforces truth boundaries, writes polished and targeted resumes, generates interviewer-style grilling questions, answer cards, evidence-upgrade plans, and optional open-source project recommendations without fabricating experience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and prompt a stylized 3D animated short for Seedance 2.0 with stable character identities, environment continuity, causal story beats, shot-specific performance, camera, sound, and clip handoffs. Use when a story needs one 4–15 second generation or a longer multi-clip plan; not for photoreal live action, a single still, or generic prompt polishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects and removes AI writing patterns from text. Use when polishing drafts, cleaning AI-generated content, or ensuring writing sounds authentically human. Invoke with "run through slop detector", "clean this up", or "remove AI fingerprints".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn vague or partially formed AI, computer-science, data-driven, and engineering-method research directions into evidence-grounded, falsifiable, paper-ready Research Idea Briefs through heuristic questioning, staged confirmation, literature positioning, novelty attack, and method-figure planning. Use when the user needs to clarify a research idea, formalize inputs/outputs/objectives/constraints, frame background and motivation, select 3-5 anchor papers, identify a defensible gap, derive 2-3 contributions, stress-test novelty, or design an input-to-output method framework and core-paper figure. Also trigger on requests such as 明确科研 idea、启发式梳理 idea、互动追问科研问题、梳理论文创新点、定义研究任务、找对标论文、把研究方向变成论文方案、画方法框架图. Do not use as the primary workflow for running experiments, exhaustive systematic reviews, drafting full manuscript sections, or polishing finished prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。