「port-daddy」の検索結果

Refute-before-prove research discipline: automated counterexample sweeps before any formalization, meter-integrity audits for information-bound experiments, mutation-tested model checkers, pre-registered commit-or-cut gates for speculative directions, wrong-turn reporting, and numeric-claim provenance. Use when validating any new theorem, bound, equilibrium, or security claim; when building or trusting a checker, simulator, or experiment; or when deciding whether a speculative research direction lives or dies. NOT for exploratory brainstorming, product prioritization, writing style, or literature review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Frontend stack decisions, Cloudflare deployment patterns, component systems, and internal tools architecture. Use for framework selection, deployment strategy, design system bridging, shadcn setup. Activate on "frontend architecture", "tech stack", "Cloudflare Pages", "component library", "internal tools", "shadcn setup". NOT for writing CSS (use frontend-developer), design critique (use design-critic), or backend APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build low-fidelity wireframes, screen mockups, and user-flow diagrams in Frame0 (the hand-drawn Balsamiq-style wireframing tool) through its connected MCP server. Use when asked to wireframe a screen, sketch a UI, make a low-fi mockup, lay out an app's screens, or diagram a user flow with clickable links. Triggers: "wireframe", "frame0", "low-fi mockup", "sketch a screen", "user flow", "lo-fi", "rough out the UI". NOT for high-fidelity visual design, brand systems, or color/typography polish (use web-design-expert / Figma); NOT for production UI code (use frontend skills).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end form handling with react-hook-form, Zod schemas, validation patterns, error messaging, field arrays, and multi-step wizards. Use for complex forms, validation architecture, autosave, field dependencies. Activate on "form validation", "react-hook-form", "Zod", "form error", "multi-step form", "wizard". NOT for simple HTML forms, backend validation only, or non-React frameworks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operationalizing an expungement website — user intake flows, document generation pipelines, court filing integrations, payment processing, state-by-state workflow variations, customer support for sensitive populations, and the handoff between automated systems and human legal review. Activate on 'expungement operations', 'legal tech SaaS', 'court filing integration', 'document automation pipeline', 'expungement business', 'legal service workflow', 'multi-state legal operations'. NOT for expungement law itself (use national-expungement-expert), web design (use legal-tech-web-design), or legal document drafting (use recovery-app-legal-terms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure persuasive speeches and formal arguments in forensic, legal, policy, and competitive debate styles. Use when the user needs to prepare talks, opening or closing arguments, policy pitches, public explanations, debate speeches, or mentions 'forensic speech', 'formal argument', 'persuasive speech structure', 'debate speech', 'opening statement', 'closing argument'. Turns structured claims into audience-tuned persuasive delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Principled action selection for autonomous agents using Expected Free Energy (EFE) under the Active Inference framework. Each candidate action is scored as G(n) = w_prag * (-E[p_n] * damping) + w_epist * (-Var[p_n] * novelty(n)), where agent beliefs are maintained as per-node Beta distributions and updated via Bayesian observation. Selection is a softmax over -gamma * G, making exploration an automatic consequence of uncertainty rather than a hardcoded epsilon. Precision weights w_prag and w_epist self-adapt via surprise history, shifting the agent between exploitation and exploration regimes without any manually tuned schedule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure the path from an inbound event (webhook, email, SMS, GitHub comment, file, cron) to an agent spawn in the Port Daddy fleet. Use when wiring trigger sources to agents, reviewing the io-wiring registry, adding a trust/permission gate, hardening output sinks (SSRF/path traversal), scoping tools by provenance, or proving the spawn path is safe against prompt-injection → tool-abuse. Encodes ADR-0093 and the red-team threat model. NOT for generic Coast Guard sandboxing (ADR-0050), the macaroon push-grant gate alone (ADR-0053), or non-fleet code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analytical methods for decomposing expert performance into cognitive and physical task components

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design dashboards for migrations and runtimes. Use for authority drift, verifier status, burn-down, runtime health, or pain panels. NOT for vanity analytics, ad hoc charts, or duplicate reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for sensemaking, frame revision, anomaly handling, questioning strategy, and ambiguity diagnosis with the Data/Frame model before action is chosen. NOT for deterministic classification, settled execution planning, or situations where the frame is already stable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational impossibility result proving consensus cannot be guaranteed in asynchronous systems with even one faulty process

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and diagnose FIPA-style ontology-service interactions while keeping declared ontology relations, provider capability, and application authorization separate. NOT for treating an ontology mapping as provider authority or guaranteed interoperability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage feature manifests for code traceability. Use when creating new features, updating existing features, checking feature health, or exploring the feature-to-code relationship. Activates for manifest validation, feature creation, changelog updates, and traceability queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interpret and design bounded FIPA communicative-act exchanges using XC00037H semantics while keeping delivery, authority, and external effects separate. NOT for proving delivery, task authorization, or external effect completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FIPA standard for agent platform management including lifecycle, directory, and communication services

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare high-quality datasets for LLM fine-tuning with filtering, deduplication, augmentation, and RLHF data formatting. Activate on: fine-tuning data, training data curation, RLHF dataset, data quality filtering, SFT dataset. NOT for: model training infrastructure (ai-engineer), prompt engineering without fine-tuning (prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

S3, multipart uploads, CDN integration, and presigned URLs for file storage. Activate on: file upload, S3, presigned URL, multipart upload, CDN, blob storage, image upload, media storage. NOT for: data warehouse storage (use lakehouse-architect), database design (use dimensional-modeler).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Defensive counterpart to federated-harbor-redteam: closes the smells that red team opens against The Federated Harbor whitepaper. Federation-specific defenses for cross-harbor primitives — mechanization commitments, scope hedges, cross-paper dependency formalization, pre-emptive analogies (CT, Macaroons, atomic swaps), and defense-in-depth framing (refuses vs prices). Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-redteam. NOT for ad-hoc code review, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use whitehat-defense).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial reviewer for The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor and Bonded Commons. Probes federation-specific threats: trust transitivity, cross-harbor token forgery, federated revocation under partition, cross-harbor Sybil, cross-domain settlement, equivocation, bond-pool draining, cold-start joining, federation-operator Sybil. Use during a versioned red-vs-white round; pairs with federated-harbor-whitehat. NOT for incident response, NOT for the Anchor or Bonded papers (use redteam-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafting and iterating sections of The Federated Harbor whitepaper — the third paper in the Curiositech sequence after Anchor (local identity) and Bonded Commons (local coordination), extending coordination across machines and administrative domains. Use when authoring a section, rewriting a section after a redteam/whitehat round, or composing a new chapter. NOT for marketing copy, NOT for the other two papers, NOT for production threat response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert debugger for Next.js + Cloudflare Workers + Supabase stacks. Systematic troubleshooting for auth, caching, workers, RLS, CORS, and build issues. Activate on: 'debug', 'not working', 'error', 'broken', '500', '401', '403', 'cache issue', 'RLS', 'CORS'. NOT for: feature development (use language skills), architecture design (use system-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when introducing a feature flag system, choosing between release flags / experiment flags / operational flags / kill switches / permission flags, designing percentage rollouts, building kill-switch + circuit-breaker patterns, structuring evaluation contexts (user IDs, plan tier, region), or building flag-cleanup discipline. Triggers: LaunchDarkly / GrowthBook / Unleash / Flagsmith / OpenFeature, percentage ramp, sticky bucketing, kill switch wired to alerting, "we still have flags from 2 years ago", flag debt, OpenFeature provider, evaluation context, default value on provider failure. NOT for A/B test statistical analysis (separate skill), traffic-split routing at the edge, build-time bundler defines, or environment-based config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage DAG execution lifecycles including start, stop, pause, resume, and cleanup. Activate on 'execution lifecycle', 'stop execution', 'abort DAG', 'graceful shutdown', 'kill process'. NOT for cost estimation, DAG building, or skill selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。